根据教师的说法,在HBCU进行评估的最重要原因

Q4 Social Sciences
S. Culver, G. Phipps
{"title":"根据教师的说法,在HBCU进行评估的最重要原因","authors":"S. Culver, G. Phipps","doi":"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Since the emergence of assessment as a critical force in higher education, \"faculty involvement\" has repeatedly been identified as essential, yet approaches to assessment have been less than welcoming to faculty and tend to be more accountability- driven than learning-focused and improvement-driven. Past research on the perceptions of faculty regarding outcome assessment has tended to focus on the negative—why faculty are not interested or do not participate. For our study, we were interested in HBCU faculty perceptions regarding assessment, but from a positive perspective. Faculty were asked to distinguish importance among 15 items documented in the literature as benefits to doing assessment. Results indicate that faculty see assessment as taking care of accountability issues but also helping with curricular and program revisions. Interestingly, they see assessment as less likely to facilitate faculty discussions about curriculum. Implications for conducting assessment and further research are discussed. Keywords: faculty, perceptions, curriculum","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"According to Faculty, the Most Important Reasons for Doing Assessment at an HBCU\",\"authors\":\"S. Culver, G. Phipps\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Since the emergence of assessment as a critical force in higher education, \\\"faculty involvement\\\" has repeatedly been identified as essential, yet approaches to assessment have been less than welcoming to faculty and tend to be more accountability- driven than learning-focused and improvement-driven. Past research on the perceptions of faculty regarding outcome assessment has tended to focus on the negative—why faculty are not interested or do not participate. For our study, we were interested in HBCU faculty perceptions regarding assessment, but from a positive perspective. Faculty were asked to distinguish importance among 15 items documented in the literature as benefits to doing assessment. Results indicate that faculty see assessment as taking care of accountability issues but also helping with curricular and program revisions. Interestingly, they see assessment as less likely to facilitate faculty discussions about curriculum. Implications for conducting assessment and further research are discussed. Keywords: faculty, perceptions, curriculum\",\"PeriodicalId\":56185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:自从评估作为高等教育的关键力量出现以来,“教师参与”一再被认为是必不可少的,然而评估的方法并不受教师的欢迎,而且往往更多地以问责为导向,而不是以学习为中心和以改进为导向。过去关于教师对结果评估的看法的研究往往集中在消极的方面——为什么教师不感兴趣或不参与。在我们的研究中,我们对HBCU教师对评估的看法感兴趣,但从积极的角度来看。教师被要求从文献中记录的15个项目中区分出评估的重要性。结果表明,教师们认为评估可以解决问责问题,但也有助于课程和项目的修订。有趣的是,他们认为评估不太可能促进教师对课程的讨论。讨论了开展评估和进一步研究的意义。关键词:教师,观念,课程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
According to Faculty, the Most Important Reasons for Doing Assessment at an HBCU
abstract:Since the emergence of assessment as a critical force in higher education, "faculty involvement" has repeatedly been identified as essential, yet approaches to assessment have been less than welcoming to faculty and tend to be more accountability- driven than learning-focused and improvement-driven. Past research on the perceptions of faculty regarding outcome assessment has tended to focus on the negative—why faculty are not interested or do not participate. For our study, we were interested in HBCU faculty perceptions regarding assessment, but from a positive perspective. Faculty were asked to distinguish importance among 15 items documented in the literature as benefits to doing assessment. Results indicate that faculty see assessment as taking care of accountability issues but also helping with curricular and program revisions. Interestingly, they see assessment as less likely to facilitate faculty discussions about curriculum. Implications for conducting assessment and further research are discussed. Keywords: faculty, perceptions, curriculum
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信