民间社会工作场所的组织公民行为

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS
Steven Langdon, Richard B. Fletcher, Stuart C. Carr
{"title":"民间社会工作场所的组织公民行为","authors":"Steven Langdon,&nbsp;Richard B. Fletcher,&nbsp;Stuart C. Carr","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizational citizenship behavior is argued to be particularly important to civil society organizations (Akhtar, Hakeem, &amp; Naeem, 2017). However, organizational citizenship behavior needs further theoretically driven research in the civil society sector, which is the overarching aim of this study which compared two competing models of organizational citizenship behavior within the New Zealand's civil society sector: Organ (1988) and Williams and Anderson (1991) models. Participants were <i>N</i> = 442 employees from 217 civil society organizations in New Zealand. Confirmatory factor analysis tested these two competing measurement models of organizational citizenship behavior. Results suggested employees of civil society organizations tended to perform citizenship behavior in accordance with Organ (1988) structured five-factor model, independent of their organization. Results are discussed, with a focus on why employees working in New Zealand's civil society sector seem to be more likely to perform Organ (1988) model of organizational citizenship behavior, and practical implications presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nvsm.1810","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational citizenship behavior in civil society workplaces\",\"authors\":\"Steven Langdon,&nbsp;Richard B. Fletcher,&nbsp;Stuart C. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nvsm.1810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organizational citizenship behavior is argued to be particularly important to civil society organizations (Akhtar, Hakeem, &amp; Naeem, 2017). However, organizational citizenship behavior needs further theoretically driven research in the civil society sector, which is the overarching aim of this study which compared two competing models of organizational citizenship behavior within the New Zealand's civil society sector: Organ (1988) and Williams and Anderson (1991) models. Participants were <i>N</i> = 442 employees from 217 civil society organizations in New Zealand. Confirmatory factor analysis tested these two competing measurement models of organizational citizenship behavior. Results suggested employees of civil society organizations tended to perform citizenship behavior in accordance with Organ (1988) structured five-factor model, independent of their organization. Results are discussed, with a focus on why employees working in New Zealand's civil society sector seem to be more likely to perform Organ (1988) model of organizational citizenship behavior, and practical implications presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nvsm.1810\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织公民行为被认为对民间社会组织尤为重要(Akhtar, Hakeem, & Naeem, 2017)。然而,组织公民行为需要在民间社会领域开展进一步的理论研究,这也是本研究的总体目标,即比较新西兰民间社会领域两种相互竞争的组织公民行为模型:Organ (1988) 模型和 Williams 与 Anderson (1991) 模型。参与者为来自新西兰 217 个民间社会组织的 442 名员工。确认性因素分析检验了这两种相互竞争的组织公民行为测量模型。结果表明,公民社会组织的员工倾向于按照 Organ(1988 年)的五因素结构模型来实施公民行为,而与他们所在的组织无关。本文对结果进行了讨论,重点是为什么在新西兰民间社会部门工作的员工似乎更倾向于采用 Organ(1988 年)的组织公民行为模型,并提出了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Organizational citizenship behavior in civil society workplaces

Organizational citizenship behavior in civil society workplaces

Organizational citizenship behavior is argued to be particularly important to civil society organizations (Akhtar, Hakeem, & Naeem, 2017). However, organizational citizenship behavior needs further theoretically driven research in the civil society sector, which is the overarching aim of this study which compared two competing models of organizational citizenship behavior within the New Zealand's civil society sector: Organ (1988) and Williams and Anderson (1991) models. Participants were N = 442 employees from 217 civil society organizations in New Zealand. Confirmatory factor analysis tested these two competing measurement models of organizational citizenship behavior. Results suggested employees of civil society organizations tended to perform citizenship behavior in accordance with Organ (1988) structured five-factor model, independent of their organization. Results are discussed, with a focus on why employees working in New Zealand's civil society sector seem to be more likely to perform Organ (1988) model of organizational citizenship behavior, and practical implications presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信