{"title":"“它不是谴责,因为它看起来很神秘”:洛普对十四行诗《基本品质抵抗》的评论","authors":"Gary Brown","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“No es de condenar porque parezca enigmático”: Lope’s commentary on the sonnet ‘La calidad elementar resiste’\",\"authors\":\"Gary Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:洛普的十四行诗《基本抵抗》及其发表在《Circe》上的自我评论传统上被认为是对他的工歌主义批评者的迂腐的反驳。但是,这首十四行诗对洛佩的重要性,从它在三个不同场合的出版中可以看出,这首十四行诗和它的评论不仅仅是为了反对贡贡主义的流行而摆出的姿态,这就要求人们重新阅读这首十四行诗和它的评论。对Lope注释内容的进一步分析指出,在新柏拉图主义的语言中隐藏着一种个人的、心理的、情欲的利害关系,以及潜在的经院哲学的爱情和爱欲概念,不仅依赖于Pico della Mirandola的七重加,更重要的是依赖于伪狄奥尼修斯和菲西诺对柏拉图的翻译。
“No es de condenar porque parezca enigmático”: Lope’s commentary on the sonnet ‘La calidad elementar resiste’
SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.