土壤植物空气水(SPAW)模型在土壤性质变化下的适用性和敏感性

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
A. Saha, John McMaine
{"title":"土壤植物空气水(SPAW)模型在土壤性质变化下的适用性和敏感性","authors":"A. Saha, John McMaine","doi":"10.13031/ja.15306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights Changes to soil properties and precipitation scenarios significantly affect the water balance in agro-hydrology. SPAW model is sensitive to simulated runoff and infiltration, but it has limitations in responding to soil compaction and organic matter change. Increasing organic matter (1% to 5%) did not significantly affect runoff or infiltration in silty and sandy loam soil. Low precipitation generates significantly lower runoff (%) and higher infiltration. Abstract. Agricultural practices can change soil properties and the amount of runoff generated from a landscape. Modeling results could be significantly different than expected if the web soil survey or other commonly used remote sensing applications are used as model inputs without site verification. This study assessed the applicability and sensitivity of the Soil-Plant-Air-Water (SPAW) Model for simulating the runoff (%) and infiltration (%) components of the water balance for various soil physical properties, cover crop, and weather variables. Soil profiles in 135 combinations were developed with three soil classes (sandy loam, silt loam, and clay), five organic matter levels (1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), three levels of compaction (low, medium, and high), and three topsoil layer thicknesses (7.6 cm, 11.4 cm, and 15 cm). Also, three cover crop treatments were simulated by modifying surface cover and evapotranspiration during the non-growing season. Finally, two precipitation regimes were considered (Iowa City, IA, as high precipitation and Brookings, SD, as low precipitation) to simulate runoff and infiltration. In total, 810 scenarios were run, resulting in over 300 million data points. This study confirmed that soil texture, bulk density, and topsoil thickness significantly (p<0.01) influence runoff generation and infiltration percentage based on the water balance criterion. Interestingly, the SPAW model had no significant response on runoff (%) and infiltration (%) to organic matter levels changing from 1% to 5%. This simulation demonstrates that runoff estimations can be significantly influenced by soil properties that can change due to agricultural conservation practices (ACPs) or, conversely, by compaction events. Inputs to models must account for these changes rather than relying only on historical or remote sensing inputs. Keywords: Agricultural conservation practices, Conservation agriculture, Field hydrology, Infiltration, Runoff, SPAW.","PeriodicalId":29714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASABE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability and Sensitivity of Field Hydrology Modeling by the Soil Plant Air Water (SPAW) Model Under Changes in Soil Properties\",\"authors\":\"A. Saha, John McMaine\",\"doi\":\"10.13031/ja.15306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights Changes to soil properties and precipitation scenarios significantly affect the water balance in agro-hydrology. SPAW model is sensitive to simulated runoff and infiltration, but it has limitations in responding to soil compaction and organic matter change. Increasing organic matter (1% to 5%) did not significantly affect runoff or infiltration in silty and sandy loam soil. Low precipitation generates significantly lower runoff (%) and higher infiltration. Abstract. Agricultural practices can change soil properties and the amount of runoff generated from a landscape. Modeling results could be significantly different than expected if the web soil survey or other commonly used remote sensing applications are used as model inputs without site verification. This study assessed the applicability and sensitivity of the Soil-Plant-Air-Water (SPAW) Model for simulating the runoff (%) and infiltration (%) components of the water balance for various soil physical properties, cover crop, and weather variables. Soil profiles in 135 combinations were developed with three soil classes (sandy loam, silt loam, and clay), five organic matter levels (1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), three levels of compaction (low, medium, and high), and three topsoil layer thicknesses (7.6 cm, 11.4 cm, and 15 cm). Also, three cover crop treatments were simulated by modifying surface cover and evapotranspiration during the non-growing season. Finally, two precipitation regimes were considered (Iowa City, IA, as high precipitation and Brookings, SD, as low precipitation) to simulate runoff and infiltration. In total, 810 scenarios were run, resulting in over 300 million data points. This study confirmed that soil texture, bulk density, and topsoil thickness significantly (p<0.01) influence runoff generation and infiltration percentage based on the water balance criterion. Interestingly, the SPAW model had no significant response on runoff (%) and infiltration (%) to organic matter levels changing from 1% to 5%. This simulation demonstrates that runoff estimations can be significantly influenced by soil properties that can change due to agricultural conservation practices (ACPs) or, conversely, by compaction events. Inputs to models must account for these changes rather than relying only on historical or remote sensing inputs. Keywords: Agricultural conservation practices, Conservation agriculture, Field hydrology, Infiltration, Runoff, SPAW.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤性质和降水情景的变化对农业水文的水分平衡有显著影响。SPAW模型对模拟径流和入渗较为敏感,但在响应土壤压实和有机质变化方面存在局限性。增加有机质(1% ~ 5%)对粉质和砂质壤土的径流和入渗影响不显著。低降水量显著降低了径流量(%),提高了入渗。摘要农业实践可以改变土壤性质和从景观中产生的径流量。如果在没有现场验证的情况下,使用网土调查或其他常用遥感应用作为模型输入,建模结果可能与预期有很大差异。本研究评估了土壤-植物-空气-水(SPAW)模型在各种土壤物理性质、覆盖作物和天气变量下模拟水平衡的径流(%)和入渗(%)成分的适用性和敏感性。135种组合的土壤剖面包括3种土壤类型(砂质壤土、粉质壤土和粘土)、5种有机质水平(1%、2%、3%、4%和5%)、3种压实度(低、中、高)和3种表土层厚度(7.6 cm、11.4 cm和15 cm)。通过改变地表覆盖和非生长期的蒸散量,模拟了3种覆盖作物处理。最后,考虑两种降水制度(爱荷华州的爱荷华市为高降水,SD的布鲁金斯为低降水)来模拟径流和入渗。总共运行了810个场景,产生了超过3亿个数据点。本研究证实,土壤质地、容重和表土厚度对水量平衡准则下的产流和入渗百分比有显著影响(p<0.01)。有趣的是,SPAW模型对径流(%)和入渗(%)对有机质水平在1% ~ 5%之间的变化没有显著的响应。该模拟表明,径流估计可能受到土壤性质的显著影响,土壤性质可能因农业保护措施(ACPs)而改变,相反,也可能受到压实事件的影响。模型的输入必须考虑到这些变化,而不是仅仅依赖于历史或遥感输入。关键词:农业保护性措施,保护性农业,田间水文,入渗,径流,SPAW
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability and Sensitivity of Field Hydrology Modeling by the Soil Plant Air Water (SPAW) Model Under Changes in Soil Properties
Highlights Changes to soil properties and precipitation scenarios significantly affect the water balance in agro-hydrology. SPAW model is sensitive to simulated runoff and infiltration, but it has limitations in responding to soil compaction and organic matter change. Increasing organic matter (1% to 5%) did not significantly affect runoff or infiltration in silty and sandy loam soil. Low precipitation generates significantly lower runoff (%) and higher infiltration. Abstract. Agricultural practices can change soil properties and the amount of runoff generated from a landscape. Modeling results could be significantly different than expected if the web soil survey or other commonly used remote sensing applications are used as model inputs without site verification. This study assessed the applicability and sensitivity of the Soil-Plant-Air-Water (SPAW) Model for simulating the runoff (%) and infiltration (%) components of the water balance for various soil physical properties, cover crop, and weather variables. Soil profiles in 135 combinations were developed with three soil classes (sandy loam, silt loam, and clay), five organic matter levels (1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), three levels of compaction (low, medium, and high), and three topsoil layer thicknesses (7.6 cm, 11.4 cm, and 15 cm). Also, three cover crop treatments were simulated by modifying surface cover and evapotranspiration during the non-growing season. Finally, two precipitation regimes were considered (Iowa City, IA, as high precipitation and Brookings, SD, as low precipitation) to simulate runoff and infiltration. In total, 810 scenarios were run, resulting in over 300 million data points. This study confirmed that soil texture, bulk density, and topsoil thickness significantly (p<0.01) influence runoff generation and infiltration percentage based on the water balance criterion. Interestingly, the SPAW model had no significant response on runoff (%) and infiltration (%) to organic matter levels changing from 1% to 5%. This simulation demonstrates that runoff estimations can be significantly influenced by soil properties that can change due to agricultural conservation practices (ACPs) or, conversely, by compaction events. Inputs to models must account for these changes rather than relying only on historical or remote sensing inputs. Keywords: Agricultural conservation practices, Conservation agriculture, Field hydrology, Infiltration, Runoff, SPAW.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信