空间距离和信号对注意力分散效应的影响

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Sven Cammeraat , Gertjan Rop , Bjorn B. de Koning
{"title":"空间距离和信号对注意力分散效应的影响","authors":"Sven Cammeraat ,&nbsp;Gertjan Rop ,&nbsp;Bjorn B. de Koning","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2019.106203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The split-attention effect seems a robust finding in the literature and shows that complex learning materials consisting of text and pictures lead to better learning when they are spatially integrated instead of spatially separated. In the current study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. In Experiment 1, a 2 × 2 design was used in which spatial distance (large vs. small) and signaling (signaling vs. no signaling) were manipulated, while in Experiment 2 it was tried to replicate the split-attention effect previously observed with the learning materials used in Experiment 1. In contrast to our hypotheses, spatial distance and signaling did not influence mental effort ratings and transfer performance in Experiment 1. Moreover, no split-attention effect was found on retention, transfer or mental effort ratings in Experiment 2. As no split-attention effect was obtained with the learning materials, it is not possible to examine the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. Concluding, the current results raise doubts about how robust the split-attention effect is, and demonstrate the importance of replication studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 106203"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106203","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of spatial distance and signaling on the split-attention effect\",\"authors\":\"Sven Cammeraat ,&nbsp;Gertjan Rop ,&nbsp;Bjorn B. de Koning\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2019.106203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The split-attention effect seems a robust finding in the literature and shows that complex learning materials consisting of text and pictures lead to better learning when they are spatially integrated instead of spatially separated. In the current study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. In Experiment 1, a 2 × 2 design was used in which spatial distance (large vs. small) and signaling (signaling vs. no signaling) were manipulated, while in Experiment 2 it was tried to replicate the split-attention effect previously observed with the learning materials used in Experiment 1. In contrast to our hypotheses, spatial distance and signaling did not influence mental effort ratings and transfer performance in Experiment 1. Moreover, no split-attention effect was found on retention, transfer or mental effort ratings in Experiment 2. As no split-attention effect was obtained with the learning materials, it is not possible to examine the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. Concluding, the current results raise doubts about how robust the split-attention effect is, and demonstrate the importance of replication studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106203\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219304236\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219304236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在文献中,注意力分散效应似乎是一个强有力的发现,它表明,由文字和图片组成的复杂学习材料,当它们在空间上整合而不是在空间上分离时,学习效果会更好。本研究通过两个实验探讨了距离和信号对分离注意效应的影响。实验1采用2 × 2设计,对空间距离(大与小)和信号(有信号与无信号)进行控制,实验2试图复制实验1中使用的学习材料所观察到的注意力分裂效应。与我们的假设相反,在实验1中,空间距离和信号不影响心理努力评分和转移表现。此外,在实验2中没有发现注意力分散对保留、转移和精神努力评分的影响。由于学习材料没有获得分散注意效应,因此无法检验距离和信号对分散注意效应的影响。总之,目前的结果提出了对注意力分散效应是否强大的质疑,并证明了复制研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of spatial distance and signaling on the split-attention effect

The split-attention effect seems a robust finding in the literature and shows that complex learning materials consisting of text and pictures lead to better learning when they are spatially integrated instead of spatially separated. In the current study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. In Experiment 1, a 2 × 2 design was used in which spatial distance (large vs. small) and signaling (signaling vs. no signaling) were manipulated, while in Experiment 2 it was tried to replicate the split-attention effect previously observed with the learning materials used in Experiment 1. In contrast to our hypotheses, spatial distance and signaling did not influence mental effort ratings and transfer performance in Experiment 1. Moreover, no split-attention effect was found on retention, transfer or mental effort ratings in Experiment 2. As no split-attention effect was obtained with the learning materials, it is not possible to examine the effects of distance and signaling on the split-attention effect. Concluding, the current results raise doubts about how robust the split-attention effect is, and demonstrate the importance of replication studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信