儿童语言学习中的数字讲故事:方法、设计和可靠性综述

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Ong, Vahid Aryadoust
{"title":"儿童语言学习中的数字讲故事:方法、设计和可靠性综述","authors":"C. Ong, Vahid Aryadoust","doi":"10.58459/rptel.2023.18011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital storytelling (DS) is an innovative approach to language learning and teaching. Generally, DS refers to the form of storytelling that utilizes digital technology for expression. Scholars have established the value of DS in both traditional and non-traditional (online) classrooms as a tool to teach and learn languages. However, the research methods and standards of such studies continue to be overlooked even though the robustness of these studies needs to be established for the implementation of DS into the language curriculum for children. Thus, the present research conducted a systematic investigation of research methods, design and reliability in DS studies on children’s language learning. We identified and extracted 50 documents from the Scopus database that satisfied the criteria of inclusion. In the initial evaluation, we coded every paper for (a) the research method applied, (b) research design and (c) reliability investigation of the instruments. We observed that most studies in the dataset used qualitative methods (n = 24, 48%) and most examined the effect of DS on children’s written abilities (n = 25, 50%). The abilities of children to speak (n = 15, 30%) and read a specific language (n = 10, 20%) were investigated to a lesser extent. Yet, none of these studies investigated listening skills. Notably, more than 92% of DS studies on children language learning provided no evidence of reliability investigation. While we coded for eight reliability statistics in the DS dataset, only two of the indexes were identified. Among these methods, Cronbach’s α was most often used to examine internal reliability, whereas correlation coefficient was applied to establish external reliability. Based on these findings, we offer some suggestions and guidelines for future DS research.","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"11 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of digital storytelling in language learning in children: methods, design and reliability\",\"authors\":\"C. Ong, Vahid Aryadoust\",\"doi\":\"10.58459/rptel.2023.18011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital storytelling (DS) is an innovative approach to language learning and teaching. Generally, DS refers to the form of storytelling that utilizes digital technology for expression. Scholars have established the value of DS in both traditional and non-traditional (online) classrooms as a tool to teach and learn languages. However, the research methods and standards of such studies continue to be overlooked even though the robustness of these studies needs to be established for the implementation of DS into the language curriculum for children. Thus, the present research conducted a systematic investigation of research methods, design and reliability in DS studies on children’s language learning. We identified and extracted 50 documents from the Scopus database that satisfied the criteria of inclusion. In the initial evaluation, we coded every paper for (a) the research method applied, (b) research design and (c) reliability investigation of the instruments. We observed that most studies in the dataset used qualitative methods (n = 24, 48%) and most examined the effect of DS on children’s written abilities (n = 25, 50%). The abilities of children to speak (n = 15, 30%) and read a specific language (n = 10, 20%) were investigated to a lesser extent. Yet, none of these studies investigated listening skills. Notably, more than 92% of DS studies on children language learning provided no evidence of reliability investigation. While we coded for eight reliability statistics in the DS dataset, only two of the indexes were identified. Among these methods, Cronbach’s α was most often used to examine internal reliability, whereas correlation coefficient was applied to establish external reliability. Based on these findings, we offer some suggestions and guidelines for future DS research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字讲故事(DS)是一种创新的语言学习和教学方法。一般来说,DS指的是利用数字技术进行表达的叙事形式。学者们已经在传统和非传统(在线)课堂中确立了DS作为教授和学习语言的工具的价值。然而,这些研究的研究方法和标准仍然被忽视,尽管这些研究的稳健性需要建立起来,以便在儿童语言课程中实施DS。因此,本研究对儿童语言学习的DS研究的研究方法、设计和可靠性进行了系统的调查。我们从Scopus数据库中识别并提取了50篇符合纳入标准的文献。在最初的评估中,我们对每篇论文进行了编码(a)应用的研究方法,(b)研究设计和(c)仪器的可靠性调查。我们观察到,数据集中的大多数研究使用定性方法(n = 24, 48%),大多数研究考察了DS对儿童写作能力的影响(n = 25, 50%)。儿童说话(n = 15,30%)和阅读特定语言(n = 10,20%)的能力在较小程度上进行了调查。然而,这些研究都没有调查听力技巧。值得注意的是,超过92%的儿童语言学习的DS研究没有提供信度调查的证据。虽然我们在DS数据集中编码了8个可靠性统计,但只有两个索引被确定。在这些方法中,Cronbach’s α最常用于检验内部信度,而相关系数则用于建立外部信度。在此基础上,对今后的研究提出了一些建议和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of digital storytelling in language learning in children: methods, design and reliability
Digital storytelling (DS) is an innovative approach to language learning and teaching. Generally, DS refers to the form of storytelling that utilizes digital technology for expression. Scholars have established the value of DS in both traditional and non-traditional (online) classrooms as a tool to teach and learn languages. However, the research methods and standards of such studies continue to be overlooked even though the robustness of these studies needs to be established for the implementation of DS into the language curriculum for children. Thus, the present research conducted a systematic investigation of research methods, design and reliability in DS studies on children’s language learning. We identified and extracted 50 documents from the Scopus database that satisfied the criteria of inclusion. In the initial evaluation, we coded every paper for (a) the research method applied, (b) research design and (c) reliability investigation of the instruments. We observed that most studies in the dataset used qualitative methods (n = 24, 48%) and most examined the effect of DS on children’s written abilities (n = 25, 50%). The abilities of children to speak (n = 15, 30%) and read a specific language (n = 10, 20%) were investigated to a lesser extent. Yet, none of these studies investigated listening skills. Notably, more than 92% of DS studies on children language learning provided no evidence of reliability investigation. While we coded for eight reliability statistics in the DS dataset, only two of the indexes were identified. Among these methods, Cronbach’s α was most often used to examine internal reliability, whereas correlation coefficient was applied to establish external reliability. Based on these findings, we offer some suggestions and guidelines for future DS research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信