浴室真菌污染的最新趋势

N. Hamada
{"title":"浴室真菌污染的最新趋势","authors":"N. Hamada","doi":"10.11468/SEIKATSUEISEI.53.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison was made of fungal flora in bathrooms in 1997 and in 2007 to clarify the trend of fungal contamination and the causative factors. In 1997, Cladosporium and Exophiala were predominant on the walls and floors of bathrooms. In 2007, the fungal count on walls was lower than in 1997, and not only Cladosporium, but also Exophiala, Cladophialophora, Phoma, and Scolecobasidium were frequently observed. Cladosporium was found to be more common in bathrooms of the classic type with cement surfaces. In contrast, Exophiala, Phoma, Cladophialophora and Scolecobasidium were predominant in bathrooms of the modular type made of plastic boards, which have recently become more common than the classic type. Moreover, fungal contamination involving these four fungi, was often found on toys, soap dishes, and drain mouths made of plastic materials. These four fungi are known to use surfactant as nutrient, and surfactant may thus be more difficult to wash away from plastic than from tile and cement. The factors affecting the fungal flora on bathroom walls and floors were also compared. On both sampling occasions, more fungal contamination was detected in bathrooms located on lower floors or used by larger families than in those on upper floors or used by smaller families. Fungal contamination in bathrooms with dryer fans , which have recently become common, was about half of that in those without. Factors removing moisture from bathrooms were therefore thought to reduce fungal contamination. However, reducing fungal contamination is more difficult on floors than on walls, and no effective method has yet been found in spite of various improvements in materials and structure.","PeriodicalId":17443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Living and Health Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Trend of Fungal Contamination in Bathrooms\",\"authors\":\"N. Hamada\",\"doi\":\"10.11468/SEIKATSUEISEI.53.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison was made of fungal flora in bathrooms in 1997 and in 2007 to clarify the trend of fungal contamination and the causative factors. In 1997, Cladosporium and Exophiala were predominant on the walls and floors of bathrooms. In 2007, the fungal count on walls was lower than in 1997, and not only Cladosporium, but also Exophiala, Cladophialophora, Phoma, and Scolecobasidium were frequently observed. Cladosporium was found to be more common in bathrooms of the classic type with cement surfaces. In contrast, Exophiala, Phoma, Cladophialophora and Scolecobasidium were predominant in bathrooms of the modular type made of plastic boards, which have recently become more common than the classic type. Moreover, fungal contamination involving these four fungi, was often found on toys, soap dishes, and drain mouths made of plastic materials. These four fungi are known to use surfactant as nutrient, and surfactant may thus be more difficult to wash away from plastic than from tile and cement. The factors affecting the fungal flora on bathroom walls and floors were also compared. On both sampling occasions, more fungal contamination was detected in bathrooms located on lower floors or used by larger families than in those on upper floors or used by smaller families. Fungal contamination in bathrooms with dryer fans , which have recently become common, was about half of that in those without. Factors removing moisture from bathrooms were therefore thought to reduce fungal contamination. However, reducing fungal contamination is more difficult on floors than on walls, and no effective method has yet been found in spite of various improvements in materials and structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Living and Health Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Living and Health Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11468/SEIKATSUEISEI.53.247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Living and Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11468/SEIKATSUEISEI.53.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对1997年和2007年浴室真菌菌群进行了比较,阐明了真菌污染的趋势和致病因素。1997年,浴室的墙壁和地板上主要是Cladosporium和Exophiala。2007年壁面真菌数量较1997年有所下降,除枝孢菌外,还常见有外孢菌(Exophiala)、枝孢菌(Cladophialophora)、Phoma、Scolecobasidium。枝状孢子在水泥表面的经典类型的浴室中更为常见。相比之下,在塑料板制成的模块化浴室中,Exophiala、Phoma、Cladophialophora和Scolecobasidium占主导地位,这种类型最近比经典类型更常见。此外,包括这四种真菌的真菌污染,经常在玩具、肥皂盘子和塑料材料制成的排水口上发现。众所周知,这四种真菌以表面活性剂为营养物质,因此表面活性剂可能比瓷砖和水泥更难从塑料上洗掉。并对影响浴室墙壁和地板真菌菌群的因素进行了比较。在两次取样中,位于较低楼层或大家庭使用的浴室比位于较高楼层或较小家庭使用的浴室检测到更多的真菌污染。在最近变得普遍的有烘干机风扇的浴室里,真菌污染大约是那些没有风扇的浴室的一半。因此,从浴室中去除水分的因素被认为可以减少真菌污染。然而,在地板上减少真菌污染比在墙壁上更难,尽管在材料和结构上进行了各种改进,但尚未找到有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Trend of Fungal Contamination in Bathrooms
A comparison was made of fungal flora in bathrooms in 1997 and in 2007 to clarify the trend of fungal contamination and the causative factors. In 1997, Cladosporium and Exophiala were predominant on the walls and floors of bathrooms. In 2007, the fungal count on walls was lower than in 1997, and not only Cladosporium, but also Exophiala, Cladophialophora, Phoma, and Scolecobasidium were frequently observed. Cladosporium was found to be more common in bathrooms of the classic type with cement surfaces. In contrast, Exophiala, Phoma, Cladophialophora and Scolecobasidium were predominant in bathrooms of the modular type made of plastic boards, which have recently become more common than the classic type. Moreover, fungal contamination involving these four fungi, was often found on toys, soap dishes, and drain mouths made of plastic materials. These four fungi are known to use surfactant as nutrient, and surfactant may thus be more difficult to wash away from plastic than from tile and cement. The factors affecting the fungal flora on bathroom walls and floors were also compared. On both sampling occasions, more fungal contamination was detected in bathrooms located on lower floors or used by larger families than in those on upper floors or used by smaller families. Fungal contamination in bathrooms with dryer fans , which have recently become common, was about half of that in those without. Factors removing moisture from bathrooms were therefore thought to reduce fungal contamination. However, reducing fungal contamination is more difficult on floors than on walls, and no effective method has yet been found in spite of various improvements in materials and structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信