{"title":"制作我的旋律:用疯狂的引文实践在书目中建立心爱的社区","authors":"Sarah Madoka Currie","doi":"10.1353/crt.2022.a899735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Bibliography can be reconstructed to privilege the imaginaries of radicals that are \"lesser known.\" The dis-visibilizing of marginalized neurodiverse scholars and theorycrafters has much in common with the institutionalization approaches that constrict and model obstructed life for neurodivergent bodyminds. In a proposal for mad citation practice, a series of hopeful strategies for nonretrofitted inclusivity and authorial diversity are constructed for the reader instead, which bear similarities to feminist and disabled care practices: explicit permission-setting, naming ontology, lived or living experience validity, commentary or subscript authorization, visibilized quotation selection, draft approval, and cocollaborator approvals all form the basis of a radically collaborative citation methodology that seeks to generate roundtable-format conversations in print, ones that are self-selected within mad communities and feature a heavy roster of neurodivergent or disabled scholars, artists, and authors. In mad citation, the draft writer is less the \"manuscript author\" and more equivalent to a \"conversation facilitator,\" charged with weaving the myriad kaleidoscopic voices of the movement they seek to represent. This refiguring of the author/collaborator and reader/writer valences are central to a citation futurity that situates power not in the hands of the scholar holding the pen but in the hands of the collective they seek to speak with.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Make Mine Melody: Building Beloved Community in Bibliography Using Mad Citation Practice\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Madoka Currie\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/crt.2022.a899735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Bibliography can be reconstructed to privilege the imaginaries of radicals that are \\\"lesser known.\\\" The dis-visibilizing of marginalized neurodiverse scholars and theorycrafters has much in common with the institutionalization approaches that constrict and model obstructed life for neurodivergent bodyminds. In a proposal for mad citation practice, a series of hopeful strategies for nonretrofitted inclusivity and authorial diversity are constructed for the reader instead, which bear similarities to feminist and disabled care practices: explicit permission-setting, naming ontology, lived or living experience validity, commentary or subscript authorization, visibilized quotation selection, draft approval, and cocollaborator approvals all form the basis of a radically collaborative citation methodology that seeks to generate roundtable-format conversations in print, ones that are self-selected within mad communities and feature a heavy roster of neurodivergent or disabled scholars, artists, and authors. In mad citation, the draft writer is less the \\\"manuscript author\\\" and more equivalent to a \\\"conversation facilitator,\\\" charged with weaving the myriad kaleidoscopic voices of the movement they seek to represent. This refiguring of the author/collaborator and reader/writer valences are central to a citation futurity that situates power not in the hands of the scholar holding the pen but in the hands of the collective they seek to speak with.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.a899735\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.a899735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Make Mine Melody: Building Beloved Community in Bibliography Using Mad Citation Practice
Abstract:Bibliography can be reconstructed to privilege the imaginaries of radicals that are "lesser known." The dis-visibilizing of marginalized neurodiverse scholars and theorycrafters has much in common with the institutionalization approaches that constrict and model obstructed life for neurodivergent bodyminds. In a proposal for mad citation practice, a series of hopeful strategies for nonretrofitted inclusivity and authorial diversity are constructed for the reader instead, which bear similarities to feminist and disabled care practices: explicit permission-setting, naming ontology, lived or living experience validity, commentary or subscript authorization, visibilized quotation selection, draft approval, and cocollaborator approvals all form the basis of a radically collaborative citation methodology that seeks to generate roundtable-format conversations in print, ones that are self-selected within mad communities and feature a heavy roster of neurodivergent or disabled scholars, artists, and authors. In mad citation, the draft writer is less the "manuscript author" and more equivalent to a "conversation facilitator," charged with weaving the myriad kaleidoscopic voices of the movement they seek to represent. This refiguring of the author/collaborator and reader/writer valences are central to a citation futurity that situates power not in the hands of the scholar holding the pen but in the hands of the collective they seek to speak with.
期刊介绍:
Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.