市场、道德与(公正)价格:以土耳其循环经济为例

Demet Ş. Dinler
{"title":"市场、道德与(公正)价格:以土耳其循环经济为例","authors":"Demet Ş. Dinler","doi":"10.1108/S0190-128120190000039002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted amongst waste-pickers and recycling traders in the waste paper, plastic and scrap metal sectors, and engaging with literature from economic anthropology and history, as well as archival sources, this article documents changing perceptions of just price, morality and fairness in the Turkish recycling market. The paper suggests that multiple markets imply multiple prices, which are contingent and contested. When dealing with price mechanisms largely outside their control, actors tend to associate a fair price with the going market price, rather than factors such as state regulation. Approaches to morality and assessments of fairness become more ambigious when prices are mediated by actors’ own practices. These range from gift relations, to paternalism, envy and deception.","PeriodicalId":23043,"journal":{"name":"The Politics and Ethics of the Just Price","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market, Morality and (Just) Price: The Case of the Recycling Economy in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Demet Ş. Dinler\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0190-128120190000039002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted amongst waste-pickers and recycling traders in the waste paper, plastic and scrap metal sectors, and engaging with literature from economic anthropology and history, as well as archival sources, this article documents changing perceptions of just price, morality and fairness in the Turkish recycling market. The paper suggests that multiple markets imply multiple prices, which are contingent and contested. When dealing with price mechanisms largely outside their control, actors tend to associate a fair price with the going market price, rather than factors such as state regulation. Approaches to morality and assessments of fairness become more ambigious when prices are mediated by actors’ own practices. These range from gift relations, to paternalism, envy and deception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Politics and Ethics of the Just Price\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Politics and Ethics of the Just Price\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120190000039002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics and Ethics of the Just Price","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120190000039002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对废纸、塑料和废金属行业的拾荒者和回收商进行的民族志田野调查,并结合经济人类学和历史文献以及档案资料,本文记录了土耳其回收市场中对公正价格、道德和公平的看法的变化。本文认为,多重市场意味着多重价格,这些价格具有偶然性和竞争性。在处理很大程度上不受其控制的价格机制时,行为者倾向于将公平价格与现行市场价格联系起来,而不是与国家监管等因素联系起来。当价格由行为者自己的行为来调节时,道德和公平评估的方法变得更加模糊。这些问题包括礼物关系、家长式作风、嫉妒和欺骗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market, Morality and (Just) Price: The Case of the Recycling Economy in Turkey
By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted amongst waste-pickers and recycling traders in the waste paper, plastic and scrap metal sectors, and engaging with literature from economic anthropology and history, as well as archival sources, this article documents changing perceptions of just price, morality and fairness in the Turkish recycling market. The paper suggests that multiple markets imply multiple prices, which are contingent and contested. When dealing with price mechanisms largely outside their control, actors tend to associate a fair price with the going market price, rather than factors such as state regulation. Approaches to morality and assessments of fairness become more ambigious when prices are mediated by actors’ own practices. These range from gift relations, to paternalism, envy and deception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信