在全国漫游下,大卫会更有可能和安吉拉通话吗?

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
A. Basso, Pietro Crocioni
{"title":"在全国漫游下,大卫会更有可能和安吉拉通话吗?","authors":"A. Basso, Pietro Crocioni","doi":"10.1515/rne-2016-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The UK Government has proposed national roaming to ensure that consumers may use rival networks in areas where their own operator does not offer (network) coverage (these are known as partial not-spots). The proposed policy aimed at increasing the likelihood of callers being able to make and receive calls. While this may raise a number of concerns in terms of possible harm to consumers, this article only focuses on one question: whether national roaming, rather than making it more likely that consumers in partial not-spots may be able make and receive calls, may achieve the very opposite outcome. This is because, under national roaming, and depending on the level of the charge, operators may have the incentive to withdraw their network coverage and roam instead. We also analyse the implications for dual coverage areas.","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"101 1","pages":"63 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would David be More Likely to Speak to Angela under National Roaming?\",\"authors\":\"A. Basso, Pietro Crocioni\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rne-2016-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The UK Government has proposed national roaming to ensure that consumers may use rival networks in areas where their own operator does not offer (network) coverage (these are known as partial not-spots). The proposed policy aimed at increasing the likelihood of callers being able to make and receive calls. While this may raise a number of concerns in terms of possible harm to consumers, this article only focuses on one question: whether national roaming, rather than making it more likely that consumers in partial not-spots may be able make and receive calls, may achieve the very opposite outcome. This is because, under national roaming, and depending on the level of the charge, operators may have the incentive to withdraw their network coverage and roam instead. We also analyse the implications for dual coverage areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

英国政府提出了全国漫游,以确保消费者可以在他们自己的运营商没有提供(网络)覆盖的地区使用竞争对手的网络(这些被称为部分非点)。拟议的政策旨在增加呼叫者能够拨打和接听电话的可能性。虽然这可能会引起许多关于可能对消费者造成伤害的担忧,但本文只关注一个问题:全国漫游是否会达到完全相反的结果,而不是使部分非地区的消费者更有可能拨打和接听电话。这是因为,在全国漫游的情况下,根据收费水平的不同,运营商可能会有动力撤回他们的网络覆盖范围,转而漫游。我们还分析了双重覆盖区域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Would David be More Likely to Speak to Angela under National Roaming?
Abstract The UK Government has proposed national roaming to ensure that consumers may use rival networks in areas where their own operator does not offer (network) coverage (these are known as partial not-spots). The proposed policy aimed at increasing the likelihood of callers being able to make and receive calls. While this may raise a number of concerns in terms of possible harm to consumers, this article only focuses on one question: whether national roaming, rather than making it more likely that consumers in partial not-spots may be able make and receive calls, may achieve the very opposite outcome. This is because, under national roaming, and depending on the level of the charge, operators may have the incentive to withdraw their network coverage and roam instead. We also analyse the implications for dual coverage areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信