“挑战并让彼此负责:”社会工作教师对不文明行为的回应

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Njeri Kagotho, J. McClendon, S. Lane, Todd Vanidestine, M. Bogenschutz, Theresa D. Flowers, Lauren Wilson
{"title":"“挑战并让彼此负责:”社会工作教师对不文明行为的回应","authors":"Njeri Kagotho, J. McClendon, S. Lane, Todd Vanidestine, M. Bogenschutz, Theresa D. Flowers, Lauren Wilson","doi":"10.1080/23303131.2023.2209754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Incivility within social work education reflects patterns seen across higher education and within society. Previous work has found that social work faculty are reluctant to report incivility and have limited confidence in their ability to address it effectively. In order to address potential solutions, this paper uses qualitative data (n = 164) drawn from a larger survey of social work faculty in the United States. The exploratory analysis focuses on strategies social work faculty use when experiencing incivility and bullying themselves, and methods recommended by social work faculty to confront incivility administratively and systemically within the social work academy. Responses were coded into four themes: values-based responses, leadership/institutional responses, individual and faculty level responses, and faculty disengagement. These themes suggest opportunities and recommendations to move toward a civil social work academy. PRACTICE POINTS Academic faculty expect institutional leadership to have the skills to acknowledge and address incidents of incivility in the workplace. Social work faculty suggest a combination of values-based responses that tie workplace behavior and culture to professional values, institutional responses that support accountability and formal recognition for prosocial behavior, and establishing and maintaining positive relationships in the workplace. Social work faculty acknowledge and affirm the individual ethical mandate to address injurious workplace behavior and challenge institutional systems and patterns that reinforce workplace incivility.","PeriodicalId":46043,"journal":{"name":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","volume":"47 1","pages":"328 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Challenge and Hold One Another Accountable:” Social Work Faculty Respond to Incivility\",\"authors\":\"Njeri Kagotho, J. McClendon, S. Lane, Todd Vanidestine, M. Bogenschutz, Theresa D. Flowers, Lauren Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23303131.2023.2209754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Incivility within social work education reflects patterns seen across higher education and within society. Previous work has found that social work faculty are reluctant to report incivility and have limited confidence in their ability to address it effectively. In order to address potential solutions, this paper uses qualitative data (n = 164) drawn from a larger survey of social work faculty in the United States. The exploratory analysis focuses on strategies social work faculty use when experiencing incivility and bullying themselves, and methods recommended by social work faculty to confront incivility administratively and systemically within the social work academy. Responses were coded into four themes: values-based responses, leadership/institutional responses, individual and faculty level responses, and faculty disengagement. These themes suggest opportunities and recommendations to move toward a civil social work academy. PRACTICE POINTS Academic faculty expect institutional leadership to have the skills to acknowledge and address incidents of incivility in the workplace. Social work faculty suggest a combination of values-based responses that tie workplace behavior and culture to professional values, institutional responses that support accountability and formal recognition for prosocial behavior, and establishing and maintaining positive relationships in the workplace. Social work faculty acknowledge and affirm the individual ethical mandate to address injurious workplace behavior and challenge institutional systems and patterns that reinforce workplace incivility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"328 - 342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2209754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2209754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会工作教育中的不文明行为反映了高等教育和社会内部的模式。先前的研究发现,社会工作教师不愿意报告不文明行为,并且对他们有效解决这一问题的能力缺乏信心。为了解决潜在的解决方案,本文使用了定性数据(n = 164),这些数据来自美国社会工作学院的一项更大的调查。探索性分析侧重于社会工作教师在经历不文明行为和欺凌时使用的策略,以及社会工作学院内社会工作教师建议的在行政和系统上应对不文明行为的方法。回答分为四个主题:基于价值观的回答,领导/机构的回答,个人和教师层面的回答,以及教师的脱离。这些主题提出了向民间社会工作学院发展的机会和建议。实践要点学术教师期望机构领导有能力承认和处理工作场所的不文明事件。社会工作教师建议结合以价值观为基础的回应,将工作场所的行为和文化与专业价值观联系起来,支持问责制和对亲社会行为的正式认可的制度回应,以及在工作场所建立和维持积极的关系。社会工作教师承认并肯定个人的道德使命,以解决有害的工作场所行为,并挑战加强工作场所不文明的制度体系和模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Challenge and Hold One Another Accountable:” Social Work Faculty Respond to Incivility
ABSTRACT Incivility within social work education reflects patterns seen across higher education and within society. Previous work has found that social work faculty are reluctant to report incivility and have limited confidence in their ability to address it effectively. In order to address potential solutions, this paper uses qualitative data (n = 164) drawn from a larger survey of social work faculty in the United States. The exploratory analysis focuses on strategies social work faculty use when experiencing incivility and bullying themselves, and methods recommended by social work faculty to confront incivility administratively and systemically within the social work academy. Responses were coded into four themes: values-based responses, leadership/institutional responses, individual and faculty level responses, and faculty disengagement. These themes suggest opportunities and recommendations to move toward a civil social work academy. PRACTICE POINTS Academic faculty expect institutional leadership to have the skills to acknowledge and address incidents of incivility in the workplace. Social work faculty suggest a combination of values-based responses that tie workplace behavior and culture to professional values, institutional responses that support accountability and formal recognition for prosocial behavior, and establishing and maintaining positive relationships in the workplace. Social work faculty acknowledge and affirm the individual ethical mandate to address injurious workplace behavior and challenge institutional systems and patterns that reinforce workplace incivility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信