实验室中不同土壤中特定溢油和燃料渗透的时间周期和过程的估计

Sakari Halmemies , Siri Gröndahl , Keijo Nenonen , Tuula Tuhkanen
{"title":"实验室中不同土壤中特定溢油和燃料渗透的时间周期和过程的估计","authors":"Sakari Halmemies ,&nbsp;Siri Gröndahl ,&nbsp;Keijo Nenonen ,&nbsp;Tuula Tuhkanen","doi":"10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00002-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The subsequent distribution, fate and effects of inland oil spills from transportation (tanker trucks, rail road cars, <em>etc</em>.) in which fuels (diesel fuel, gasoline, home heating oils, <em>etc.</em>) are released to the environment have come under study as it was realized that the number of such accidents and accumulative volume of spilled fuels were quite large. The fate and behaviour of spilled fuel on soils mainly depend on soil type, amount and type of fuels both prevailing weather conditions. Experiments were simulated in the laboratory to determine the factors and processes and rates that influence and determine the distribution and abundance of fuels in soils following experimental spills to identify risks to ground waters from accidental spills.</p><p>In the laboratory, special column experiments, with soils found in Finland, found that the most vulnerable soil types (as expected) were the sandy soils, where hydrocarbon vertical seepage velocities in gravely sandy soils varied between 2.8 m/h (diesel oil) and 13.2 m/h (gasoline). However, one would expect in the environment for these velocities to be lower because of horizontal seepage and backpressure caused by saturated zone. Nevertheless, results suggest that in Finnish shallow soils gasoline-like fuels can easily reach the groundwater 2–4 m below the ground level.</p><p><span><span>Results suggest that emergency response actions must be taken by emergency services within a few hours to prevent pollution of the groundwater (short-term retention of gravely sand 3.1 wt.% for gasoline and 4.5 wt.% for diesel oil, respectively). The majority of Finnish soils are till, which had even better short-term retention capacities (5.8 wt.% for gasoline and 6.6 wt.% for diesel oil in sandy till), and where seepage velocities (0.1–0.2 m/h) were only a part of those determined for gravely sandy soils. In most cases emergency services has at least 2 h time to stop spreading of fuel to prevent pollution of the groundwater. The distribution processes for spilled fuel on ground can be described as: advection, </span>molecular diffusion<span> or mechanical dispersion, with the spreading type to be dependent on a soil type and its geology. In addition, weather conditions (especially temperature and wind speed), diameter of a pool and soil type, for gasoline-like volatile compounds vaporization can be very effective, so that only a portion of spilled oil penetrates into the soil. The data suggest that a spill of gasoline on soil with a hydraulic conductivity less than 1 Darcy (1×10</span></span><sup>−5</sup> m/s) during the summer time will mostly vaporize before seeping into the soil.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101181,"journal":{"name":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 451-465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00002-1","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the Time Periods and Processes for Penetration of Selected Spilled Oils and Fuels in Different Soils in the Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Sakari Halmemies ,&nbsp;Siri Gröndahl ,&nbsp;Keijo Nenonen ,&nbsp;Tuula Tuhkanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00002-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The subsequent distribution, fate and effects of inland oil spills from transportation (tanker trucks, rail road cars, <em>etc</em>.) in which fuels (diesel fuel, gasoline, home heating oils, <em>etc.</em>) are released to the environment have come under study as it was realized that the number of such accidents and accumulative volume of spilled fuels were quite large. The fate and behaviour of spilled fuel on soils mainly depend on soil type, amount and type of fuels both prevailing weather conditions. Experiments were simulated in the laboratory to determine the factors and processes and rates that influence and determine the distribution and abundance of fuels in soils following experimental spills to identify risks to ground waters from accidental spills.</p><p>In the laboratory, special column experiments, with soils found in Finland, found that the most vulnerable soil types (as expected) were the sandy soils, where hydrocarbon vertical seepage velocities in gravely sandy soils varied between 2.8 m/h (diesel oil) and 13.2 m/h (gasoline). However, one would expect in the environment for these velocities to be lower because of horizontal seepage and backpressure caused by saturated zone. Nevertheless, results suggest that in Finnish shallow soils gasoline-like fuels can easily reach the groundwater 2–4 m below the ground level.</p><p><span><span>Results suggest that emergency response actions must be taken by emergency services within a few hours to prevent pollution of the groundwater (short-term retention of gravely sand 3.1 wt.% for gasoline and 4.5 wt.% for diesel oil, respectively). The majority of Finnish soils are till, which had even better short-term retention capacities (5.8 wt.% for gasoline and 6.6 wt.% for diesel oil in sandy till), and where seepage velocities (0.1–0.2 m/h) were only a part of those determined for gravely sandy soils. In most cases emergency services has at least 2 h time to stop spreading of fuel to prevent pollution of the groundwater. The distribution processes for spilled fuel on ground can be described as: advection, </span>molecular diffusion<span> or mechanical dispersion, with the spreading type to be dependent on a soil type and its geology. In addition, weather conditions (especially temperature and wind speed), diameter of a pool and soil type, for gasoline-like volatile compounds vaporization can be very effective, so that only a portion of spilled oil penetrates into the soil. The data suggest that a spill of gasoline on soil with a hydraulic conductivity less than 1 Darcy (1×10</span></span><sup>−5</sup> m/s) during the summer time will mostly vaporize before seeping into the soil.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 451-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00002-1\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353256103000021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353256103000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

运输(油罐车、铁路车辆等)向环境释放燃料(柴油、汽油、家用取暖油等)的内陆溢油随后的分布、命运和影响,已经得到了研究,因为人们意识到这类事故的数量和泄漏燃料的累积量相当大。泄漏燃料在土壤上的命运和行为主要取决于土壤类型、燃料的数量和类型以及当时的天气条件。在实验室进行了模拟实验,以确定影响和确定实验性泄漏后土壤中燃料的分布和丰度的因素、过程和速率,以确定意外泄漏对地下水的风险。在实验室中,芬兰土壤的特殊柱实验发现,最脆弱的土壤类型(如预期的那样)是沙质土壤,在严重沙质土壤中,碳氢化合物的垂直渗透速度在2.8米/小时(柴油)和13.2米/小时(汽油)之间变化。然而,由于水平渗流和饱和带引起的反压力,在环境中这些速度会更低。然而,结果表明,在芬兰的浅层土壤中,类似汽油的燃料很容易进入地下2-4米的地下水。结果表明,应急服务必须在几小时内采取应急行动,以防止地下水污染(汽油和柴油的短期滞留量分别为3.1 wt.%和4.5 wt.%)。芬兰的大部分土壤都是土壤层,在砂质土壤层中具有更好的短期滞留能力(汽油5.8%,柴油6.6%),其渗透速度(0.1-0.2米/小时)仅是严重沙质土壤的一部分。在大多数情况下,应急服务至少有2小时的时间来停止燃料的扩散,以防止地下水受到污染。泄漏燃料在地面上的分布过程可以描述为:平流、分子扩散或机械扩散,其扩散类型取决于土壤类型及其地质情况。此外,天气条件(特别是温度和风速)、水池的直径和土壤类型,对于汽油类挥发性化合物的汽化可以非常有效,因此只有一部分溢油渗透到土壤中。数据表明,夏季时,当汽油泄漏在导水系数小于1达西(1×10−5 m/s)的土壤上时,在渗入土壤之前大部分会蒸发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of the Time Periods and Processes for Penetration of Selected Spilled Oils and Fuels in Different Soils in the Laboratory

The subsequent distribution, fate and effects of inland oil spills from transportation (tanker trucks, rail road cars, etc.) in which fuels (diesel fuel, gasoline, home heating oils, etc.) are released to the environment have come under study as it was realized that the number of such accidents and accumulative volume of spilled fuels were quite large. The fate and behaviour of spilled fuel on soils mainly depend on soil type, amount and type of fuels both prevailing weather conditions. Experiments were simulated in the laboratory to determine the factors and processes and rates that influence and determine the distribution and abundance of fuels in soils following experimental spills to identify risks to ground waters from accidental spills.

In the laboratory, special column experiments, with soils found in Finland, found that the most vulnerable soil types (as expected) were the sandy soils, where hydrocarbon vertical seepage velocities in gravely sandy soils varied between 2.8 m/h (diesel oil) and 13.2 m/h (gasoline). However, one would expect in the environment for these velocities to be lower because of horizontal seepage and backpressure caused by saturated zone. Nevertheless, results suggest that in Finnish shallow soils gasoline-like fuels can easily reach the groundwater 2–4 m below the ground level.

Results suggest that emergency response actions must be taken by emergency services within a few hours to prevent pollution of the groundwater (short-term retention of gravely sand 3.1 wt.% for gasoline and 4.5 wt.% for diesel oil, respectively). The majority of Finnish soils are till, which had even better short-term retention capacities (5.8 wt.% for gasoline and 6.6 wt.% for diesel oil in sandy till), and where seepage velocities (0.1–0.2 m/h) were only a part of those determined for gravely sandy soils. In most cases emergency services has at least 2 h time to stop spreading of fuel to prevent pollution of the groundwater. The distribution processes for spilled fuel on ground can be described as: advection, molecular diffusion or mechanical dispersion, with the spreading type to be dependent on a soil type and its geology. In addition, weather conditions (especially temperature and wind speed), diameter of a pool and soil type, for gasoline-like volatile compounds vaporization can be very effective, so that only a portion of spilled oil penetrates into the soil. The data suggest that a spill of gasoline on soil with a hydraulic conductivity less than 1 Darcy (1×10−5 m/s) during the summer time will mostly vaporize before seeping into the soil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信