基于存在事实的认同:对威廉的回复

Philosophic research and analysis Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI:10.1093/analys/anad003

Neil Mehta

{"title":"基于存在事实的认同:对威廉的回复","authors":"Neil Mehta","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What grounds facts of the form <x= x>? One promising answer is: facts of the form <xexists>. A different promising answer is: xitself. Isaac Wilhelm has recently argued that the second answer is superior to the first. In this paper, I rebut his argument.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounding identity in existence facts: a reply to Wilhelm\",\"authors\":\"Neil Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/analys/anad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n What grounds facts of the form <x= x>? One promising answer is: facts of the form <xexists>. A different promising answer is: xitself. Isaac Wilhelm has recently argued that the second answer is superior to the first. In this paper, I rebut his argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophic research and analysis\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophic research and analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophic research and analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

形式的事实依据是什么?一个有希望的答案是:形式的事实。另一个有希望的答案是:x本身。艾萨克•威廉(Isaac Wilhelm)最近提出，第二个答案优于第一个答案。在本文中，我反驳了他的论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Grounding identity in existence facts: a reply to Wilhelm

What grounds facts of the form ? One promising answer is: facts of the form . A different promising answer is: xitself. Isaac Wilhelm has recently argued that the second answer is superior to the first. In this paper, I rebut his argument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophic research and analysis

自引率

0.00%

发文量