{"title":"空想的潜力的庭园Narration: Ivan Gončarovs Oblomovka和杨Nerudas Kleinseite","authors":"Irina Wutsdorff","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relationship between the idyll and narration has a paradoxical nature: In its state of complete harmony, the idyll is beyond any change or development. In terms of narration, however, this poses a fundamental difficulty. This was a problem already recognized in Schiller’s reflections on the idyll in the context of the philosophy of history, expounded in his essay On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry (Über naive und sentimentale Dichtung). By depicting a golden age, i. e., a state that can only ever be appreciated in retrospect, the idyll, according to Schiller, inspires, above all, the pursuit of such a state of harmony in the present. In identification of the idyllic consciousness, representation can only take the form of endangerment by external threats, and in certain cases, the successful overcoming of these threats. Conversely, it is only possible to show the idyll as a state not yet realized, still to be pursued from a perspective outside of the idyllic consciousness. Consequently, the device of a distant, masterful narrator is instrumental to the nuanced depiction of both Prague’s Lesser Quarter (Malá Strana or Kleinseite) in Jan Neruda’s eponymous tales and the Oblomovka country estate in Ivan Gončarov’s novel Oblomov. In both instances, the narrative allows for a critique of the premature realization of pseudo-idyll. Furthermore, the idyll is put into perspective so that beyond signifying loss, its potential to inspire visions of the future is summoned.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"11 1","pages":"44 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utopische Potenziale des Idyllischen in der Narration: Ivan Gončarovs Oblomovka und Jan Nerudas Kleinseite\",\"authors\":\"Irina Wutsdorff\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/arcadia-2020-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The relationship between the idyll and narration has a paradoxical nature: In its state of complete harmony, the idyll is beyond any change or development. In terms of narration, however, this poses a fundamental difficulty. This was a problem already recognized in Schiller’s reflections on the idyll in the context of the philosophy of history, expounded in his essay On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry (Über naive und sentimentale Dichtung). By depicting a golden age, i. e., a state that can only ever be appreciated in retrospect, the idyll, according to Schiller, inspires, above all, the pursuit of such a state of harmony in the present. In identification of the idyllic consciousness, representation can only take the form of endangerment by external threats, and in certain cases, the successful overcoming of these threats. Conversely, it is only possible to show the idyll as a state not yet realized, still to be pursued from a perspective outside of the idyllic consciousness. Consequently, the device of a distant, masterful narrator is instrumental to the nuanced depiction of both Prague’s Lesser Quarter (Malá Strana or Kleinseite) in Jan Neruda’s eponymous tales and the Oblomovka country estate in Ivan Gončarov’s novel Oblomov. In both instances, the narrative allows for a critique of the premature realization of pseudo-idyll. Furthermore, the idyll is put into perspective so that beyond signifying loss, its potential to inspire visions of the future is summoned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCADIA\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCADIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2020-0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2020-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要田园诗与叙事的关系具有矛盾性:处于完全和谐状态的田园诗是无法改变和发展的。然而,在叙述方面,这构成了一个根本的困难。这个问题在席勒的《论Naïve与感伤诗》(Über naive und sentimentale Dichtung)一文中对历史哲学背景下的田园诗的反思中已经认识到了。席勒认为,田园诗通过描绘一个黄金时代,即一种只有在回顾时才能欣赏的状态,首先激发了人们对当下这种和谐状态的追求。在对田园诗意识的识别中,表现形式只能是外部威胁的危害,在某些情况下,只能是成功克服这些威胁。相反,我们只能把田园诗表现为一种尚未实现的状态,还有待从田园诗意识之外的视角去追求。因此,对于简·聂鲁达同名小说中的布拉格小区(mal Strana或Kleinseite)和伊万·贡阿罗夫的小说《奥布洛莫夫》中的奥布洛莫夫卡乡村庄园,一位遥远而娴熟的叙述者的手法都起到了微妙的作用。在这两个例子中,叙述允许对伪田园诗的过早实现的批评。此外,诗情画意被赋予了一种视角,因此,除了表示损失之外,它还能激发人们对未来的憧憬。
Utopische Potenziale des Idyllischen in der Narration: Ivan Gončarovs Oblomovka und Jan Nerudas Kleinseite
Abstract The relationship between the idyll and narration has a paradoxical nature: In its state of complete harmony, the idyll is beyond any change or development. In terms of narration, however, this poses a fundamental difficulty. This was a problem already recognized in Schiller’s reflections on the idyll in the context of the philosophy of history, expounded in his essay On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry (Über naive und sentimentale Dichtung). By depicting a golden age, i. e., a state that can only ever be appreciated in retrospect, the idyll, according to Schiller, inspires, above all, the pursuit of such a state of harmony in the present. In identification of the idyllic consciousness, representation can only take the form of endangerment by external threats, and in certain cases, the successful overcoming of these threats. Conversely, it is only possible to show the idyll as a state not yet realized, still to be pursued from a perspective outside of the idyllic consciousness. Consequently, the device of a distant, masterful narrator is instrumental to the nuanced depiction of both Prague’s Lesser Quarter (Malá Strana or Kleinseite) in Jan Neruda’s eponymous tales and the Oblomovka country estate in Ivan Gončarov’s novel Oblomov. In both instances, the narrative allows for a critique of the premature realization of pseudo-idyll. Furthermore, the idyll is put into perspective so that beyond signifying loss, its potential to inspire visions of the future is summoned.
期刊介绍:
arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.