教学生关于工作的世界

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
T. Larsen
{"title":"教学生关于工作的世界","authors":"T. Larsen","doi":"10.1080/00221341.2021.2000630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching Students about the World of Work is an attempt to consider how jobs, good jobs, can hold a central place in higher education curricula. Faculty members are often tasked with not only recruiting majors but also ensuring that students graduate and gain meaningful employment. Following through with the bold guarantees made by higher education administrators is a tall order. Editors Nancy Hoffman and Michael Lawrence Collins compile chapters from teachers, education researchers, and advocates who realize that a successful college education involves more than filling lecture halls and typing letters of recommendation. Hoffman and Collins organize chapters starting with practical strategies and ending with broader theoretical observations. Chapters 1 through 3 work best in the dean’s office or in an elevator conversation with a department chair. Chapter authors argue the case for a work-centered curriculum in higher education—good fodder to make pitches to college and university administrators. Chapters 4 and 5 detail the nature of jobs and careers, which can be helpful for faculty who advise students and coordinate professional development seminars. The final three chapters provide conceptual knowledge about education reform and social justice. Their authors attach critical theory to the appraisal of higher education curricula. Described in these writings are obstacles of job mobility for low-income students of color and indigenous descent, as well as proposals to support systemic change in higher education curricula. Reading this book, I found geography’s social scientific side to be consistently affirmed as a marketable perspective and skillset. Geographers in higher education may be inspired by the book’s overview of “ethnographies of work” (EOW), a two-part instructional model that challenges students to “use ethnographic methods to investigate a career they are interested in (EOW I)” and “to address a workplace problem/research question using ethnography (EOW II)” (61). In a capstone course, the EOW framework could provide a chance for upper-level geography students to apply methods and modes of analysis from human geography to navigate their careers. Another contribution is the identification of metrics for students and faculty to evaluate jobs and careers. When discussing the geography of careers, the term “labor shed” (like a watershed or windshed) is used to examine the availability of different types of jobs in an area (76). Readers are introduced to a typology of labor—lifetime jobs, springboard jobs, and static jobs—as well as tactics to measure a good job, like analyzing company data, consulting external sources (e.g., Glassdoor and Indeed), gauging customer/client satisfaction, and interviewing people in that job network. Some jobs will be less than ideal, so suggestions are given for how to make any job a better job, like building skillsets, soliciting feedback, requesting additional responsibilities, locating a mentor, and maintaining contact with one’s wider network. Drawing from personal experience, I have concerns that these aspects might get taken for granted the further faculty members are removed from the job search. This book is geared toward community college faculty and administrators—those who work closely with low-income students in preparation for a job or to transfer to a university. Regardless of the target audience, I am convinced that every geographer in higher education could find this subject matter useful. Lone geographers in small colleges and universities might use ideas from this book as a steppingstone to align the discipline more closely with job-focused curriculum reform. No future of geography education can be charted without bringing jobs into the equation. Teaching Students about the World of Work serves as an important reminder as geography educators reinvent the discipline.","PeriodicalId":51539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geography","volume":"13 1","pages":"176 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Students about the World of Work\",\"authors\":\"T. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00221341.2021.2000630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teaching Students about the World of Work is an attempt to consider how jobs, good jobs, can hold a central place in higher education curricula. Faculty members are often tasked with not only recruiting majors but also ensuring that students graduate and gain meaningful employment. Following through with the bold guarantees made by higher education administrators is a tall order. Editors Nancy Hoffman and Michael Lawrence Collins compile chapters from teachers, education researchers, and advocates who realize that a successful college education involves more than filling lecture halls and typing letters of recommendation. Hoffman and Collins organize chapters starting with practical strategies and ending with broader theoretical observations. Chapters 1 through 3 work best in the dean’s office or in an elevator conversation with a department chair. Chapter authors argue the case for a work-centered curriculum in higher education—good fodder to make pitches to college and university administrators. Chapters 4 and 5 detail the nature of jobs and careers, which can be helpful for faculty who advise students and coordinate professional development seminars. The final three chapters provide conceptual knowledge about education reform and social justice. Their authors attach critical theory to the appraisal of higher education curricula. Described in these writings are obstacles of job mobility for low-income students of color and indigenous descent, as well as proposals to support systemic change in higher education curricula. Reading this book, I found geography’s social scientific side to be consistently affirmed as a marketable perspective and skillset. Geographers in higher education may be inspired by the book’s overview of “ethnographies of work” (EOW), a two-part instructional model that challenges students to “use ethnographic methods to investigate a career they are interested in (EOW I)” and “to address a workplace problem/research question using ethnography (EOW II)” (61). In a capstone course, the EOW framework could provide a chance for upper-level geography students to apply methods and modes of analysis from human geography to navigate their careers. Another contribution is the identification of metrics for students and faculty to evaluate jobs and careers. When discussing the geography of careers, the term “labor shed” (like a watershed or windshed) is used to examine the availability of different types of jobs in an area (76). Readers are introduced to a typology of labor—lifetime jobs, springboard jobs, and static jobs—as well as tactics to measure a good job, like analyzing company data, consulting external sources (e.g., Glassdoor and Indeed), gauging customer/client satisfaction, and interviewing people in that job network. Some jobs will be less than ideal, so suggestions are given for how to make any job a better job, like building skillsets, soliciting feedback, requesting additional responsibilities, locating a mentor, and maintaining contact with one’s wider network. Drawing from personal experience, I have concerns that these aspects might get taken for granted the further faculty members are removed from the job search. This book is geared toward community college faculty and administrators—those who work closely with low-income students in preparation for a job or to transfer to a university. Regardless of the target audience, I am convinced that every geographer in higher education could find this subject matter useful. Lone geographers in small colleges and universities might use ideas from this book as a steppingstone to align the discipline more closely with job-focused curriculum reform. No future of geography education can be charted without bringing jobs into the equation. Teaching Students about the World of Work serves as an important reminder as geography educators reinvent the discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geography\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"176 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.2000630\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.2000630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教学生关于工作的世界是一种尝试,考虑工作,好工作,如何在高等教育课程中占据中心位置。教师的任务往往不仅是招聘专业,还要确保学生毕业并获得有意义的就业。遵循高等教育管理者做出的大胆保证是一项艰巨的任务。编辑南希·霍夫曼和迈克尔·劳伦斯·柯林斯从教师、教育研究人员和倡导者那里汇编了章节,他们意识到成功的大学教育不仅仅是在演讲厅里填满演讲和打推荐信。霍夫曼和柯林斯组织的章节从实际策略开始,以更广泛的理论观察结束。第1章到第3章在院长办公室或在电梯里与系主任的谈话中效果最好。本章的作者为高等教育中以工作为中心的课程提出了理由——这是向学院和大学管理者推销的好素材。第四章和第五章详细介绍了工作和职业的性质,这对指导学生和协调专业发展研讨会的教师很有帮助。最后三章提供教育改革与社会公正的概念知识。他们的作者将批判理论与高等教育课程的评价联系起来。这些文章描述了有色人种和土著血统的低收入学生就业流动的障碍,以及支持高等教育课程系统性改革的建议。读了这本书,我发现地理学的社会科学方面一直被肯定为一种市场视角和技能。高等教育中的地理学家可能会受到书中“工作民族志”(EOW)概述的启发,这是一个由两部分组成的教学模式,挑战学生“使用民族志方法调查他们感兴趣的职业(EOW I)”和“使用民族志解决工作场所问题/研究问题(EOW II)”(61)。在顶点课程中,EOW框架可以为高级地理学生提供一个应用人文地理分析方法和模式的机会,以指导他们的职业生涯。另一个贡献是确定了学生和教师评估工作和职业的指标。在讨论职业的地理分布时,术语“劳动棚”(如分水岭或风棚)被用来检查一个地区不同类型工作的可用性(76)。本书向读者介绍了劳动终身工作、跳板工作和静态工作的分类,以及衡量一份好工作的策略,比如分析公司数据、咨询外部资源(例如Glassdoor和Indeed)、衡量客户/客户满意度,以及采访该工作网络中的人。有些工作可能不太理想,因此本文给出了如何让任何工作变得更好的建议,比如培养技能、征求反馈、要求承担额外的责任、寻找导师以及与更广泛的人际网络保持联系。根据个人经验,我担心这些方面可能会被认为是理所当然的,因为更多的教职员工会被排除在求职之外。这本书是面向社区大学的教师和管理人员,他们与低收入学生密切合作,准备工作或转到大学。不管目标读者是谁,我相信每个接受高等教育的地理学家都会发现这个主题很有用。小型学院和大学的孤独地理学家可能会使用本书中的观点作为跳板,使这门学科与以就业为重点的课程改革更紧密地结合起来。地理教育的未来不可能不把就业纳入其中。在地理教育者重塑这门学科的过程中,教授学生关于工作世界的知识是一个重要的提醒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching Students about the World of Work
Teaching Students about the World of Work is an attempt to consider how jobs, good jobs, can hold a central place in higher education curricula. Faculty members are often tasked with not only recruiting majors but also ensuring that students graduate and gain meaningful employment. Following through with the bold guarantees made by higher education administrators is a tall order. Editors Nancy Hoffman and Michael Lawrence Collins compile chapters from teachers, education researchers, and advocates who realize that a successful college education involves more than filling lecture halls and typing letters of recommendation. Hoffman and Collins organize chapters starting with practical strategies and ending with broader theoretical observations. Chapters 1 through 3 work best in the dean’s office or in an elevator conversation with a department chair. Chapter authors argue the case for a work-centered curriculum in higher education—good fodder to make pitches to college and university administrators. Chapters 4 and 5 detail the nature of jobs and careers, which can be helpful for faculty who advise students and coordinate professional development seminars. The final three chapters provide conceptual knowledge about education reform and social justice. Their authors attach critical theory to the appraisal of higher education curricula. Described in these writings are obstacles of job mobility for low-income students of color and indigenous descent, as well as proposals to support systemic change in higher education curricula. Reading this book, I found geography’s social scientific side to be consistently affirmed as a marketable perspective and skillset. Geographers in higher education may be inspired by the book’s overview of “ethnographies of work” (EOW), a two-part instructional model that challenges students to “use ethnographic methods to investigate a career they are interested in (EOW I)” and “to address a workplace problem/research question using ethnography (EOW II)” (61). In a capstone course, the EOW framework could provide a chance for upper-level geography students to apply methods and modes of analysis from human geography to navigate their careers. Another contribution is the identification of metrics for students and faculty to evaluate jobs and careers. When discussing the geography of careers, the term “labor shed” (like a watershed or windshed) is used to examine the availability of different types of jobs in an area (76). Readers are introduced to a typology of labor—lifetime jobs, springboard jobs, and static jobs—as well as tactics to measure a good job, like analyzing company data, consulting external sources (e.g., Glassdoor and Indeed), gauging customer/client satisfaction, and interviewing people in that job network. Some jobs will be less than ideal, so suggestions are given for how to make any job a better job, like building skillsets, soliciting feedback, requesting additional responsibilities, locating a mentor, and maintaining contact with one’s wider network. Drawing from personal experience, I have concerns that these aspects might get taken for granted the further faculty members are removed from the job search. This book is geared toward community college faculty and administrators—those who work closely with low-income students in preparation for a job or to transfer to a university. Regardless of the target audience, I am convinced that every geographer in higher education could find this subject matter useful. Lone geographers in small colleges and universities might use ideas from this book as a steppingstone to align the discipline more closely with job-focused curriculum reform. No future of geography education can be charted without bringing jobs into the equation. Teaching Students about the World of Work serves as an important reminder as geography educators reinvent the discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Journal of Geography is the journal of the National Council for Geographic Education. The Journal of Geography provides a forum to present innovative approaches to geography research, teaching, and learning. The Journal publishes articles on the results of research, instructional approaches, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信