质疑人类世:对人类时代的批判性评估

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Germain
{"title":"质疑人类世:对人类时代的批判性评估","authors":"Germain","doi":"10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Anthropocene denotes the Earth’s entry into the age of humankind. A growing chorus of expert opinion now claims the fate of “the Earth system” lies squarely in human hands. Acknowledging the scale of human agency and its impact upon environmental processes, this article questions the largely unthought assumptions that facilitate the view that our species constitutes the determining factor regarding the planet’s fate. The central premise examined here underpins the technological worldview, the perception of reality that fuels the project of mastering nature. This reading of reality posits that nature is conquerable. Its guiding assumption is that the judicious application of increasingly sophisticated forms of technological know-how can yield a world reworked in ways that have reality conform fully to our designs for it. Using Jean Baudrillard’s thoughts on technology as inspiration and guide, the technological imaginary—inspired by dreams of an “integral reality”—is exposed as founded on a profound misreading of the nature of the real. An alternative reading of reality is proffered that holds that the world is not constituted in a way that permits its perfectibility. This counterinterpretation suggests that we ought to reinterpret humanism in a way that acknowledges the limits of the enterprise to remake reality in humanity’s own image. Relinquishing the self-imposed demand to realize the future we wish for, it is concluded, is the surest way to regain the equilibrium we have lost with our entry into the Anthropocene.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the Anthropocene: A Critical Assessment of the Age of Humankind\",\"authors\":\"Germain\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Anthropocene denotes the Earth’s entry into the age of humankind. A growing chorus of expert opinion now claims the fate of “the Earth system” lies squarely in human hands. Acknowledging the scale of human agency and its impact upon environmental processes, this article questions the largely unthought assumptions that facilitate the view that our species constitutes the determining factor regarding the planet’s fate. The central premise examined here underpins the technological worldview, the perception of reality that fuels the project of mastering nature. This reading of reality posits that nature is conquerable. Its guiding assumption is that the judicious application of increasingly sophisticated forms of technological know-how can yield a world reworked in ways that have reality conform fully to our designs for it. Using Jean Baudrillard’s thoughts on technology as inspiration and guide, the technological imaginary—inspired by dreams of an “integral reality”—is exposed as founded on a profound misreading of the nature of the real. An alternative reading of reality is proffered that holds that the world is not constituted in a way that permits its perfectibility. This counterinterpretation suggests that we ought to reinterpret humanism in a way that acknowledges the limits of the enterprise to remake reality in humanity’s own image. Relinquishing the self-imposed demand to realize the future we wish for, it is concluded, is the surest way to regain the equilibrium we have lost with our entry into the Anthropocene.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人类世标志着地球进入人类时代。越来越多的专家一致认为,“地球系统”的命运完全掌握在人类手中。承认人类行为的规模及其对环境进程的影响,这篇文章质疑了很大程度上未经考虑的假设,这些假设促进了我们物种构成决定地球命运的观点。这里考察的中心前提是技术世界观的基础,即对现实的感知,为掌握自然的项目提供动力。这种对现实的解读假定自然是可以征服的。它的指导假设是,明智地应用日益复杂的技术知识形式,可以产生一个重新设计的世界,使现实完全符合我们对它的设计。利用让·鲍德里亚关于技术的思想作为灵感和指导,技术想象——受到“整体现实”的梦想的启发——被暴露为建立在对现实本质的深刻误读之上。对现实的另一种解读认为,世界不是以一种允许其完美的方式构成的。这种反解释表明,我们应该以一种承认以人类自己的形象重塑现实的企业的局限性的方式重新解释人文主义。结论是,放弃自我强加的要求以实现我们所希望的未来,是恢复我们进入人类世时失去的平衡的最可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questioning the Anthropocene: A Critical Assessment of the Age of Humankind
The Anthropocene denotes the Earth’s entry into the age of humankind. A growing chorus of expert opinion now claims the fate of “the Earth system” lies squarely in human hands. Acknowledging the scale of human agency and its impact upon environmental processes, this article questions the largely unthought assumptions that facilitate the view that our species constitutes the determining factor regarding the planet’s fate. The central premise examined here underpins the technological worldview, the perception of reality that fuels the project of mastering nature. This reading of reality posits that nature is conquerable. Its guiding assumption is that the judicious application of increasingly sophisticated forms of technological know-how can yield a world reworked in ways that have reality conform fully to our designs for it. Using Jean Baudrillard’s thoughts on technology as inspiration and guide, the technological imaginary—inspired by dreams of an “integral reality”—is exposed as founded on a profound misreading of the nature of the real. An alternative reading of reality is proffered that holds that the world is not constituted in a way that permits its perfectibility. This counterinterpretation suggests that we ought to reinterpret humanism in a way that acknowledges the limits of the enterprise to remake reality in humanity’s own image. Relinquishing the self-imposed demand to realize the future we wish for, it is concluded, is the surest way to regain the equilibrium we have lost with our entry into the Anthropocene.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信