Michael D. Watson, Joan B. Simon, Lenora D Nunnley
{"title":"特殊语言障碍识别:学校心理学家使用方法的调查","authors":"Michael D. Watson, Joan B. Simon, Lenora D Nunnley","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IDEA 2004 opened the door for states, and in some cases districts, to choose among three different methods for identifying children with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLDs). This study provides an in-depth look at SLD identification practices in a state that allows school psychologists to use any of the three methods. Eighty-four school psychologists, 53.8% of the state’s school psychology association members, completed an online survey about which methods they use for identifying students with SLDs, the reasons for their choice, and their professional training level and years of experience. The most frequently reported method of identification was the combination of Discrepancy/Regression and Response to Intervention. Approximately one third of participants indicated the primary reason they use a particular method is because of a suggestion by a colleague or supervisor. Neither years of experience nor training level were related to the use of a single versus combined method for identification. Limitations and implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"83 1","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SLD Identification: A Survey of Methods Used by School Psychologists\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Watson, Joan B. Simon, Lenora D Nunnley\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IDEA 2004 opened the door for states, and in some cases districts, to choose among three different methods for identifying children with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLDs). This study provides an in-depth look at SLD identification practices in a state that allows school psychologists to use any of the three methods. Eighty-four school psychologists, 53.8% of the state’s school psychology association members, completed an online survey about which methods they use for identifying students with SLDs, the reasons for their choice, and their professional training level and years of experience. The most frequently reported method of identification was the combination of Discrepancy/Regression and Response to Intervention. Approximately one third of participants indicated the primary reason they use a particular method is because of a suggestion by a colleague or supervisor. Neither years of experience nor training level were related to the use of a single versus combined method for identification. Limitations and implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"57-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
IDEA 2004为各州(在某些情况下是地区)在三种不同的识别特殊学习障碍儿童(SLDs)的方法中进行选择打开了大门。这项研究提供了一个深入的研究,在一个允许学校心理学家使用三种方法中的任何一种的状态下,特殊障碍识别实践。84名学校心理学家,占该州学校心理学协会成员的53.8%,完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及他们使用哪些方法来识别患有特殊障碍的学生,他们选择的原因,以及他们的专业培训水平和多年经验。最常报道的识别方法是差异/回归和干预反应的结合。大约三分之一的参与者表示,他们使用某种特定方法的主要原因是同事或主管的建议。经验年数和培训水平与使用单一或联合识别方法无关。讨论了局限性和影响。
SLD Identification: A Survey of Methods Used by School Psychologists
IDEA 2004 opened the door for states, and in some cases districts, to choose among three different methods for identifying children with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLDs). This study provides an in-depth look at SLD identification practices in a state that allows school psychologists to use any of the three methods. Eighty-four school psychologists, 53.8% of the state’s school psychology association members, completed an online survey about which methods they use for identifying students with SLDs, the reasons for their choice, and their professional training level and years of experience. The most frequently reported method of identification was the combination of Discrepancy/Regression and Response to Intervention. Approximately one third of participants indicated the primary reason they use a particular method is because of a suggestion by a colleague or supervisor. Neither years of experience nor training level were related to the use of a single versus combined method for identification. Limitations and implications are discussed.