单位-威布尔分布:不同的估计方法

H. Gül
{"title":"单位-威布尔分布:不同的估计方法","authors":"H. Gül","doi":"10.31466/kfbd.1239446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the unit-Weibull (UW) distribution is used quite effectively in analyzing lifetime data. The main goal of this article is to investigate the performance of seven estimation methods, namely maximum likelihood (ML), least square (LS), weighted least square (WLS), Anderson-Darling (AD), right-tail Anderson-Darling (RAD), Cramer-von-Mises (CVM) and percentile (PCE) for parameter estimation. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is considered to compare the performances of these methods through biases and mean square errors (MSEs). The numerical results show that the PCE estimator has significantly smaller MSE value for different sample sizes and parameter values in most cases. In addition, the ML and LS estimators have lower bias values than the other estimators in general. Finally, a real data set is presented for illustrative purposes.","PeriodicalId":17795,"journal":{"name":"Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unit-Weibull Distribution: Different Method of Estimations\",\"authors\":\"H. Gül\",\"doi\":\"10.31466/kfbd.1239446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, the unit-Weibull (UW) distribution is used quite effectively in analyzing lifetime data. The main goal of this article is to investigate the performance of seven estimation methods, namely maximum likelihood (ML), least square (LS), weighted least square (WLS), Anderson-Darling (AD), right-tail Anderson-Darling (RAD), Cramer-von-Mises (CVM) and percentile (PCE) for parameter estimation. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is considered to compare the performances of these methods through biases and mean square errors (MSEs). The numerical results show that the PCE estimator has significantly smaller MSE value for different sample sizes and parameter values in most cases. In addition, the ML and LS estimators have lower bias values than the other estimators in general. Finally, a real data set is presented for illustrative purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1239446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1239446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,单位威布尔分布在寿命数据分析中得到了很好的应用。本文的主要目的是研究7种估计方法的性能,即最大似然(ML)、最小二乘(LS)、加权最小二乘(WLS)、安德森-达林(AD)、右尾安德森-达林(RAD)、克莱默-范-米塞斯(CVM)和百分位数(PCE)参数估计。通过广泛的蒙特卡罗模拟研究,通过偏差和均方误差(MSEs)来比较这些方法的性能。数值结果表明,在大多数情况下,PCE估计器在不同的样本量和参数值下具有显著较小的MSE值。此外,ML和LS估计器通常比其他估计器具有更低的偏差值。最后,为了说明问题,给出了一个真实的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unit-Weibull Distribution: Different Method of Estimations
Recently, the unit-Weibull (UW) distribution is used quite effectively in analyzing lifetime data. The main goal of this article is to investigate the performance of seven estimation methods, namely maximum likelihood (ML), least square (LS), weighted least square (WLS), Anderson-Darling (AD), right-tail Anderson-Darling (RAD), Cramer-von-Mises (CVM) and percentile (PCE) for parameter estimation. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is considered to compare the performances of these methods through biases and mean square errors (MSEs). The numerical results show that the PCE estimator has significantly smaller MSE value for different sample sizes and parameter values in most cases. In addition, the ML and LS estimators have lower bias values than the other estimators in general. Finally, a real data set is presented for illustrative purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信