大流行早期一线疾病控制人员个人防护装备使用不当的防护行为及相关因素

R. Techasuwanna, P. Thammawijaya, Bhurinud Salakij, S. Iamsirithaworn, H. Praekunatham, H. Lerdsamran, J. Prasertsopon, Thanit Rattanathumsakul, P. Puthavathana
{"title":"大流行早期一线疾病控制人员个人防护装备使用不当的防护行为及相关因素","authors":"R. Techasuwanna, P. Thammawijaya, Bhurinud Salakij, S. Iamsirithaworn, H. Praekunatham, H. Lerdsamran, J. Prasertsopon, Thanit Rattanathumsakul, P. Puthavathana","doi":"10.33582/aepidemiolpublichealth.2022.1092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Disease control personnel have an important role in preventing spreading of COVID-19, such as case screening, outbreak investigation, and contact tracing. This study aims to find out their protective behaviors and other associated factors with inappropriate PPE use, as well as the percentage of seropositivity by natural SARS-CoV2 infection in September 2020 during the period without any COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 172 Thai Department of Disease Control personnel, which all had done questionnaires regarding demographic data and protective behavior. The blood test was performed to find out Neutralizing antibody titer (Nab) and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression was conducted for identifying factors associated with inappropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use. Results: Of all 172 participants, 38 (22.1%) were Health Care Workers (HCW), 79 (45.9%) were Public Health Personnel (PHP), and 55 (32%) were Non-Health Workers (NHW). Most were female (130; 75.6%). Hand hygiene was the behavior with the highest proportion of being done every time among all participants during work (90.5%), while cleaning high-touch surface and using cashless system were done only a few or sometimes by most participants (55.9% and 56.1%, respectively). Middle age, less experience, and working as Public Health Officers, were associated with appropriate PPE use during work. Participants who had trained for PPE use at least once in the recent year practice inappropriate PPE use less than those who had not been trained, even though there were no significant differences.","PeriodicalId":92475,"journal":{"name":"Annals of epidemiology and public health","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective Behavior and Factor Associated with Inappropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use among Frontline Disease Control Personnel during the Early Phase of Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"R. Techasuwanna, P. Thammawijaya, Bhurinud Salakij, S. Iamsirithaworn, H. Praekunatham, H. Lerdsamran, J. Prasertsopon, Thanit Rattanathumsakul, P. Puthavathana\",\"doi\":\"10.33582/aepidemiolpublichealth.2022.1092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Disease control personnel have an important role in preventing spreading of COVID-19, such as case screening, outbreak investigation, and contact tracing. This study aims to find out their protective behaviors and other associated factors with inappropriate PPE use, as well as the percentage of seropositivity by natural SARS-CoV2 infection in September 2020 during the period without any COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 172 Thai Department of Disease Control personnel, which all had done questionnaires regarding demographic data and protective behavior. The blood test was performed to find out Neutralizing antibody titer (Nab) and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression was conducted for identifying factors associated with inappropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use. Results: Of all 172 participants, 38 (22.1%) were Health Care Workers (HCW), 79 (45.9%) were Public Health Personnel (PHP), and 55 (32%) were Non-Health Workers (NHW). Most were female (130; 75.6%). Hand hygiene was the behavior with the highest proportion of being done every time among all participants during work (90.5%), while cleaning high-touch surface and using cashless system were done only a few or sometimes by most participants (55.9% and 56.1%, respectively). Middle age, less experience, and working as Public Health Officers, were associated with appropriate PPE use during work. Participants who had trained for PPE use at least once in the recent year practice inappropriate PPE use less than those who had not been trained, even though there were no significant differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of epidemiology and public health\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of epidemiology and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33582/aepidemiolpublichealth.2022.1092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of epidemiology and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33582/aepidemiolpublichealth.2022.1092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疾病控制人员在病例筛查、疫情调查、接触者追踪等防控工作中发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在了解其防护行为及与PPE使用不当相关的因素,以及2020年9月未接种COVID-19疫苗期间自然感染SARS-CoV2的血清学阳性百分比。方法:对172名泰国疾病控制部门工作人员进行横断面研究,所有人员都完成了人口统计数据和保护行为的问卷调查。血液检测检测中和抗体滴度(Nab)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)。采用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归对数据进行分析,以确定与个人防护装备(PPE)使用不当相关的因素。结果:172名参与者中,卫生保健工作者(HCW) 38人(22.1%),公共卫生人员(PHP) 79人(45.9%),非卫生工作者(NHW) 55人(32%)。多数为女性(130例;75.6%)。所有参与者在工作期间每次都做手卫生的比例最高(90.5%),而清洁高接触表面和使用无现金系统的比例只有少数或有时(分别为55.9%和56.1%)。中年、经验不足和担任公共卫生官员与工作期间适当使用个人防护装备有关。在最近一年中至少接受过一次个人防护装备使用培训的参与者比没有接受过培训的参与者更少使用不适当的个人防护装备,尽管没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protective Behavior and Factor Associated with Inappropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use among Frontline Disease Control Personnel during the Early Phase of Pandemic
Background: Disease control personnel have an important role in preventing spreading of COVID-19, such as case screening, outbreak investigation, and contact tracing. This study aims to find out their protective behaviors and other associated factors with inappropriate PPE use, as well as the percentage of seropositivity by natural SARS-CoV2 infection in September 2020 during the period without any COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 172 Thai Department of Disease Control personnel, which all had done questionnaires regarding demographic data and protective behavior. The blood test was performed to find out Neutralizing antibody titer (Nab) and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression was conducted for identifying factors associated with inappropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use. Results: Of all 172 participants, 38 (22.1%) were Health Care Workers (HCW), 79 (45.9%) were Public Health Personnel (PHP), and 55 (32%) were Non-Health Workers (NHW). Most were female (130; 75.6%). Hand hygiene was the behavior with the highest proportion of being done every time among all participants during work (90.5%), while cleaning high-touch surface and using cashless system were done only a few or sometimes by most participants (55.9% and 56.1%, respectively). Middle age, less experience, and working as Public Health Officers, were associated with appropriate PPE use during work. Participants who had trained for PPE use at least once in the recent year practice inappropriate PPE use less than those who had not been trained, even though there were no significant differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信