青少年心智化能力:父母教养方式的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Žana Živković-Rančić, J. Todorovic
{"title":"青少年心智化能力:父母教养方式的影响","authors":"Žana Živković-Rančić, J. Todorovic","doi":"10.2298/zipi2301093z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An authoritative parenting style and a high capacity for mentalization in adolescents have been recognized in the literature as a strong protective factor in preserving the mental health of adolescents. The aim of this research was to examine the predictive contribution of parenting styles to adolescents? capacity for mentalization. Two hundred high school students participated in the research (54.5% boys; the average age of the respondents was 17 years). The results of multiple regression analysis indicate that, when it comes to the parenting style of the mother, the dimensions of an authoritative style (regulation and connection) contribute significantly positively to an adolescent?s capacity for mentalization, while the dimensions of an authoritarian style (verbal hostility and non-reasoning) contribute significantly negatively to the development of this reflective function. When the father?s parenting style is taken into account, the dimension of an authoritative parenting style that significantly contributes to the development of mentalization is regulation, while the non-reasoning and physical coercion dimensions of an authoritarian style show a negative contribution. The main conclusion of the research is that the dimensions of an authoritative parenting style (connection and regulation) significantly contribute to the development of mentalization capacities in adolescents, while the dimensions of the authoritarian parenting style (verbal hostility of the mother, non-reasoning of both parents andphysical coercion of the father) negatively contribute to the development of mentalization. The basic pedagogical implications of the paper lead towards encouraging positive parenting styles, which would improve the overall development of children, as well as the development of their capacity for mentalization.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity for mentalization in adolescents: The contribution of parenting styles\",\"authors\":\"Žana Živković-Rančić, J. Todorovic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zipi2301093z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An authoritative parenting style and a high capacity for mentalization in adolescents have been recognized in the literature as a strong protective factor in preserving the mental health of adolescents. The aim of this research was to examine the predictive contribution of parenting styles to adolescents? capacity for mentalization. Two hundred high school students participated in the research (54.5% boys; the average age of the respondents was 17 years). The results of multiple regression analysis indicate that, when it comes to the parenting style of the mother, the dimensions of an authoritative style (regulation and connection) contribute significantly positively to an adolescent?s capacity for mentalization, while the dimensions of an authoritarian style (verbal hostility and non-reasoning) contribute significantly negatively to the development of this reflective function. When the father?s parenting style is taken into account, the dimension of an authoritative parenting style that significantly contributes to the development of mentalization is regulation, while the non-reasoning and physical coercion dimensions of an authoritarian style show a negative contribution. The main conclusion of the research is that the dimensions of an authoritative parenting style (connection and regulation) significantly contribute to the development of mentalization capacities in adolescents, while the dimensions of the authoritarian parenting style (verbal hostility of the mother, non-reasoning of both parents andphysical coercion of the father) negatively contribute to the development of mentalization. The basic pedagogical implications of the paper lead towards encouraging positive parenting styles, which would improve the overall development of children, as well as the development of their capacity for mentalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi2301093z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi2301093z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

权威的父母教养方式和青少年的高心理化能力在文献中被认为是保持青少年心理健康的强大保护因素。本研究的目的是检验父母教养方式对青少年的预测作用。心智化的能力。200名高中生参与了这项研究(54.5%的男生;受访者的平均年龄为17岁)。多元回归分析结果表明,当涉及到母亲的教养方式时,权威风格的维度(规范和联系)对青少年的影响显著正向。而专制风格的维度(言语敌意和不推理)对这种反思功能的发展有显著的负面影响。当父亲?考虑到S的教养方式,权威型教养方式对心智化的发展有显著贡献的维度是规范,而权威型教养方式的非推理和身体强制维度则表现出负向贡献。本研究的主要结论是,权威型教养方式的维度(联系和规范)对青少年心理化能力的发展有显著的促进作用,而权威型教养方式的维度(母亲的言语敌意、父母双方的不理性和父亲的身体强迫)对青少年心理化能力的发展有负向的促进作用。这篇论文的基本教育意义是鼓励积极的父母教养方式,这将改善儿童的整体发展,以及他们的心智化能力的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capacity for mentalization in adolescents: The contribution of parenting styles
An authoritative parenting style and a high capacity for mentalization in adolescents have been recognized in the literature as a strong protective factor in preserving the mental health of adolescents. The aim of this research was to examine the predictive contribution of parenting styles to adolescents? capacity for mentalization. Two hundred high school students participated in the research (54.5% boys; the average age of the respondents was 17 years). The results of multiple regression analysis indicate that, when it comes to the parenting style of the mother, the dimensions of an authoritative style (regulation and connection) contribute significantly positively to an adolescent?s capacity for mentalization, while the dimensions of an authoritarian style (verbal hostility and non-reasoning) contribute significantly negatively to the development of this reflective function. When the father?s parenting style is taken into account, the dimension of an authoritative parenting style that significantly contributes to the development of mentalization is regulation, while the non-reasoning and physical coercion dimensions of an authoritarian style show a negative contribution. The main conclusion of the research is that the dimensions of an authoritative parenting style (connection and regulation) significantly contribute to the development of mentalization capacities in adolescents, while the dimensions of the authoritarian parenting style (verbal hostility of the mother, non-reasoning of both parents andphysical coercion of the father) negatively contribute to the development of mentalization. The basic pedagogical implications of the paper lead towards encouraging positive parenting styles, which would improve the overall development of children, as well as the development of their capacity for mentalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信