Anendd Jadhav, Bhushan P Mundada, Rahul V. Deshmukh, Umesh Bhutekar, A. Kala, Kapil Waghwani, Apoorva Mishra
{"title":"下颌支骨折:罕见解剖亚区综述","authors":"Anendd Jadhav, Bhushan P Mundada, Rahul V. Deshmukh, Umesh Bhutekar, A. Kala, Kapil Waghwani, Apoorva Mishra","doi":"10.1155/2015/954314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables analysed were age, sex, cause of injury, pretreatment occlusion, treatment given, period of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), and posttreatment occlusion. Results. Out of 388 mandibular fractures treated, ramus fractures were 12 (3.09%). In the present study, predominant cause of mandibular ramus fracture was road traffic accident (RTA) n = 07 (58.33%) followed by fall n = 04 (33.33%) and assault n = 1 (8.33%). The average age was 35.9 years with a male predilection. Of these, 9 patients were treated with ORIF while remaining 3 with closed treatment. The average MMF after closed treatment was 21 days and 3 to 5 days after ORIF. There was improvement in occlusion in all 12 patients posttreatment with no major complication except for reduced mouth opening in cases treated with ORIF which recovered with physiotherapy and muscle relaxants. Conclusion. Mandibular ramus fractures accounted for 3.09% with RTA as a common aetiology. ORIF of ramus fractures facilitated adequate functional and anatomic reduction with early return of function.","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite\",\"authors\":\"Anendd Jadhav, Bhushan P Mundada, Rahul V. Deshmukh, Umesh Bhutekar, A. Kala, Kapil Waghwani, Apoorva Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/954314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables analysed were age, sex, cause of injury, pretreatment occlusion, treatment given, period of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), and posttreatment occlusion. Results. Out of 388 mandibular fractures treated, ramus fractures were 12 (3.09%). In the present study, predominant cause of mandibular ramus fracture was road traffic accident (RTA) n = 07 (58.33%) followed by fall n = 04 (33.33%) and assault n = 1 (8.33%). The average age was 35.9 years with a male predilection. Of these, 9 patients were treated with ORIF while remaining 3 with closed treatment. The average MMF after closed treatment was 21 days and 3 to 5 days after ORIF. There was improvement in occlusion in all 12 patients posttreatment with no major complication except for reduced mouth opening in cases treated with ORIF which recovered with physiotherapy and muscle relaxants. Conclusion. Mandibular ramus fractures accounted for 3.09% with RTA as a common aetiology. ORIF of ramus fractures facilitated adequate functional and anatomic reduction with early return of function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/954314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/954314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
的目标。本研究旨在举例说明发生率和病因,并分析开放复位内固定(ORIF)治疗下颌支骨折的效果。患者和方法。在本次对下颌骨折患者的回顾性分析中,分析的变量包括年龄、性别、损伤原因、预处理咬合、治疗方法、上颌-下颌固定(MMF)时间和治疗后咬合。结果。治疗的388例下颌骨骨折中,支骨折12例(3.09%)。在本研究中,导致下颌支骨折的主要原因是道路交通事故(RTA) n = 07(58.33%),其次是跌倒n = 04(33.33%)和殴打n = 1(8.33%)。平均年龄为35.9岁,以男性为主。其中9例患者接受ORIF治疗,其余3例患者接受封闭治疗。封闭治疗后平均MMF为21天,ORIF后平均MMF为3 ~ 5天。所有12例患者治疗后咬合均有改善,除经ORIF治疗的患者经物理治疗和肌肉松弛剂恢复后开口减小外,无主要并发症。结论。下颌支骨折占3.09%,RTA是常见的病因。支骨折的ORIF促进了足够的功能和解剖复位和早期功能恢复。
Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite
Aim. The present study aims at exemplifying the incidence, and aetiology and analyses the outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) over closed treatment of mandibular ramus fractures. Patients and Method. In the present retrospective analysis of mandibular fracture patients, variables analysed were age, sex, cause of injury, pretreatment occlusion, treatment given, period of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), and posttreatment occlusion. Results. Out of 388 mandibular fractures treated, ramus fractures were 12 (3.09%). In the present study, predominant cause of mandibular ramus fracture was road traffic accident (RTA) n = 07 (58.33%) followed by fall n = 04 (33.33%) and assault n = 1 (8.33%). The average age was 35.9 years with a male predilection. Of these, 9 patients were treated with ORIF while remaining 3 with closed treatment. The average MMF after closed treatment was 21 days and 3 to 5 days after ORIF. There was improvement in occlusion in all 12 patients posttreatment with no major complication except for reduced mouth opening in cases treated with ORIF which recovered with physiotherapy and muscle relaxants. Conclusion. Mandibular ramus fractures accounted for 3.09% with RTA as a common aetiology. ORIF of ramus fractures facilitated adequate functional and anatomic reduction with early return of function.