利用网络分析法研究跨诊断饮食失调样本中的临床完美主义理论

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Christina Ralph-Nearman, Brenna M. Williams, Anna Marie L. Ortiz, Cheri A. Levinson
{"title":"利用网络分析法研究跨诊断饮食失调样本中的临床完美主义理论","authors":"Christina Ralph-Nearman,&nbsp;Brenna M. Williams,&nbsp;Anna Marie L. Ortiz,&nbsp;Cheri A. Levinson","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Eating disorders are deadly psychiatric illnesses, with treatments working for less than half of individuals who seek treatment. The transdiagnostic theory of eating disorders proposes that eating disorders share similar maintaining symptoms, such as what this theory calls <em>clinical perfectionism</em> (i.e., high levels of <em>concern over mistakes</em> and <em>personal standards</em>). However, it has been difficult to examine the interrelationship of specific aspects of perfectionism, beyond assessing moderation effects, which have generally not found support for the theory of clinical perfectionism in eating disorders. Thus, we used network analysis to test the theory of perfectionism by testing the interrelationships between maladaptive perfectionism facets (<em>concern over mistakes</em>, <em>personal standards, parental criticism</em>, <em>parental expectations</em>, and <em>personal standards</em>) and eating disorder symptoms in 397 individuals diagnosed with an eating disorder. <em>Concern over mistakes</em> was a central symptom and demonstrated the strongest interrelationships with eating disorder symptoms compared to the other aspects of perfectionism, connecting to eating concerns and cognitive restraint. Objective binge eating had a strong negative connection to <em>personal standards</em>. We identified specific central symptoms and illness pathways of perfectionism, which partially supports the theory of clinical perfectionism. Results, if replicated, may suggest that <em>concern over mistakes</em> might be best reconceptualized as part of eating disorder pathology and be targeted to improve treatment outcomes for eating disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Theory of Clinical Perfectionism in a Transdiagnostic Eating Disorder Sample Using Network Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christina Ralph-Nearman,&nbsp;Brenna M. Williams,&nbsp;Anna Marie L. Ortiz,&nbsp;Cheri A. Levinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beth.2023.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Eating disorders are deadly psychiatric illnesses, with treatments working for less than half of individuals who seek treatment. The transdiagnostic theory of eating disorders proposes that eating disorders share similar maintaining symptoms, such as what this theory calls <em>clinical perfectionism</em> (i.e., high levels of <em>concern over mistakes</em> and <em>personal standards</em>). However, it has been difficult to examine the interrelationship of specific aspects of perfectionism, beyond assessing moderation effects, which have generally not found support for the theory of clinical perfectionism in eating disorders. Thus, we used network analysis to test the theory of perfectionism by testing the interrelationships between maladaptive perfectionism facets (<em>concern over mistakes</em>, <em>personal standards, parental criticism</em>, <em>parental expectations</em>, and <em>personal standards</em>) and eating disorder symptoms in 397 individuals diagnosed with an eating disorder. <em>Concern over mistakes</em> was a central symptom and demonstrated the strongest interrelationships with eating disorder symptoms compared to the other aspects of perfectionism, connecting to eating concerns and cognitive restraint. Objective binge eating had a strong negative connection to <em>personal standards</em>. We identified specific central symptoms and illness pathways of perfectionism, which partially supports the theory of clinical perfectionism. Results, if replicated, may suggest that <em>concern over mistakes</em> might be best reconceptualized as part of eating disorder pathology and be targeted to improve treatment outcomes for eating disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 14-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789423000400\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789423000400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饮食失调症是一种致命的精神疾病,在寻求治疗的患者中,只有不到一半的人接受了治疗。饮食失调的跨诊断理论认为,饮食失调具有类似的维持症状,例如该理论所说的临床完美主义(即对错误和个人标准的高度关注)。然而,除了评估调节效应外,我们很难研究完美主义的具体方面之间的相互关系。因此,我们利用网络分析法来检验完美主义理论,对 397 名被诊断为饮食失调症患者的不良完美主义方面(关注错误、个人标准、父母批评、父母期望和个人标准)与饮食失调症状之间的相互关系进行了检验。与完美主义的其他方面相比,对错误的担忧是一个核心症状,与饮食失调症状的相互关系最密切,与饮食担忧和认知限制有关。客观的暴饮暴食与个人标准有很强的负相关。我们确定了完美主义的特定中心症状和疾病路径,这部分支持了临床完美主义理论。研究结果如能得到证实,可能会表明对错误的担忧最好被重新概念化为进食障碍病理学的一部分,并有针对性地改善进食障碍的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Theory of Clinical Perfectionism in a Transdiagnostic Eating Disorder Sample Using Network Analysis

Eating disorders are deadly psychiatric illnesses, with treatments working for less than half of individuals who seek treatment. The transdiagnostic theory of eating disorders proposes that eating disorders share similar maintaining symptoms, such as what this theory calls clinical perfectionism (i.e., high levels of concern over mistakes and personal standards). However, it has been difficult to examine the interrelationship of specific aspects of perfectionism, beyond assessing moderation effects, which have generally not found support for the theory of clinical perfectionism in eating disorders. Thus, we used network analysis to test the theory of perfectionism by testing the interrelationships between maladaptive perfectionism facets (concern over mistakes, personal standards, parental criticism, parental expectations, and personal standards) and eating disorder symptoms in 397 individuals diagnosed with an eating disorder. Concern over mistakes was a central symptom and demonstrated the strongest interrelationships with eating disorder symptoms compared to the other aspects of perfectionism, connecting to eating concerns and cognitive restraint. Objective binge eating had a strong negative connection to personal standards. We identified specific central symptoms and illness pathways of perfectionism, which partially supports the theory of clinical perfectionism. Results, if replicated, may suggest that concern over mistakes might be best reconceptualized as part of eating disorder pathology and be targeted to improve treatment outcomes for eating disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信