互补性与协调性:对多产品企业治理模式与绩效的启示

J. Lee, R. Kapoor
{"title":"互补性与协调性:对多产品企业治理模式与绩效的启示","authors":"J. Lee, R. Kapoor","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the fit between a firm’s product portfolio strategy and its governance mode with respect to complementary activities that underlie its product offering. We view firm’s governance choice through the lens of orchestrating complementary activities that entail multiple interrelated and often simultaneously occurring transactions. Our key premise is that a broader product portfolio, while offering benefits through the bundle of complementary activities, raises the coordination costs for firms, making integration of complementary activities a preferred mode of governance. We find strong support for our arguments in the context of the U.S. healthcare industry. Hospitals with a narrow service portfolio are more likely to have contracts with physicians as external service providers, and hospitals with a broad service portfolio are more likely to employ their own physicians. Moreover, hospitals that deviate from this fit-based relationship suffer a significant penalty in terms of their financial performa...","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"7 1","pages":"931-946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementarities and Coordination: Implications for Governance Mode and Performance of Multiproduct Firms\",\"authors\":\"J. Lee, R. Kapoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/orsc.2017.1150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We explore the fit between a firm’s product portfolio strategy and its governance mode with respect to complementary activities that underlie its product offering. We view firm’s governance choice through the lens of orchestrating complementary activities that entail multiple interrelated and often simultaneously occurring transactions. Our key premise is that a broader product portfolio, while offering benefits through the bundle of complementary activities, raises the coordination costs for firms, making integration of complementary activities a preferred mode of governance. We find strong support for our arguments in the context of the U.S. healthcare industry. Hospitals with a narrow service portfolio are more likely to have contracts with physicians as external service providers, and hospitals with a broad service portfolio are more likely to employ their own physicians. Moreover, hospitals that deviate from this fit-based relationship suffer a significant penalty in terms of their financial performa...\",\"PeriodicalId\":93599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"931-946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们探讨了公司的产品组合战略与其治理模式之间的契合度,以及构成其产品供应基础的互补活动。我们通过协调涉及多个相互关联且经常同时发生的交易的互补活动的视角来看待公司的治理选择。我们的关键前提是,更广泛的产品组合在通过一系列互补活动提供利益的同时,提高了企业的协调成本,使互补活动的整合成为首选的治理模式。我们在美国医疗保健行业的背景下为我们的论点找到了强有力的支持。服务组合较窄的医院更有可能与作为外部服务提供者的医生签订合同,而服务组合较广的医院更有可能雇用自己的医生。此外,偏离这种以健康为基础的关系的医院在财务业绩方面受到重大惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complementarities and Coordination: Implications for Governance Mode and Performance of Multiproduct Firms
We explore the fit between a firm’s product portfolio strategy and its governance mode with respect to complementary activities that underlie its product offering. We view firm’s governance choice through the lens of orchestrating complementary activities that entail multiple interrelated and often simultaneously occurring transactions. Our key premise is that a broader product portfolio, while offering benefits through the bundle of complementary activities, raises the coordination costs for firms, making integration of complementary activities a preferred mode of governance. We find strong support for our arguments in the context of the U.S. healthcare industry. Hospitals with a narrow service portfolio are more likely to have contracts with physicians as external service providers, and hospitals with a broad service portfolio are more likely to employ their own physicians. Moreover, hospitals that deviate from this fit-based relationship suffer a significant penalty in terms of their financial performa...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信