在国家援助与基本自由之间:一臂之遥原则与欧盟法

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
S. Buriak, I. Lazarov
{"title":"在国家援助与基本自由之间:一臂之遥原则与欧盟法","authors":"S. Buriak, I. Lazarov","doi":"10.54648/cola2019076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the relationship between the rules on State aid and the fundamental freedoms when ruling on the compatibility with EU law of domestic transfer pricing provisions, based on the arm’s length principle. It shows that the Commission’s recent practice concerning State aid on advance pricing agreements is difficult to reconcile with the ECJ’s case law when ruling on the arm’s length principle under the fundamental freedoms. On the one hand, the Member States should not be too restrictive when applying their transfer pricing rules, as stemming from the proportionality requirement under the fundamental freedoms,while on the other hand they must not be too lenient either, otherwise they risk a State aid investigation. Pressed at both ends by these opposing forces, the margin for error becomes narrow or, sometimes, non-existent.","PeriodicalId":54058,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Tax Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between State Aid and the Fundamental Freedoms: The Arm’s Length Principle and EU Law\",\"authors\":\"S. Buriak, I. Lazarov\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/cola2019076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the relationship between the rules on State aid and the fundamental freedoms when ruling on the compatibility with EU law of domestic transfer pricing provisions, based on the arm’s length principle. It shows that the Commission’s recent practice concerning State aid on advance pricing agreements is difficult to reconcile with the ECJ’s case law when ruling on the arm’s length principle under the fundamental freedoms. On the one hand, the Member States should not be too restrictive when applying their transfer pricing rules, as stemming from the proportionality requirement under the fundamental freedoms,while on the other hand they must not be too lenient either, otherwise they risk a State aid investigation. Pressed at both ends by these opposing forces, the margin for error becomes narrow or, sometimes, non-existent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2019076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2019076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于公平原则,考察了国家援助规则与基本自由之间的关系,以判断国内转让定价条款是否符合欧盟法律。这表明,委员会最近关于预先定价协议的国家援助的做法,在对基本自由下的公平原则作出裁决时,很难与欧洲法院的判例法相协调。一方面,会员国在适用其转让定价规则时不应过于严格,因为这是根据基本自由的相称性要求产生的;另一方面,它们也不应过于宽松,否则就有可能受到国家援助调查。在这两种对立力量的压迫下,犯错的余地变得很小,有时甚至是不存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between State Aid and the Fundamental Freedoms: The Arm’s Length Principle and EU Law
The article examines the relationship between the rules on State aid and the fundamental freedoms when ruling on the compatibility with EU law of domestic transfer pricing provisions, based on the arm’s length principle. It shows that the Commission’s recent practice concerning State aid on advance pricing agreements is difficult to reconcile with the ECJ’s case law when ruling on the arm’s length principle under the fundamental freedoms. On the one hand, the Member States should not be too restrictive when applying their transfer pricing rules, as stemming from the proportionality requirement under the fundamental freedoms,while on the other hand they must not be too lenient either, otherwise they risk a State aid investigation. Pressed at both ends by these opposing forces, the margin for error becomes narrow or, sometimes, non-existent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信