实时RT-PCR评价样品和RNA提取池检测SARS-CoV-2 RNA的有效性

M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen
{"title":"实时RT-PCR评价样品和RNA提取池检测SARS-CoV-2 RNA的有效性","authors":"M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen","doi":"10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.","PeriodicalId":32303,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of sample and RNA extract pool testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real time RT-PCR\",\"authors\":\"M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:集中检测是在大流行期间提高检测能力的一种经济有效的方法。本研究分析了实时RT-PCR检测SARS-CoV-2的样品池和RNA提取物的有效性。方法:选取Ct值在25 ~ 35之间的20份SARS-CoV-2阳性样本和初步PCR结果已知的60份阴性样本进行研究。样品在提取前分别制备2倍、4倍和8倍混合样品。将另外10个PCR阳性样本的RNA提取液合并为2倍、4倍和8倍RNA提取液池。纯样本和合并样本的Ct值比较采用配对t检验,置信区间为95%。对纯RNA提取物和提取池进行同样的处理。结果:当池大小在样品池中从2倍增加到8倍时,检测能力明显降低,而RNA提取物池在稀释2至8倍时检测能力为100%。2倍、4倍和8倍样品稀释液的Ct值增加分别为1.69±0.78、3.84±1.47和8.98±2.25 (P < 0.0001)。然而,2倍、4倍和8倍提取池的Ct值略有上升(分别为1.01±0.38、2.18±0.82和3.05±0.77)。结论:通过2倍或4倍的样本池或4倍或8倍的RNA提取池,可以最大限度地大规模筛查无症状个体的SARS-CoV-2,而不会显著影响检测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the effectiveness of sample and RNA extract pool testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real time RT-PCR
Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信