日本人对契约的态度:争论中的经验皱纹

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Michael K. Young, Masanobu Kato, A. Fujimoto
{"title":"日本人对契约的态度:争论中的经验皱纹","authors":"Michael K. Young, Masanobu Kato, A. Fujimoto","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.363400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we re-examine, from an empirical perspective, the debate about Japanese legal consciousness. In particular, we analyze the result of a survey we conducted among Japanese law and business students to determine their attitudes towards the use of contracts as a device to order economic exchanges. We hypothesized that if the generally accepted view of Japanese attitudes towards law were correct, Japanese respondents who had not studied law and therefore possessed the \"traditional Japanese attitudes\" towards law would be relatively disinclined to urge strict compliance with the terms of a contract. Respondents who had studied law, on the other hand, we hypothesized, would be more inclined to see the contract enforced as written. In other words, legal education would imbue in its recipients an \"American\" attitude towards law, that is, a preference for strict adherence to the precise contractual terms. The data suggested just the opposite. Law students had a decided preference, over their non-law counterparts, for flexibility in the interpretation and execution of contracts. The more law students studied, the stronger that preference. This preference seems to decline, however, when law students are placed in an advisory, as opposed to advocacy role. We also observed significant gender based differences, with women preferring flexibility to a significant degree over men. Some regional differences were also observed, but were comparatively minor. Finally, we also explored whether respondents were inclined to favor a company because it was Japanese. Generally speaking, we did not observe such bias in most cases. But interesting exceptions were found. For example, we observed some degree of bias against Japanese companies in cases in which the opposing company was Korean or Chinese. And when the opposing company was American, only law students exhibited any national bias in favor of the Japanese company. Non-law students did not show any bias in favor of companies from Japan in any of the samples.","PeriodicalId":47068,"journal":{"name":"George Washington Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japanese Attitudes Towards Contracts: An Empirical Wrinkle in the Debate\",\"authors\":\"Michael K. Young, Masanobu Kato, A. Fujimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.363400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we re-examine, from an empirical perspective, the debate about Japanese legal consciousness. In particular, we analyze the result of a survey we conducted among Japanese law and business students to determine their attitudes towards the use of contracts as a device to order economic exchanges. We hypothesized that if the generally accepted view of Japanese attitudes towards law were correct, Japanese respondents who had not studied law and therefore possessed the \\\"traditional Japanese attitudes\\\" towards law would be relatively disinclined to urge strict compliance with the terms of a contract. Respondents who had studied law, on the other hand, we hypothesized, would be more inclined to see the contract enforced as written. In other words, legal education would imbue in its recipients an \\\"American\\\" attitude towards law, that is, a preference for strict adherence to the precise contractual terms. The data suggested just the opposite. Law students had a decided preference, over their non-law counterparts, for flexibility in the interpretation and execution of contracts. The more law students studied, the stronger that preference. This preference seems to decline, however, when law students are placed in an advisory, as opposed to advocacy role. We also observed significant gender based differences, with women preferring flexibility to a significant degree over men. Some regional differences were also observed, but were comparatively minor. Finally, we also explored whether respondents were inclined to favor a company because it was Japanese. Generally speaking, we did not observe such bias in most cases. But interesting exceptions were found. For example, we observed some degree of bias against Japanese companies in cases in which the opposing company was Korean or Chinese. And when the opposing company was American, only law students exhibited any national bias in favor of the Japanese company. Non-law students did not show any bias in favor of companies from Japan in any of the samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"George Washington Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"George Washington Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.363400\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Washington Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.363400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文从实证的角度重新审视日本法律意识之争。特别是,我们分析了我们在日本法律和商业学生中进行的一项调查的结果,以确定他们对使用合同作为安排经济交流的手段的态度。我们假设,如果普遍接受的关于日本人对待法律的态度的观点是正确的,那么没有学习过法律并因此对法律持有“传统日本态度”的日本受访者将相对不愿意敦促严格遵守合同条款。另一方面,我们假设,学习过法律的受访者更倾向于看到合同按照书面形式执行。换句话说,法律教育将向其接受者灌输一种对法律的“美国”态度,即偏爱严格遵守确切的合同条款。数据显示的情况正好相反。与非法律专业的学生相比,法律专业的学生更倾向于灵活地解释和执行合同。学法律的学生越多,这种偏好就越强烈。然而,当法律系学生被置于顾问而不是辩护角色时,这种偏好似乎有所下降。我们还观察到明显的性别差异,女性比男性更喜欢灵活性。也观察到一些区域差异,但相对较小。最后,我们还探讨了受访者是否倾向于支持一家公司,因为它是日本的。一般来说,我们在大多数情况下没有观察到这种偏差。但也发现了有趣的例外。例如,我们观察到,当对手是韩国公司或中国公司时,人们对日本公司有一定程度的偏见。当对手是美国公司时,只有法学院学生表现出支持日本公司的民族偏见。在所有样本中,非法律专业的学生都没有表现出对日本公司的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Japanese Attitudes Towards Contracts: An Empirical Wrinkle in the Debate
In this article, we re-examine, from an empirical perspective, the debate about Japanese legal consciousness. In particular, we analyze the result of a survey we conducted among Japanese law and business students to determine their attitudes towards the use of contracts as a device to order economic exchanges. We hypothesized that if the generally accepted view of Japanese attitudes towards law were correct, Japanese respondents who had not studied law and therefore possessed the "traditional Japanese attitudes" towards law would be relatively disinclined to urge strict compliance with the terms of a contract. Respondents who had studied law, on the other hand, we hypothesized, would be more inclined to see the contract enforced as written. In other words, legal education would imbue in its recipients an "American" attitude towards law, that is, a preference for strict adherence to the precise contractual terms. The data suggested just the opposite. Law students had a decided preference, over their non-law counterparts, for flexibility in the interpretation and execution of contracts. The more law students studied, the stronger that preference. This preference seems to decline, however, when law students are placed in an advisory, as opposed to advocacy role. We also observed significant gender based differences, with women preferring flexibility to a significant degree over men. Some regional differences were also observed, but were comparatively minor. Finally, we also explored whether respondents were inclined to favor a company because it was Japanese. Generally speaking, we did not observe such bias in most cases. But interesting exceptions were found. For example, we observed some degree of bias against Japanese companies in cases in which the opposing company was Korean or Chinese. And when the opposing company was American, only law students exhibited any national bias in favor of the Japanese company. Non-law students did not show any bias in favor of companies from Japan in any of the samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信