5种市售摩丝产品对犬皮肤表面和毛发的残余抗菌效果评价。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Chia-Yen Wu, Rebecca Parsiola, Mark Mitchell, Maria S. Mitchell, Sara Ramos, I. Ravera, C. Pucheu-Haston
{"title":"5种市售摩丝产品对犬皮肤表面和毛发的残余抗菌效果评价。","authors":"Chia-Yen Wu, Rebecca Parsiola, Mark Mitchell, Maria S. Mitchell, Sara Ramos, I. Ravera, C. Pucheu-Haston","doi":"10.31390/gradschool_theses.5625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAntibacterial effect studies of commercial antiseptics typically have evaluated hair and not the skin.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate the antibacterial effects of mousse products on both canine skin and hair.\n\n\nANIMALS\nFifteen short-haired and eight long-haired dogs without skin disease.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nFive mousses were applied once: (1) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole; (2) 0.05% phytosphingosine; (3) 2% salicylic acid and 10% ethyl lactate; (4) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole; and (5) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole. Skin swabs and hair were collected from application sites before treatment, and at 1 h and at Day (D)2, D4, D8, D10 and D14 post-treatment. Skin swabs and hair were placed on Mueller-Hinton plates inoculated with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius inoculum suspension. Inhibition zones were measured after incubation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nInhibition was not noted with mousses 2 and 3. In mousse 5, inhibition zone sizes produced by swabs from long- and short-haired dogs were not significantly different (p = 0.105), and all swabs and hair produced inhibition until D14, regardless of hair length. By contrast, in mousse 1, inhibition zones produced by swabs from long-haired dogs were smaller than those from short-haired dogs (p < 0.001), and swabs from long-haired dogs produced a shorter duration of bacterial inhibition than hair.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE\nThe antibacterial effects of mousse 5 were not affected by hair length. Hair may be acceptable for evaluating effects on the skin in short-haired dogs. However, long hair may interfere with product distribution and duration of bacterial inhibition. Therefore, the evaluation of hair alone may overestimate clinically relevant antibacterial effects.","PeriodicalId":23599,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary dermatology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of residual antibacterial effects on canine skin surface and hair following treatment with five commercial mousse products against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Yen Wu, Rebecca Parsiola, Mark Mitchell, Maria S. Mitchell, Sara Ramos, I. Ravera, C. Pucheu-Haston\",\"doi\":\"10.31390/gradschool_theses.5625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nAntibacterial effect studies of commercial antiseptics typically have evaluated hair and not the skin.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVES\\nTo evaluate the antibacterial effects of mousse products on both canine skin and hair.\\n\\n\\nANIMALS\\nFifteen short-haired and eight long-haired dogs without skin disease.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nFive mousses were applied once: (1) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole; (2) 0.05% phytosphingosine; (3) 2% salicylic acid and 10% ethyl lactate; (4) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole; and (5) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole. Skin swabs and hair were collected from application sites before treatment, and at 1 h and at Day (D)2, D4, D8, D10 and D14 post-treatment. Skin swabs and hair were placed on Mueller-Hinton plates inoculated with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius inoculum suspension. Inhibition zones were measured after incubation.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nInhibition was not noted with mousses 2 and 3. In mousse 5, inhibition zone sizes produced by swabs from long- and short-haired dogs were not significantly different (p = 0.105), and all swabs and hair produced inhibition until D14, regardless of hair length. By contrast, in mousse 1, inhibition zones produced by swabs from long-haired dogs were smaller than those from short-haired dogs (p < 0.001), and swabs from long-haired dogs produced a shorter duration of bacterial inhibition than hair.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE\\nThe antibacterial effects of mousse 5 were not affected by hair length. Hair may be acceptable for evaluating effects on the skin in short-haired dogs. However, long hair may interfere with product distribution and duration of bacterial inhibition. Therefore, the evaluation of hair alone may overestimate clinically relevant antibacterial effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary dermatology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_theses.5625\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_theses.5625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

商业杀菌剂的抗菌效果研究通常是评估头发而不是皮肤。目的评价摩丝产品对犬皮肤和毛发的抗菌作用。动物:15只短毛犬,8只长毛犬,无皮肤病。材料与方法5种摩丝1次使用:(1)2%氯己定和2%咪康唑;(2) 0.05%植鞘醇;(3) 2%水杨酸和10%乳酸乙酯;(4) 3%氯己定、0.5%克里巴唑;(5) 2%氯己定、1%酮康唑。治疗前、治疗后1小时、第2天、第4天、第8天、第10天、第14天采集涂抹部位的皮肤拭子和毛发。将皮肤拭子和头发置于接种了假中间葡萄球菌接种悬浮液的Mueller-Hinton板上。孵育后测定抑制区。结果摩丝2和摩丝3无明显抑制作用。在摩丝5中,来自长毛犬和短发犬的拭子产生的抑制区大小没有显著差异(p = 0.105),并且直到D14,无论毛发长度如何,所有拭子和毛发都产生抑制。相比之下,在摩丝1中,来自长毛狗的拭子产生的抑制区比来自短毛狗的要小(p < 0.001),并且来自长毛狗的拭子产生的细菌抑制持续时间比头发短。结论及临床意义摩丝5的抑菌效果不受头发长度的影响。毛发可用于评估短毛犬对皮肤的影响。然而,长发可能会干扰产品的分布和细菌抑制的持续时间。因此,单独评价毛发可能会高估临床相关的抗菌作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of residual antibacterial effects on canine skin surface and hair following treatment with five commercial mousse products against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.
BACKGROUND Antibacterial effect studies of commercial antiseptics typically have evaluated hair and not the skin. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the antibacterial effects of mousse products on both canine skin and hair. ANIMALS Fifteen short-haired and eight long-haired dogs without skin disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five mousses were applied once: (1) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole; (2) 0.05% phytosphingosine; (3) 2% salicylic acid and 10% ethyl lactate; (4) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole; and (5) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole. Skin swabs and hair were collected from application sites before treatment, and at 1 h and at Day (D)2, D4, D8, D10 and D14 post-treatment. Skin swabs and hair were placed on Mueller-Hinton plates inoculated with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius inoculum suspension. Inhibition zones were measured after incubation. RESULTS Inhibition was not noted with mousses 2 and 3. In mousse 5, inhibition zone sizes produced by swabs from long- and short-haired dogs were not significantly different (p = 0.105), and all swabs and hair produced inhibition until D14, regardless of hair length. By contrast, in mousse 1, inhibition zones produced by swabs from long-haired dogs were smaller than those from short-haired dogs (p < 0.001), and swabs from long-haired dogs produced a shorter duration of bacterial inhibition than hair. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The antibacterial effects of mousse 5 were not affected by hair length. Hair may be acceptable for evaluating effects on the skin in short-haired dogs. However, long hair may interfere with product distribution and duration of bacterial inhibition. Therefore, the evaluation of hair alone may overestimate clinically relevant antibacterial effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary dermatology
Veterinary dermatology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Dermatology is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed, international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of the skin of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Scientific research papers, clinical case reports and reviews covering the following aspects of dermatology will be considered for publication: -Skin structure (anatomy, histology, ultrastructure) -Skin function (physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, genetics) -Skin microbiology and parasitology -Dermatopathology -Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases -New disease entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信