T. V. Forgerini, J. F. Ribeiro, R. Rocha, F. Soares, T. Lenzi
{"title":"蚀刻方式对通用胶粘剂与侵蚀牙本质粘合寿命的影响。","authors":"T. V. Forgerini, J. F. Ribeiro, R. Rocha, F. Soares, T. Lenzi","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a37723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE To assess the immediate and six-month microshear bond strength (µSBS) of a universal adhesive applied using different etching strategies on sound and eroded dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty bovine incisors were polished to obtain flat buccal dentin. Forty teeth were submitted to a pH-cycling model to simulate artificial erosion (3x/day cola drink for 7 days). Teeth from both dentin conditions (sound and eroded) were randomly assigned to four groups according to the adhesive and etching approach: a universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive), and as controls a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), and a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Four composite restorations (Z250) were built up on each dentin surface, using the area delimitation technique. Half of the specimens were evaluated in the µSBS test after 24 h of water storage, and the other half were evaluated six months later. Data (MPa) were analyzed with three-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS The µSBS values of all adhesives significantly decreased after six months of aging (p = 0.01). Lower µSBS values were obtained in eroded dentin (p = 0.04). The universal adhesive showed similar µSBS to the self-etch adhesive used as control, irrespective of the etching strategy. However, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive applied in self-etch mode performed better than the control etch-and-rinse adhesive (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The universal adhesive does not provide the same bonding efficacy on eroded dentin as on sound dentin, and its performance does not depend on the etching mode.","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"11 1","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Etching Mode on Bonding Longevity of a Universal Adhesive to Eroded Dentin.\",\"authors\":\"T. V. Forgerini, J. F. Ribeiro, R. Rocha, F. Soares, T. Lenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.a37723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE To assess the immediate and six-month microshear bond strength (µSBS) of a universal adhesive applied using different etching strategies on sound and eroded dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty bovine incisors were polished to obtain flat buccal dentin. Forty teeth were submitted to a pH-cycling model to simulate artificial erosion (3x/day cola drink for 7 days). Teeth from both dentin conditions (sound and eroded) were randomly assigned to four groups according to the adhesive and etching approach: a universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive), and as controls a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), and a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Four composite restorations (Z250) were built up on each dentin surface, using the area delimitation technique. Half of the specimens were evaluated in the µSBS test after 24 h of water storage, and the other half were evaluated six months later. Data (MPa) were analyzed with three-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS The µSBS values of all adhesives significantly decreased after six months of aging (p = 0.01). Lower µSBS values were obtained in eroded dentin (p = 0.04). The universal adhesive showed similar µSBS to the self-etch adhesive used as control, irrespective of the etching strategy. However, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive applied in self-etch mode performed better than the control etch-and-rinse adhesive (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The universal adhesive does not provide the same bonding efficacy on eroded dentin as on sound dentin, and its performance does not depend on the etching mode.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of adhesive dentistry\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"69-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of adhesive dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
目的研究一种通用胶粘剂不同蚀刻策略对健康牙本质和侵蚀牙本质的即时和六个月微剪切粘接强度(µSBS)。材料与方法对80只牛切牙进行磨光处理,获得平整的牙本质。将40颗牙齿放入ph循环模型中模拟人工侵蚀(每天喝3次可乐,持续7 天)。根据粘接和蚀刻方法,两种牙质状态(健全和侵蚀)的牙齿随机分为四组:一种是自蚀刻和蚀刻-冲洗模式的通用粘合剂(Scotchbond universal adhesive),另一种是两步蚀刻-冲洗粘合剂(Adper Single Bond Plus),另一种是两步自蚀刻粘合剂(Clearfil SE Bond)。采用面积划分技术,在每个牙本质表面建立4个复合修复体(Z250)。一半的标本在24 h的水储存后进行µSBS测试,另一半在6个月后进行评估。数据(MPa)采用三向重复测量方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α = 0.05)。结果6个月后,各胶粘剂的µSBS值均显著降低(p = 0.01)。侵蚀牙本质的µSBS值较低(p = 0.04)。无论蚀刻策略如何,通用胶粘剂表现出与自蚀刻胶粘剂相似的µSBS。然而,在自蚀刻模式下应用的Scotchbond通用粘合剂比对照蚀刻-冲洗粘合剂表现更好(p = 0.02)。结论通用胶粘剂对侵蚀牙本质的粘接效果不如对健全牙本质的粘接效果,其粘接效果与腐蚀方式无关。
Role of Etching Mode on Bonding Longevity of a Universal Adhesive to Eroded Dentin.
PURPOSE To assess the immediate and six-month microshear bond strength (µSBS) of a universal adhesive applied using different etching strategies on sound and eroded dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty bovine incisors were polished to obtain flat buccal dentin. Forty teeth were submitted to a pH-cycling model to simulate artificial erosion (3x/day cola drink for 7 days). Teeth from both dentin conditions (sound and eroded) were randomly assigned to four groups according to the adhesive and etching approach: a universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive), and as controls a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), and a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Four composite restorations (Z250) were built up on each dentin surface, using the area delimitation technique. Half of the specimens were evaluated in the µSBS test after 24 h of water storage, and the other half were evaluated six months later. Data (MPa) were analyzed with three-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS The µSBS values of all adhesives significantly decreased after six months of aging (p = 0.01). Lower µSBS values were obtained in eroded dentin (p = 0.04). The universal adhesive showed similar µSBS to the self-etch adhesive used as control, irrespective of the etching strategy. However, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive applied in self-etch mode performed better than the control etch-and-rinse adhesive (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The universal adhesive does not provide the same bonding efficacy on eroded dentin as on sound dentin, and its performance does not depend on the etching mode.