{"title":"对东亚蒙面社会历史的思考","authors":"Jaehwan Hyun, Akihisa Setoguchi, M. Brazelton","doi":"10.1080/18752160.2021.2015125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of face masks has become a very popular topic in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for news reporters and public health experts. In mass media, history is spotlighted to find answers to the question “why do Asians wear masks” despite the lack of scientific evidence—which sociologist Mitsutoshi Horii, the author of Masks and the Japanese マスクと日本人 [Masuku to nihonjin], has been ceaselessly asked by journalists after the coronavirus outbreak (Horii 2020). The answer has been sought mainly in terms of cultural norms. BBC News explained that mask-wearing symbolizes politeness in Asian countries, while The New York Times found the prevalent mask-wearing in Asia over the West from “Asia’s collectivism” (Breeden et al. 2020; Wong 2020). A short commentary written by Chinese scholars at the University of Oxford that appeared in The Lancet followed the cultural norm thesis, claiming that Asia’s societal and cultural paradigm supports mask-usage hygienic practices without any empirical evidence (Feng et al. 2020). Practical reasons are suggested as well. In contrast to the “West,” Asian people have gone through frequent epidemic outbreaks, such as the 2002–2004 SARS crisis, so that they find it more acceptable to cover their faces (Jennings 2020). While sharing the questions addressed by mass media, medical professionals use mask history in more didactic ways. After national and international quarantine authorities reconsidered the role of mass masking in preventing community transmission in the early summer of 2020, they began to cite the long history of mask usage to halt the spread of epidemics—despite a lack of scientific understanding—and suggest that it is still a “simple but powerful tool to help combat” the coronavirus (Issacs 2020; Matuschek et al. 2020; Ike et al. 2021). In this narrative, the Manchurian Plague of 1910–1911 is","PeriodicalId":45255,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"108 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Reflections on the History of Masked Societies in East Asia\",\"authors\":\"Jaehwan Hyun, Akihisa Setoguchi, M. Brazelton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18752160.2021.2015125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The history of face masks has become a very popular topic in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for news reporters and public health experts. In mass media, history is spotlighted to find answers to the question “why do Asians wear masks” despite the lack of scientific evidence—which sociologist Mitsutoshi Horii, the author of Masks and the Japanese マスクと日本人 [Masuku to nihonjin], has been ceaselessly asked by journalists after the coronavirus outbreak (Horii 2020). The answer has been sought mainly in terms of cultural norms. BBC News explained that mask-wearing symbolizes politeness in Asian countries, while The New York Times found the prevalent mask-wearing in Asia over the West from “Asia’s collectivism” (Breeden et al. 2020; Wong 2020). A short commentary written by Chinese scholars at the University of Oxford that appeared in The Lancet followed the cultural norm thesis, claiming that Asia’s societal and cultural paradigm supports mask-usage hygienic practices without any empirical evidence (Feng et al. 2020). Practical reasons are suggested as well. In contrast to the “West,” Asian people have gone through frequent epidemic outbreaks, such as the 2002–2004 SARS crisis, so that they find it more acceptable to cover their faces (Jennings 2020). While sharing the questions addressed by mass media, medical professionals use mask history in more didactic ways. After national and international quarantine authorities reconsidered the role of mass masking in preventing community transmission in the early summer of 2020, they began to cite the long history of mask usage to halt the spread of epidemics—despite a lack of scientific understanding—and suggest that it is still a “simple but powerful tool to help combat” the coronavirus (Issacs 2020; Matuschek et al. 2020; Ike et al. 2021). In this narrative, the Manchurian Plague of 1910–1911 is\",\"PeriodicalId\":45255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2021.2015125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2021.2015125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
鉴于新冠肺炎大流行,口罩的历史已经成为一个非常热门的话题,特别是对新闻记者和公共卫生专家来说。在大众媒体中,尽管缺乏科学证据,但历史仍然受到关注,以寻找“为什么亚洲人戴口罩”这个问题的答案——《口罩和日本人》的作者、社会学家堀井光敏在冠状病毒爆发后不断被记者问到这个问题(堀井2020)。人们主要从文化规范的角度来寻找答案。BBC新闻解释说,在亚洲国家,戴口罩象征着礼貌,而《纽约时报》则认为,“亚洲集体主义”(Breeden et al. 2020;黄2020)。牛津大学的中国学者在《柳叶刀》上发表的一篇简短评论遵循了文化规范的论点,声称亚洲的社会和文化范式支持使用口罩的卫生习惯,但没有任何经验证据(Feng etal . 2020)。实际原因也被提出。与“西方”相比,亚洲人经历了频繁的流行病爆发,例如2002-2004年的SARS危机,因此他们更容易接受遮住脸(Jennings 2020)。在分享大众媒体所提出的问题的同时,医疗专业人员以更具说教性的方式使用了口罩历史。在国家和国际检疫当局在2020年初夏重新考虑大规模口罩在预防社区传播方面的作用后,他们开始引用口罩使用的悠久历史来阻止流行病的传播——尽管缺乏科学的理解——并表示它仍然是“帮助对抗冠状病毒的简单但强大的工具”(Issacs 2020;Matuschek et al. 2020;Ike et al. 2021)。在这种叙述中,1910-1911年的满洲瘟疫是
Some Reflections on the History of Masked Societies in East Asia
The history of face masks has become a very popular topic in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for news reporters and public health experts. In mass media, history is spotlighted to find answers to the question “why do Asians wear masks” despite the lack of scientific evidence—which sociologist Mitsutoshi Horii, the author of Masks and the Japanese マスクと日本人 [Masuku to nihonjin], has been ceaselessly asked by journalists after the coronavirus outbreak (Horii 2020). The answer has been sought mainly in terms of cultural norms. BBC News explained that mask-wearing symbolizes politeness in Asian countries, while The New York Times found the prevalent mask-wearing in Asia over the West from “Asia’s collectivism” (Breeden et al. 2020; Wong 2020). A short commentary written by Chinese scholars at the University of Oxford that appeared in The Lancet followed the cultural norm thesis, claiming that Asia’s societal and cultural paradigm supports mask-usage hygienic practices without any empirical evidence (Feng et al. 2020). Practical reasons are suggested as well. In contrast to the “West,” Asian people have gone through frequent epidemic outbreaks, such as the 2002–2004 SARS crisis, so that they find it more acceptable to cover their faces (Jennings 2020). While sharing the questions addressed by mass media, medical professionals use mask history in more didactic ways. After national and international quarantine authorities reconsidered the role of mass masking in preventing community transmission in the early summer of 2020, they began to cite the long history of mask usage to halt the spread of epidemics—despite a lack of scientific understanding—and suggest that it is still a “simple but powerful tool to help combat” the coronavirus (Issacs 2020; Matuschek et al. 2020; Ike et al. 2021). In this narrative, the Manchurian Plague of 1910–1911 is