{"title":"第二语言学习者在第二语言写作论文中不同时间间隔的停顿:来自击键记录程序的证据","authors":"M. Mohsen","doi":"10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-180-202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Several studies have been conducted to analyse students’ pauses during first language and/or second language writing to indicate the magnitude of the underlying cognitive processes learners have. Majority of studies have examined students’ pauses at a threshold 200ms. However, little is known about recording second language learners' pauses at different pauses’ times over different types of genres. The current investigation reports a case study of L2 learners’ cognitive processes by recording their pauses (<500ms, <1000ms, and <2000ms) during L2 writing in response to multiple genres prompts. \nDesign / methodology / approach. Twenty-five postgraduate students were asked to write three essays over three weeks, and their writing processes were recorded using a keystroke logging program (Inputlog, 7, Leijten & van Waes, 2013). Data was triangulated using a log file from the keystroke logging program, a process graph for writing behavior through different stages, and a visual video recording of their captured screens during writing behaviours. \nFindings. Results found that the students paused over sentence and paragraph boundaries and their pauses between paragraphs were significantly higher in writing narrative essay than in their argumentative essays at pauses intervals <500 and <1000ms respectively, and in turn, their pauses between sentences in an argumentative essay were significantly higher than their pauses in a descriptive essay at <500, <1000 respectively. However, there were no significant differences across word boundaries over genre types. \nConclusions. The current study extends the previous literature in examining the underlying cognitive processes during L2 writing tasks as the trendy issue of psycholinguistics. Knowing the cognitive processes is crucial in diagnosing the students’ difficulties in writing L2 essays as advanced technology has the potential to explore intrusively the accurate cognitive processes learners involved during writing tasks. \nOriginality / value. This paper is innovative in examining a state-of-the-art issue and has implications to the field of psycholinguistics.","PeriodicalId":42961,"journal":{"name":"Psycholinguistics","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Language Learners’ Pauses Over Different Times Intervals in L2 Writing Essays: Evidence From a Keystroke Logging Program\",\"authors\":\"M. Mohsen\",\"doi\":\"10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-180-202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. Several studies have been conducted to analyse students’ pauses during first language and/or second language writing to indicate the magnitude of the underlying cognitive processes learners have. Majority of studies have examined students’ pauses at a threshold 200ms. However, little is known about recording second language learners' pauses at different pauses’ times over different types of genres. The current investigation reports a case study of L2 learners’ cognitive processes by recording their pauses (<500ms, <1000ms, and <2000ms) during L2 writing in response to multiple genres prompts. \\nDesign / methodology / approach. Twenty-five postgraduate students were asked to write three essays over three weeks, and their writing processes were recorded using a keystroke logging program (Inputlog, 7, Leijten & van Waes, 2013). Data was triangulated using a log file from the keystroke logging program, a process graph for writing behavior through different stages, and a visual video recording of their captured screens during writing behaviours. \\nFindings. Results found that the students paused over sentence and paragraph boundaries and their pauses between paragraphs were significantly higher in writing narrative essay than in their argumentative essays at pauses intervals <500 and <1000ms respectively, and in turn, their pauses between sentences in an argumentative essay were significantly higher than their pauses in a descriptive essay at <500, <1000 respectively. However, there were no significant differences across word boundaries over genre types. \\nConclusions. The current study extends the previous literature in examining the underlying cognitive processes during L2 writing tasks as the trendy issue of psycholinguistics. Knowing the cognitive processes is crucial in diagnosing the students’ difficulties in writing L2 essays as advanced technology has the potential to explore intrusively the accurate cognitive processes learners involved during writing tasks. \\nOriginality / value. This paper is innovative in examining a state-of-the-art issue and has implications to the field of psycholinguistics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycholinguistics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycholinguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-180-202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-180-202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的。有几项研究分析了学生在母语和/或第二语言写作时的停顿,以表明学习者潜在认知过程的重要性。大多数研究都是在200毫秒的阈值下检测学生的停顿。然而,关于记录第二语言学习者在不同停顿时间、不同类型的停顿,我们所知甚少。本研究通过记录二语学习者在回应多种体裁提示时的停顿(<500ms, <1000ms和<2000ms),对二语学习者的认知过程进行了个案研究。设计/方法/方法。25名研究生被要求在三周内写三篇论文,他们的写作过程使用键盘记录程序进行记录(Inputlog, 7, Leijten & van Waes, 2013)。数据使用来自击键记录程序的日志文件、不同阶段的写入行为的过程图以及在写入行为期间捕获的屏幕的可视视频记录进行三角测量。发现。结果发现,学生在叙事性文章中句子边界处和段落边界处的停顿时间分别在<500 ms和<1000ms时显著高于议论文,而在议论文中句子之间的停顿时间分别在<500 ms和<1000ms时显著高于描述性文章。然而,在不同的词边界和类型之间,没有显著的差异。结论。本研究是对二语写作任务中潜在认知过程研究的延伸,是心理语言学研究的热点问题。了解认知过程对于诊断学生在第二语言写作中的困难是至关重要的,因为先进的技术有可能侵入性地探索学习者在写作任务中所涉及的准确认知过程。独创性/价值。这篇论文在研究一个最新的问题方面具有创新性,对心理语言学领域具有启示意义。
Second Language Learners’ Pauses Over Different Times Intervals in L2 Writing Essays: Evidence From a Keystroke Logging Program
Purpose. Several studies have been conducted to analyse students’ pauses during first language and/or second language writing to indicate the magnitude of the underlying cognitive processes learners have. Majority of studies have examined students’ pauses at a threshold 200ms. However, little is known about recording second language learners' pauses at different pauses’ times over different types of genres. The current investigation reports a case study of L2 learners’ cognitive processes by recording their pauses (<500ms, <1000ms, and <2000ms) during L2 writing in response to multiple genres prompts.
Design / methodology / approach. Twenty-five postgraduate students were asked to write three essays over three weeks, and their writing processes were recorded using a keystroke logging program (Inputlog, 7, Leijten & van Waes, 2013). Data was triangulated using a log file from the keystroke logging program, a process graph for writing behavior through different stages, and a visual video recording of their captured screens during writing behaviours.
Findings. Results found that the students paused over sentence and paragraph boundaries and their pauses between paragraphs were significantly higher in writing narrative essay than in their argumentative essays at pauses intervals <500 and <1000ms respectively, and in turn, their pauses between sentences in an argumentative essay were significantly higher than their pauses in a descriptive essay at <500, <1000 respectively. However, there were no significant differences across word boundaries over genre types.
Conclusions. The current study extends the previous literature in examining the underlying cognitive processes during L2 writing tasks as the trendy issue of psycholinguistics. Knowing the cognitive processes is crucial in diagnosing the students’ difficulties in writing L2 essays as advanced technology has the potential to explore intrusively the accurate cognitive processes learners involved during writing tasks.
Originality / value. This paper is innovative in examining a state-of-the-art issue and has implications to the field of psycholinguistics.