消毒剂对医院临床分离菌的杀菌效果。(4)报告。

Takeshi Mori, Nobuo Shimizu, Masafumi Ohnishi, S. Sanada, Y. Koda, Masaharu Inoue, S. Kurono, H. Okada
{"title":"消毒剂对医院临床分离菌的杀菌效果。(4)报告。","authors":"Takeshi Mori, Nobuo Shimizu, Masafumi Ohnishi, S. Sanada, Y. Koda, Masaharu Inoue, S. Kurono, H. Okada","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At our hospital, we have been conducting experiments on the time course of bactericidal effectiveness of disinfectants against clinically isolated bacterial strains. In the present study, we investigated the following commonly used disinfectants; chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), povidone iodine (PVP-I) and alkyl diaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (ADG). The results showed that PVP-I exhibited the greatest bactericidal effect among these disinfectants with a bactericidal time of within 20 seconds for both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria. CHG, BAC and ADG appeared to have a relatively delayed bactericidal time against gram-positive bacteria and 7 of 9 strains tended to show resistance to these disinfectants. These findings point to the need to add ethanol in order to ensure the effectiveness of disinfec tion when using these agents. Furthermore, these disinfectants showed only poor bactericidal effectiveness at low concentrations against gram-negative bacteria, thus indicating that caution is needed when determining the appropriate concentration levels. Moreover, since our results for BAC and PVP-I differ from those described in our previous reports, extreme care is thus called for when determining the concentration levels and exposure times due to intrinsic bacterial factors and the time course of bactericidal effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":14621,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"11 1","pages":"652-658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bactericidal Effects of Disinfectants on Clinical Isolates from the Hospital. (Report 4).\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Mori, Nobuo Shimizu, Masafumi Ohnishi, S. Sanada, Y. Koda, Masaharu Inoue, S. Kurono, H. Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At our hospital, we have been conducting experiments on the time course of bactericidal effectiveness of disinfectants against clinically isolated bacterial strains. In the present study, we investigated the following commonly used disinfectants; chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), povidone iodine (PVP-I) and alkyl diaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (ADG). The results showed that PVP-I exhibited the greatest bactericidal effect among these disinfectants with a bactericidal time of within 20 seconds for both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria. CHG, BAC and ADG appeared to have a relatively delayed bactericidal time against gram-positive bacteria and 7 of 9 strains tended to show resistance to these disinfectants. These findings point to the need to add ethanol in order to ensure the effectiveness of disinfec tion when using these agents. Furthermore, these disinfectants showed only poor bactericidal effectiveness at low concentrations against gram-negative bacteria, thus indicating that caution is needed when determining the appropriate concentration levels. Moreover, since our results for BAC and PVP-I differ from those described in our previous reports, extreme care is thus called for when determining the concentration levels and exposure times due to intrinsic bacterial factors and the time course of bactericidal effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"652-658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在我院,我们一直在进行消毒剂对临床分离菌株杀菌效果的时间过程实验。在本研究中,我们调查了以下常用消毒剂;葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)、苯扎氯铵(BAC)、聚维酮碘(PVP-I)和烷基二氨基乙基甘氨酸盐酸盐(ADG)。结果表明,pvp - 1对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的杀菌时间均在20秒以内,杀菌效果最好。CHG、BAC和ADG对革兰氏阳性菌的杀菌时间相对延迟,9株菌株中有7株对这些消毒剂表现出耐药性。这些发现表明,在使用这些消毒剂时,需要添加乙醇以确保消毒的有效性。此外,这些消毒剂在低浓度下对革兰氏阴性菌的杀菌效果较差,因此在确定适当的浓度水平时需要谨慎。此外,由于我们的BAC和PVP-I的结果不同于我们之前的报告,因此在确定浓度水平和暴露时间时,由于内在的细菌因素和杀菌效果的时间过程,需要非常小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bactericidal Effects of Disinfectants on Clinical Isolates from the Hospital. (Report 4).
At our hospital, we have been conducting experiments on the time course of bactericidal effectiveness of disinfectants against clinically isolated bacterial strains. In the present study, we investigated the following commonly used disinfectants; chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), povidone iodine (PVP-I) and alkyl diaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (ADG). The results showed that PVP-I exhibited the greatest bactericidal effect among these disinfectants with a bactericidal time of within 20 seconds for both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria. CHG, BAC and ADG appeared to have a relatively delayed bactericidal time against gram-positive bacteria and 7 of 9 strains tended to show resistance to these disinfectants. These findings point to the need to add ethanol in order to ensure the effectiveness of disinfec tion when using these agents. Furthermore, these disinfectants showed only poor bactericidal effectiveness at low concentrations against gram-negative bacteria, thus indicating that caution is needed when determining the appropriate concentration levels. Moreover, since our results for BAC and PVP-I differ from those described in our previous reports, extreme care is thus called for when determining the concentration levels and exposure times due to intrinsic bacterial factors and the time course of bactericidal effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信