威权主义的回归与女权主义的颠覆:对俄罗斯和塞尔维亚跨国女权主义的再思考

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Social Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1093/sp/jxad023
L. Bias
{"title":"威权主义的回归与女权主义的颠覆:对俄罗斯和塞尔维亚跨国女权主义的再思考","authors":"L. Bias","doi":"10.1093/sp/jxad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the effect of rising authoritarianism on Russian and Serbian feminists. In both cases, regimes rely on what I term “Othering back.” Using “gender ideology” as a proxy for Western imperialism, they reappropriate postcolonial frames to reject democratization and human rights. In such a context, the critical argument that transnational feminism is an exercise of Western Othering to reify power relations no longer resonates with feminists on the ground. To them it dangerously resonates with their own regime’s discourse. The article first traces how the regimes conduct authoritarian Othering back. Based on interpretive discourse analysis, applied to sixty-nine interviews, it then shows how Russian and Serbian feminists make sense of this political environment and the new strategies they derive from their interpretation: the need for discursive subversion that articulates alternative imaginaries of transnational feminism that cannot be reappropriated by the regime.","PeriodicalId":47441,"journal":{"name":"Social Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authoritarian Othering Back and Feminist Subversion: Rethinking Transnational Feminism in Russia and Serbia\",\"authors\":\"L. Bias\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sp/jxad023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines the effect of rising authoritarianism on Russian and Serbian feminists. In both cases, regimes rely on what I term “Othering back.” Using “gender ideology” as a proxy for Western imperialism, they reappropriate postcolonial frames to reject democratization and human rights. In such a context, the critical argument that transnational feminism is an exercise of Western Othering to reify power relations no longer resonates with feminists on the ground. To them it dangerously resonates with their own regime’s discourse. The article first traces how the regimes conduct authoritarian Othering back. Based on interpretive discourse analysis, applied to sixty-nine interviews, it then shows how Russian and Serbian feminists make sense of this political environment and the new strategies they derive from their interpretation: the need for discursive subversion that articulates alternative imaginaries of transnational feminism that cannot be reappropriated by the regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxad023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxad023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了崛起的威权主义对俄罗斯和塞尔维亚女权主义者的影响。在这两种情况下,政权都依赖于我所说的“对方回来”。他们利用“性别意识形态”作为西方帝国主义的代理,重新使用后殖民框架来拒绝民主化和人权。在这样的背景下,认为跨国女权主义是西方他者(Western Othering)对权力关系物化的一种实践的批评性论点,不再与实地的女权主义者产生共鸣。对他们来说,这与他们自己政权的话语产生了危险的共鸣。文章首先追溯了这些政权是如何进行专制统治的。基于解释性话语分析,应用于69个访谈,然后展示了俄罗斯和塞尔维亚女权主义者如何理解这种政治环境,以及他们从他们的解释中得出的新策略:需要话语颠覆,阐明跨国女权主义的另一种想象,不能被政权重新占用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authoritarian Othering Back and Feminist Subversion: Rethinking Transnational Feminism in Russia and Serbia
This article examines the effect of rising authoritarianism on Russian and Serbian feminists. In both cases, regimes rely on what I term “Othering back.” Using “gender ideology” as a proxy for Western imperialism, they reappropriate postcolonial frames to reject democratization and human rights. In such a context, the critical argument that transnational feminism is an exercise of Western Othering to reify power relations no longer resonates with feminists on the ground. To them it dangerously resonates with their own regime’s discourse. The article first traces how the regimes conduct authoritarian Othering back. Based on interpretive discourse analysis, applied to sixty-nine interviews, it then shows how Russian and Serbian feminists make sense of this political environment and the new strategies they derive from their interpretation: the need for discursive subversion that articulates alternative imaginaries of transnational feminism that cannot be reappropriated by the regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Politics
Social Politics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Social Politics is the journal for incisive analyses of gender, politics and policy across the globe. It takes on the critical emerging issues of our age: globalization, transnationality and citizenship, migration, diversity and its intersections, the restructuring of capitalisms and states. We engage with feminist theoretical issues and with theories of welfare regimes, "varieties of capitalism," the ideational and cultural turns in social science, governmentality and postcolonialism. We are looking for articles that engage in this exciting mix of debates that will be of interest to our multidisciplinary and international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信