澳大利亚有额外需求儿童早期教育项目的数据实践

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Y. Kishida, M. Carter, Coral Kemp
{"title":"澳大利亚有额外需求儿童早期教育项目的数据实践","authors":"Y. Kishida, M. Carter, Coral Kemp","doi":"10.1017/jsi.2020.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although the use of data is important for informing inclusive practice, research into Australian early childhood educators’ data practice is limited. Types of data collected in early childhood settings and the use of these data were investigated. Surveys completed by 105 early childhood educators across Australia indicated that anecdotal written records, photos, and children’s work samples were the predominant data collection strategies used for both children with and without additional needs. More educators reported that they collected counted or timed behaviour data for children with additional needs than for those without additional needs. One third of educators did not indicate that they collect this type of data. The majority of educators indicated that they value the use of data in their practice, reported that they use data for progress monitoring and modification of activities to meet the needs of individuals with additional needs, and perceived that they were confident in using the data collection strategies that they nominated. The data that these Australian early childhood educators used were predominantly qualitative, suggesting that training is needed for educators to collect and utilise both qualitative and quantitative data to assist with instructional decision-making.","PeriodicalId":53789,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","volume":"26 1","pages":"34 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data Practices in Australian Early Childhood Programs for Children With Additional Needs\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kishida, M. Carter, Coral Kemp\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jsi.2020.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although the use of data is important for informing inclusive practice, research into Australian early childhood educators’ data practice is limited. Types of data collected in early childhood settings and the use of these data were investigated. Surveys completed by 105 early childhood educators across Australia indicated that anecdotal written records, photos, and children’s work samples were the predominant data collection strategies used for both children with and without additional needs. More educators reported that they collected counted or timed behaviour data for children with additional needs than for those without additional needs. One third of educators did not indicate that they collect this type of data. The majority of educators indicated that they value the use of data in their practice, reported that they use data for progress monitoring and modification of activities to meet the needs of individuals with additional needs, and perceived that they were confident in using the data collection strategies that they nominated. The data that these Australian early childhood educators used were predominantly qualitative, suggesting that training is needed for educators to collect and utilise both qualitative and quantitative data to assist with instructional decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2020.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2020.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然数据的使用对包容性实践的信息提供很重要,但对澳大利亚幼儿教育工作者数据实践的研究是有限的。调查了在儿童早期环境中收集的数据类型以及这些数据的使用情况。澳大利亚105名幼儿教育工作者完成的调查表明,轶事书面记录、照片和儿童工作样本是主要的数据收集策略,用于有或没有额外需求的儿童。与没有额外需要的儿童相比,更多的教育工作者报告说,他们为有额外需要的儿童收集了统计或定时的行为数据。三分之一的教育工作者没有表明他们收集了这类数据。大多数教育工作者表示,他们重视在实践中使用数据,报告说,他们使用数据来监测进度和修改活动,以满足有额外需求的个人的需要,并认为他们有信心使用他们提名的数据收集策略。这些澳大利亚幼儿教育工作者使用的数据主要是定性的,这表明需要对教育工作者进行培训,以收集和利用定性和定量数据来协助教学决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data Practices in Australian Early Childhood Programs for Children With Additional Needs
Abstract Although the use of data is important for informing inclusive practice, research into Australian early childhood educators’ data practice is limited. Types of data collected in early childhood settings and the use of these data were investigated. Surveys completed by 105 early childhood educators across Australia indicated that anecdotal written records, photos, and children’s work samples were the predominant data collection strategies used for both children with and without additional needs. More educators reported that they collected counted or timed behaviour data for children with additional needs than for those without additional needs. One third of educators did not indicate that they collect this type of data. The majority of educators indicated that they value the use of data in their practice, reported that they use data for progress monitoring and modification of activities to meet the needs of individuals with additional needs, and perceived that they were confident in using the data collection strategies that they nominated. The data that these Australian early childhood educators used were predominantly qualitative, suggesting that training is needed for educators to collect and utilise both qualitative and quantitative data to assist with instructional decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信