印度应该用哪个指标来监测疟疾的消除?

Arvind Nath
{"title":"印度应该用哪个指标来监测疟疾的消除?","authors":"Arvind Nath","doi":"10.24321/2455.7048.202212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Annual Parasite Incidence (API) is currently being used by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) as an indicator to monitor malaria elimination efforts in states and union territories. This article is an attempt to find out how effective is the API as a tool to measure malaria elimination efforts in the country by reviewing documents published by the NVBDCP (for 2018 data) and National Statistical Office (for 2021 data) and by doing a web search. It was found that in the 2018 data set, there was no direct correlation between API and the number of malaria cases. Even in territories having low API, the number of malaria cases was high and in areas having high API, the number of malaria cases was low. From the 2021 data set, it was seen that the malaria problem was greatest in Chhattisgarh and least in Lakshadweep Islands. Thus, API by itself is not a useful indicator of malaria elimination efforts. Attention must also be paid to the actual number of malaria cases occurring in the state/ union territory, and at the present time, the focus must be on Chhattisgarh.","PeriodicalId":89674,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology Research International","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Indicator Should Be used to Monitor Malaria Elimination in India?\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Nath\",\"doi\":\"10.24321/2455.7048.202212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Annual Parasite Incidence (API) is currently being used by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) as an indicator to monitor malaria elimination efforts in states and union territories. This article is an attempt to find out how effective is the API as a tool to measure malaria elimination efforts in the country by reviewing documents published by the NVBDCP (for 2018 data) and National Statistical Office (for 2021 data) and by doing a web search. It was found that in the 2018 data set, there was no direct correlation between API and the number of malaria cases. Even in territories having low API, the number of malaria cases was high and in areas having high API, the number of malaria cases was low. From the 2021 data set, it was seen that the malaria problem was greatest in Chhattisgarh and least in Lakshadweep Islands. Thus, API by itself is not a useful indicator of malaria elimination efforts. Attention must also be paid to the actual number of malaria cases occurring in the state/ union territory, and at the present time, the focus must be on Chhattisgarh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology Research International\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.202212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.202212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,国家病媒传播疾病控制方案(NVBDCP)正在使用年度寄生虫发病率作为监测各邦和联邦领土消除疟疾工作的指标。本文试图通过审查国家疟疾预防控制中心(2018年数据)和国家统计局(2021年数据)发布的文件以及进行网络搜索,找出API作为衡量该国消除疟疾工作的工具的有效性。研究发现,在2018年的数据集中,API与疟疾病例数之间没有直接相关性。即使在空气污染指数低的地区,疟疾病例数也很高,而在空气污染指数高的地区,疟疾病例数也很低。从2021年的数据集可以看出,恰蒂斯加尔邦的疟疾问题最严重,拉克沙群岛的疟疾问题最轻。因此,API本身并不是消除疟疾工作的有用指标。还必须注意在邦/联邦领土上发生的疟疾病例的实际数量,目前必须把重点放在恰蒂斯加尔邦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Indicator Should Be used to Monitor Malaria Elimination in India?
The Annual Parasite Incidence (API) is currently being used by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) as an indicator to monitor malaria elimination efforts in states and union territories. This article is an attempt to find out how effective is the API as a tool to measure malaria elimination efforts in the country by reviewing documents published by the NVBDCP (for 2018 data) and National Statistical Office (for 2021 data) and by doing a web search. It was found that in the 2018 data set, there was no direct correlation between API and the number of malaria cases. Even in territories having low API, the number of malaria cases was high and in areas having high API, the number of malaria cases was low. From the 2021 data set, it was seen that the malaria problem was greatest in Chhattisgarh and least in Lakshadweep Islands. Thus, API by itself is not a useful indicator of malaria elimination efforts. Attention must also be paid to the actual number of malaria cases occurring in the state/ union territory, and at the present time, the focus must be on Chhattisgarh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信