共同基金的失误

Manag. Sci. Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4366
V. Atanasov, John J. Merrick, Philipp Schuster
{"title":"共同基金的失误","authors":"V. Atanasov, John J. Merrick, Philipp Schuster","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study mismarking of newly purchased odd lot and two classes of round lot structured product positions in mutual funds. Such mismarking artificially inflates net asset values and overstates cumulative returns. Applied to funds launched after January 2010, a simulation-tested mismarking fund filter identifies 12 Highly Questionable funds managing $75 billion. The performance of these funds matches closely the predicted pattern of mismarking: extremely high alpha and skewness, particularly immediately after launch. We show that structured product mismarking can seriously inflate return-since-inception metrics. We also provide evidence consistent with return smoothing for one quarter of the sample structured product funds. The inflated performance metrics benefit fund managers through significantly higher Sharpe ratios, Morningstar ratings, and asset growth but cause material losses to later investor cohorts. This paper was accepted by Agostino Capponi, finance.","PeriodicalId":18208,"journal":{"name":"Manag. Sci.","volume":"5 1","pages":"1275-1300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mismarking in Mutual Funds\",\"authors\":\"V. Atanasov, John J. Merrick, Philipp Schuster\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study mismarking of newly purchased odd lot and two classes of round lot structured product positions in mutual funds. Such mismarking artificially inflates net asset values and overstates cumulative returns. Applied to funds launched after January 2010, a simulation-tested mismarking fund filter identifies 12 Highly Questionable funds managing $75 billion. The performance of these funds matches closely the predicted pattern of mismarking: extremely high alpha and skewness, particularly immediately after launch. We show that structured product mismarking can seriously inflate return-since-inception metrics. We also provide evidence consistent with return smoothing for one quarter of the sample structured product funds. The inflated performance metrics benefit fund managers through significantly higher Sharpe ratios, Morningstar ratings, and asset growth but cause material losses to later investor cohorts. This paper was accepted by Agostino Capponi, finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manag. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1275-1300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manag. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manag. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究了共同基金中新买入的奇数手和两类圆手结构性产品头寸的错标问题。这种错误标记人为地夸大了资产净值,夸大了累计回报。应用于2010年1月以后成立的基金,一个经过模拟测试的错误标记基金过滤器识别出12只高度可疑的基金,管理着750亿美元。这些基金的表现与预测的错标模式非常吻合:极高的alpha值和偏度,尤其是在刚推出后。我们表明,结构化产品的错误标记会严重夸大自开始以来的回报指标。我们还提供了与四分之一样本结构性产品基金的收益平滑一致的证据。夸大的业绩指标通过显著提高夏普比率、晨星评级和资产增长,使基金经理受益,但对后来的投资者群体造成重大损失。这篇论文被金融学的阿戈斯蒂诺·卡波尼接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mismarking in Mutual Funds
We study mismarking of newly purchased odd lot and two classes of round lot structured product positions in mutual funds. Such mismarking artificially inflates net asset values and overstates cumulative returns. Applied to funds launched after January 2010, a simulation-tested mismarking fund filter identifies 12 Highly Questionable funds managing $75 billion. The performance of these funds matches closely the predicted pattern of mismarking: extremely high alpha and skewness, particularly immediately after launch. We show that structured product mismarking can seriously inflate return-since-inception metrics. We also provide evidence consistent with return smoothing for one quarter of the sample structured product funds. The inflated performance metrics benefit fund managers through significantly higher Sharpe ratios, Morningstar ratings, and asset growth but cause material losses to later investor cohorts. This paper was accepted by Agostino Capponi, finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信