直觉反应还是理性解决问题?教师在应对课堂中断时的考虑

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ronen Kasperski, Eliezer Yariv
{"title":"直觉反应还是理性解决问题?教师在应对课堂中断时的考虑","authors":"Ronen Kasperski, Eliezer Yariv","doi":"10.1080/13632752.2022.2125210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Classroom management and coping with disruptions are a primary source of stress for teachers. However, very little is known about teachers’ considerations when facing daily disruptions in their classes. To bridge this gap, seventy-one K-12 teachers were asked to recall such an incident and describe five alternate responses they considered. Did they respond emotionally or were they able to stay calm and adopt a problem-focused approach? Did they focus on the individual, the group, or both? Did they consider immediate or medium-to-long-term actions? Despite their stress, most teachers were able to adopt a problem-focused approach and refrain from expressing their anger towards disruptive students. They mostly directed their actions towards the interfering student and preferred short-term measures. An algorithm is proposed to illustrate their decision-making process and discuss its benefits for adhering to practical and social considerations.","PeriodicalId":46308,"journal":{"name":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","volume":"53 1","pages":"152 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut reaction or rational problem-solving? Teachers’ considerations when coping with classroom disruptions\",\"authors\":\"Ronen Kasperski, Eliezer Yariv\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632752.2022.2125210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Classroom management and coping with disruptions are a primary source of stress for teachers. However, very little is known about teachers’ considerations when facing daily disruptions in their classes. To bridge this gap, seventy-one K-12 teachers were asked to recall such an incident and describe five alternate responses they considered. Did they respond emotionally or were they able to stay calm and adopt a problem-focused approach? Did they focus on the individual, the group, or both? Did they consider immediate or medium-to-long-term actions? Despite their stress, most teachers were able to adopt a problem-focused approach and refrain from expressing their anger towards disruptive students. They mostly directed their actions towards the interfering student and preferred short-term measures. An algorithm is proposed to illustrate their decision-making process and discuss its benefits for adhering to practical and social considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"152 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2022.2125210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2022.2125210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

课堂管理和应对干扰是教师压力的主要来源。然而,很少有人知道教师在面对日常课堂干扰时的考虑。为了弥补这一差距,71名K-12教师被要求回忆起这样的事件,并描述他们认为的五种不同的反应。他们是情绪化地回应,还是能够保持冷静并采取以问题为中心的方法?他们关注的是个人,群体,还是两者都关注?他们是否考虑过近期或中长期的行动?尽管压力很大,但大多数老师都能够采取以问题为中心的方法,避免对捣乱的学生表达愤怒。他们的行动主要针对干扰学生,并倾向于短期措施。提出了一种算法来说明他们的决策过程,并讨论了坚持实际和社会考虑的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gut reaction or rational problem-solving? Teachers’ considerations when coping with classroom disruptions
ABSTRACT Classroom management and coping with disruptions are a primary source of stress for teachers. However, very little is known about teachers’ considerations when facing daily disruptions in their classes. To bridge this gap, seventy-one K-12 teachers were asked to recall such an incident and describe five alternate responses they considered. Did they respond emotionally or were they able to stay calm and adopt a problem-focused approach? Did they focus on the individual, the group, or both? Did they consider immediate or medium-to-long-term actions? Despite their stress, most teachers were able to adopt a problem-focused approach and refrain from expressing their anger towards disruptive students. They mostly directed their actions towards the interfering student and preferred short-term measures. An algorithm is proposed to illustrate their decision-making process and discuss its benefits for adhering to practical and social considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The central intention of Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties (EBDs) is to contribute to readers" understanding of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, and also their knowledge of appropriate ways of preventing and responding to EBDs, in terms of intervention and policy. The journal aims to cater for a wide audience, in response to the diverse nature of the professionals who work with and for children with EBDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信