“它不是谴责,因为它看起来很神秘”:洛普对十四行诗《基本品质抵抗》的评论

IF 0.3 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Gary Brown
{"title":"“它不是谴责,因为它看起来很神秘”:洛普对十四行诗《基本品质抵抗》的评论","authors":"Gary Brown","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“No es de condenar porque parezca enigmático”: Lope’s commentary on the sonnet ‘La calidad elementar resiste’\",\"authors\":\"Gary Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.18.3.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:洛普的十四行诗《基本抵抗》及其发表在《Circe》上的自我评论传统上被认为是对他的工歌主义批评者的迂腐的反驳。但是,这首十四行诗对洛佩的重要性,从它在三个不同场合的出版中可以看出,这首十四行诗和它的评论不仅仅是为了反对贡贡主义的流行而摆出的姿态,这就要求人们重新阅读这首十四行诗和它的评论。对Lope注释内容的进一步分析指出,在新柏拉图主义的语言中隐藏着一种个人的、心理的、情欲的利害关系,以及潜在的经院哲学的爱情和爱欲概念,不仅依赖于Pico della Mirandola的七重加,更重要的是依赖于伪狄奥尼修斯和菲西诺对柏拉图的翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“No es de condenar porque parezca enigmático”: Lope’s commentary on the sonnet ‘La calidad elementar resiste’
SUMMARY: Lope’s sonnet La calidad elementar resiste and its self-commentary published in La Circe has traditionally been conceived as a pedantic rejoinder to his gongorist critics. But the importance of the sonnet for Lope, witnessed by its publication on three separate occasions, invites a re-reading of the sonnet and its commentary as more than mere posturing against the vogue of gongorism. A closer analysis of the content of Lope’s commentary points to a personal, pyscho-erotic stake veiled in the language of Neoplatonism and the underlying scholastistic conceptions of amor and eros, relying not only on the Heptaplus of Pico della Mirandola but more significantly on Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Ficino’s translations of Plato.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信