领导力、渐进主义和历史的重复:一场四幕的乌克兰悲剧

Leadership (London) Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1177/17427150221103405

K. Grint

{"title":"领导力、渐进主义和历史的重复:一场四幕的乌克兰悲剧","authors":"K. Grint","doi":"10.1177/17427150221103405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leadership is often associated with a particular form of decision-making: being decisive. This paper reflects on the limits of decisiveness and the role of incrementalism in the Russian decision to invade Ukraine and the role of the West and NATO’s decision-making over the prior 10 years. It suggests that incrementalism is both a legitimate mode and a significant problem in such scenarios, and focuses on the historical context to explain the decision to invade and the subsequent military failures.","PeriodicalId":92094,"journal":{"name":"Leadership (London)","volume":"18 1","pages":"601 - 611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership, incrementalism and the repetition of history: A Ukrainian tragedy in four acts\",\"authors\":\"K. Grint\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17427150221103405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leadership is often associated with a particular form of decision-making: being decisive. This paper reflects on the limits of decisiveness and the role of incrementalism in the Russian decision to invade Ukraine and the role of the West and NATO’s decision-making over the prior 10 years. It suggests that incrementalism is both a legitimate mode and a significant problem in such scenarios, and focuses on the historical context to explain the decision to invade and the subsequent military failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership (London)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"601 - 611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership (London)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221103405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221103405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

领导力通常与一种特殊的决策形式联系在一起:果断。本文反思了决断的局限性和渐进主义在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的决定中的作用，以及西方和北约在过去10年的决策中所起的作用。它表明，在这种情况下，渐进主义既是一种合理的模式，也是一个重大问题，并着重于历史背景来解释入侵的决定和随后的军事失败。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Leadership, incrementalism and the repetition of history: A Ukrainian tragedy in four acts

Leadership is often associated with a particular form of decision-making: being decisive. This paper reflects on the limits of decisiveness and the role of incrementalism in the Russian decision to invade Ukraine and the role of the West and NATO’s decision-making over the prior 10 years. It suggests that incrementalism is both a legitimate mode and a significant problem in such scenarios, and focuses on the historical context to explain the decision to invade and the subsequent military failures.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Leadership (London)

自引率

0.00%

发文量