认知形态的标志及其起源

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
E. Engberg-Pedersen
{"title":"认知形态的标志及其起源","authors":"E. Engberg-Pedersen","doi":"10.1075/sl.19065.eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Native deaf signers express epistemic modality by different means: mental-state words, clause-internal particles,\n signs indicating hypothesis, and nonmanually. The data for this study come from two unrelated sign languages, Danish Sign Language\n and Japanese Sign Language. In dialogues the signers use both calques of majority-language words and signs that appear to have\n emerged in the sign languages only. Based on the multifunctionality of some word forms, the origin of the epistemic modal\n particles may be traced back to tags, interjections, and lexical signs, a route motivated by interaction and also found in\n unrelated spoken languages. Furthermore, in both sign languages, the first-person pronoun can be used, without a verb, as an\n epistemic “anchor” of a proposition, a construction that seems specific to languages in the gestural-visual modality. Another\n modality-specific feature is the possibility of transferring the expression of a marker of epistemic uncertainty from one\n articulator to another.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Markers of epistemic modality and their origins\",\"authors\":\"E. Engberg-Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sl.19065.eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Native deaf signers express epistemic modality by different means: mental-state words, clause-internal particles,\\n signs indicating hypothesis, and nonmanually. The data for this study come from two unrelated sign languages, Danish Sign Language\\n and Japanese Sign Language. In dialogues the signers use both calques of majority-language words and signs that appear to have\\n emerged in the sign languages only. Based on the multifunctionality of some word forms, the origin of the epistemic modal\\n particles may be traced back to tags, interjections, and lexical signs, a route motivated by interaction and also found in\\n unrelated spoken languages. Furthermore, in both sign languages, the first-person pronoun can be used, without a verb, as an\\n epistemic “anchor” of a proposition, a construction that seems specific to languages in the gestural-visual modality. Another\\n modality-specific feature is the possibility of transferring the expression of a marker of epistemic uncertainty from one\\n articulator to another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Language\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19065.eng\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19065.eng","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

聋人手语表达认知情态的方式不同:心理状态词、子句内部小品、暗示假设的符号和非手动。这项研究的数据来自两种不相关的手语,丹麦手语和日本手语。在对话中,手语者既使用多数语言单词的符号,也使用似乎只出现在手语中的符号。基于某些词形的多功能性,认知情态助词的起源可以追溯到标签、感叹词和词汇符号,这是一种由相互作用激发的途径,在不相关的口语中也有发现。此外,在两种手语中,第一人称代词可以在没有动词的情况下用作命题的认知“锚”,这种结构似乎是手势视觉形态语言所特有的。另一个特定于情态的特征是将认知不确定性标记的表达从一个发音者转移到另一个发音者的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Markers of epistemic modality and their origins
Native deaf signers express epistemic modality by different means: mental-state words, clause-internal particles, signs indicating hypothesis, and nonmanually. The data for this study come from two unrelated sign languages, Danish Sign Language and Japanese Sign Language. In dialogues the signers use both calques of majority-language words and signs that appear to have emerged in the sign languages only. Based on the multifunctionality of some word forms, the origin of the epistemic modal particles may be traced back to tags, interjections, and lexical signs, a route motivated by interaction and also found in unrelated spoken languages. Furthermore, in both sign languages, the first-person pronoun can be used, without a verb, as an epistemic “anchor” of a proposition, a construction that seems specific to languages in the gestural-visual modality. Another modality-specific feature is the possibility of transferring the expression of a marker of epistemic uncertainty from one articulator to another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信