谈判数字化服务中算法管理的限制:来自德国和挪威的案例

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Virginia Doellgast, Ines Wagner, Sean O'Brady
{"title":"谈判数字化服务中算法管理的限制:来自德国和挪威的案例","authors":"Virginia Doellgast, Ines Wagner, Sean O'Brady","doi":"10.1177/10242589221143044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms are increasingly used to monitor employees and to automate management decisions. In this article, we ask how worker representatives adapt traditional collective voice institutions to regulate the adoption and use of these tools in the workplace. Our findings are based on a comparative study of union and works council responses to algorithmic management in contact centres from two similar telecommunications companies in Germany and Norway. In both case studies, worker representatives mobilised collective voice institutions to protect worker privacy and discretion associated with remote monitoring and workforce management technologies. However, they relied on different sources of institutional power, connected to co-determination rights, enforcement of data protection laws, and labour cooperation structures.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"110 1","pages":"105 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating limits on algorithmic management in digitalised services: cases from Germany and Norway\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Doellgast, Ines Wagner, Sean O'Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10242589221143044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms are increasingly used to monitor employees and to automate management decisions. In this article, we ask how worker representatives adapt traditional collective voice institutions to regulate the adoption and use of these tools in the workplace. Our findings are based on a comparative study of union and works council responses to algorithmic management in contact centres from two similar telecommunications companies in Germany and Norway. In both case studies, worker representatives mobilised collective voice institutions to protect worker privacy and discretion associated with remote monitoring and workforce management technologies. However, they relied on different sources of institutional power, connected to co-determination rights, enforcement of data protection laws, and labour cooperation structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221143044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221143044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基于人工智能(AI)的算法越来越多地用于监控员工和自动化管理决策。在本文中,我们探讨了工人代表如何调整传统的集体发声制度,以规范这些工具在工作场所的采用和使用。我们的发现是基于对工会和劳资委员会对德国和挪威两家类似电信公司呼叫中心算法管理的反应的比较研究。在这两个案例中,工人代表动员了集体发声机构,以保护与远程监控和劳动力管理技术相关的工人隐私和自由裁量权。然而,它们依赖于不同的制度权力来源,这些权力与共同决策权、数据保护法的执行和劳动合作结构有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negotiating limits on algorithmic management in digitalised services: cases from Germany and Norway
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms are increasingly used to monitor employees and to automate management decisions. In this article, we ask how worker representatives adapt traditional collective voice institutions to regulate the adoption and use of these tools in the workplace. Our findings are based on a comparative study of union and works council responses to algorithmic management in contact centres from two similar telecommunications companies in Germany and Norway. In both case studies, worker representatives mobilised collective voice institutions to protect worker privacy and discretion associated with remote monitoring and workforce management technologies. However, they relied on different sources of institutional power, connected to co-determination rights, enforcement of data protection laws, and labour cooperation structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信