颅咽管瘤的生长模式由鞍膈肿瘤的起源和开口的能力决定:内镜鼻内手术时代的重新评价

Yong Hwy Kim, J. Phi, Seung-Ki Kim, K. Wang
{"title":"颅咽管瘤的生长模式由鞍膈肿瘤的起源和开口的能力决定:内镜鼻内手术时代的重新评价","authors":"Yong Hwy Kim, J. Phi, Seung-Ki Kim, K. Wang","doi":"10.55911/jksbs.23.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Advances in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have increased the under-standing of craniopharyngioma anatomy. We have previously proposed a relationship among cranio-pharyngioma growth pattern, their origin relative to the diaphragm sellae, and their aperture compe-tency. To reappraise that relationship, we retrospectively reviewed the diaphragm sellae anatomy of patients who underwent EEA for craniopharyngioma. Materials and Methods: From May 2010 to January 2013, thirty five patients underwent EEA procedures for craniopharyngiomas. Twenty patients without a surgical history were included in the study, and medical records describing the spatial relations between the tumors and the diaphragma sellae were reviewed and correlated with the tumor growth patterns on preoperative images. Results: All of the tumors were completely removed. Three prechiasmatic tumors were located un-der intact diaphragma sellae. Six retrochiasmatic tumors were composed of supra- and subdiaphrag-matic components that were continuous through an incomplete aperture of the diaphragm. Eleven retrochiasmatic tumors were located above intact diaphragms. Visual symptoms were normalized or improved in twelve of the sixteen patients with preoperative visual deficits. Preoperative hypotha-lamic dysfunction was recovered in ten of twelve patients. Conclusions: The EEA revealed the detailed tumor anatomy and confirmed our previous hypoth-esis that craniopharyngioma growth patterns are principally determined by the origin of the tumor relative to the diaphragma sellae and by the aperture competency. The EEA is indicated for removing both prechiasmatic and retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas.","PeriodicalId":49515,"journal":{"name":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"27 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth pattern of craniopharyngioma determined by the origin of tumor regarding diaphragma sellae and the competency of the aperture: Reappraisal in the era of endoscopic endonasal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Yong Hwy Kim, J. Phi, Seung-Ki Kim, K. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.55911/jksbs.23.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Advances in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have increased the under-standing of craniopharyngioma anatomy. We have previously proposed a relationship among cranio-pharyngioma growth pattern, their origin relative to the diaphragm sellae, and their aperture compe-tency. To reappraise that relationship, we retrospectively reviewed the diaphragm sellae anatomy of patients who underwent EEA for craniopharyngioma. Materials and Methods: From May 2010 to January 2013, thirty five patients underwent EEA procedures for craniopharyngiomas. Twenty patients without a surgical history were included in the study, and medical records describing the spatial relations between the tumors and the diaphragma sellae were reviewed and correlated with the tumor growth patterns on preoperative images. Results: All of the tumors were completely removed. Three prechiasmatic tumors were located un-der intact diaphragma sellae. Six retrochiasmatic tumors were composed of supra- and subdiaphrag-matic components that were continuous through an incomplete aperture of the diaphragm. Eleven retrochiasmatic tumors were located above intact diaphragms. Visual symptoms were normalized or improved in twelve of the sixteen patients with preoperative visual deficits. Preoperative hypotha-lamic dysfunction was recovered in ten of twelve patients. Conclusions: The EEA revealed the detailed tumor anatomy and confirmed our previous hypoth-esis that craniopharyngioma growth patterns are principally determined by the origin of the tumor relative to the diaphragma sellae and by the aperture competency. The EEA is indicated for removing both prechiasmatic and retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\"27 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55911/jksbs.23.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55911/jksbs.23.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜鼻内入路(EEA)的进展增加了对颅咽管瘤解剖的认识。我们之前提出颅咽瘤的生长模式,其相对于膈鞍的起源和它们的孔径能力之间的关系。为了重新评估这种关系,我们回顾性地回顾了颅咽管瘤患者行EEA的膈鞍解剖。材料与方法:2010年5月至2013年1月,35例颅咽管瘤患者行EEA手术。本研究纳入了20例无手术史的患者,并回顾了描述肿瘤与鞍膈之间空间关系的医疗记录,并将其与术前图像上的肿瘤生长模式相关联。结果:所有肿瘤均完全切除。三个交叉前肿瘤位于完整的鞍膈下。六个交叉后肿瘤由膈上和膈下组成,它们通过膈的不完全孔连续。11个交叉后肿瘤位于完整膈上方。术前视力有缺陷的16例患者中有12例视力症状恢复正常或改善。术前,12例患者中有10例恢复了下丘脑功能障碍。结论:EEA显示了详细的肿瘤解剖结构,证实了我们之前的假设,颅咽管瘤的生长模式主要取决于肿瘤相对于鞍膈的起源和孔径能力。EEA适用于切除交叉前和交叉后颅咽管瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth pattern of craniopharyngioma determined by the origin of tumor regarding diaphragma sellae and the competency of the aperture: Reappraisal in the era of endoscopic endonasal surgery
Background: Advances in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have increased the under-standing of craniopharyngioma anatomy. We have previously proposed a relationship among cranio-pharyngioma growth pattern, their origin relative to the diaphragm sellae, and their aperture compe-tency. To reappraise that relationship, we retrospectively reviewed the diaphragm sellae anatomy of patients who underwent EEA for craniopharyngioma. Materials and Methods: From May 2010 to January 2013, thirty five patients underwent EEA procedures for craniopharyngiomas. Twenty patients without a surgical history were included in the study, and medical records describing the spatial relations between the tumors and the diaphragma sellae were reviewed and correlated with the tumor growth patterns on preoperative images. Results: All of the tumors were completely removed. Three prechiasmatic tumors were located un-der intact diaphragma sellae. Six retrochiasmatic tumors were composed of supra- and subdiaphrag-matic components that were continuous through an incomplete aperture of the diaphragm. Eleven retrochiasmatic tumors were located above intact diaphragms. Visual symptoms were normalized or improved in twelve of the sixteen patients with preoperative visual deficits. Preoperative hypotha-lamic dysfunction was recovered in ten of twelve patients. Conclusions: The EEA revealed the detailed tumor anatomy and confirmed our previous hypoth-esis that craniopharyngioma growth patterns are principally determined by the origin of the tumor relative to the diaphragma sellae and by the aperture competency. The EEA is indicated for removing both prechiasmatic and retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信