绿色企业,棕色环境

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Rupayan Pal, Prasenjit Banerjee, Pratik Thakkar, A. M. Tanvir Hussain
{"title":"绿色企业,棕色环境","authors":"Rupayan Pal,&nbsp;Prasenjit Banerjee,&nbsp;Pratik Thakkar,&nbsp;A. M. Tanvir Hussain","doi":"10.1111/manc.12394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We develop a theoretical model to examine the implication of a monopolist’s environmental consciousness, which induces it to adopt cleaner technology or to internalize negative environmental externalities of production or both, for the environment. Results show that greater environmental concern of the monopolist may damage the environment more, despite leading to lower emission intensity. This is true regardless of whether consumers value green production or not. This paper also draws implications of technology standard and emission tax as instruments for environmental regulation. This paper provides a theoretical underpinning of the <i>rebound effect</i> in production by showing that the voluntary pro-environmental compliance behavior may not always mitigate the rebound effect. This suggests that a regulator should be cautious while designing regulatory mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47546,"journal":{"name":"Manchester School","volume":"90 2","pages":"107-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green firm, brown environment\",\"authors\":\"Rupayan Pal,&nbsp;Prasenjit Banerjee,&nbsp;Pratik Thakkar,&nbsp;A. M. Tanvir Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/manc.12394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We develop a theoretical model to examine the implication of a monopolist’s environmental consciousness, which induces it to adopt cleaner technology or to internalize negative environmental externalities of production or both, for the environment. Results show that greater environmental concern of the monopolist may damage the environment more, despite leading to lower emission intensity. This is true regardless of whether consumers value green production or not. This paper also draws implications of technology standard and emission tax as instruments for environmental regulation. This paper provides a theoretical underpinning of the <i>rebound effect</i> in production by showing that the voluntary pro-environmental compliance behavior may not always mitigate the rebound effect. This suggests that a regulator should be cautious while designing regulatory mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manchester School\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"107-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manchester School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们开发了一个理论模型来检验垄断者的环境意识的含义,这促使它采用更清洁的技术或内化生产的负面环境外部性,或两者兼而有之。结果表明,垄断者对环境的关注越大,尽管排放强度越低,但对环境的破坏越大。不管消费者是否重视绿色生产,这都是事实。本文还提出了技术标准和排放税作为环境规制工具的启示。本文通过证明自愿的环保行为并不总是能够缓解生产中的反弹效应,为生产中的反弹效应提供了理论基础。这表明,监管机构在设计监管机制时应谨慎行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green firm, brown environment

We develop a theoretical model to examine the implication of a monopolist’s environmental consciousness, which induces it to adopt cleaner technology or to internalize negative environmental externalities of production or both, for the environment. Results show that greater environmental concern of the monopolist may damage the environment more, despite leading to lower emission intensity. This is true regardless of whether consumers value green production or not. This paper also draws implications of technology standard and emission tax as instruments for environmental regulation. This paper provides a theoretical underpinning of the rebound effect in production by showing that the voluntary pro-environmental compliance behavior may not always mitigate the rebound effect. This suggests that a regulator should be cautious while designing regulatory mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manchester School
Manchester School ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Manchester School was first published more than seventy years ago and has become a distinguished, internationally recognised, general economics journal. The Manchester School publishes high-quality research covering all areas of the economics discipline, although the editors particularly encourage original contributions, or authoritative surveys, in the fields of microeconomics (including industrial organisation and game theory), macroeconomics, econometrics (both theory and applied) and labour economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信