{"title":"俄国对“历史上的耶稣”的追求:托尔斯泰、陀思妥耶夫斯基与施特劳斯","authors":"Protoiereus Georgy Orekhanov, Iereus Alexey Andreev","doi":"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The works of theologian David Friedrich Strauss are significant milestones in the development of an academic project known as the “Quest for the Historical Jesus”. As part of the Quest, various researchers tried to reconstruct the life, teachings, and personality of Jesus of Nazareth using historical and philological methods, that is, operating from the standpoint of strict positivism. The purpose of this article is to show that the works of Strauss had a significant impact on the logic and evolution of the religious quests of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky. Tolstoy became acquainted with Strauss's ideas around the late 1870s, in a period of intensive intellectual search, which eventually led him to an acute religious crisis and rejection of the official church view on Christianity. The article shows that the writer was ultimately compelled to reject the ideas of Strauss and Renan. At the same time, some elements of Strauss's theory were so close to Tolstoy that these ideas had a definite influence on his basic religious conception. Dostoevsky had the opportunity to become acquainted with the ideas of Strauss in the Petrashevsky Circle. This experience led to a deep life crisis on Dostoevsky's part, too. On the one hand, the writer had a negative view of ideas associated with the works of Strauss and Renan. On the other hand, all of Dostoevsky’s artistic work is directly related to his overcoming the influence of the “Strauss-Renan narrative”, which itself is evidence of the evolution of the writer’s views on faith and religion. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9","PeriodicalId":42189,"journal":{"name":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"261-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia’s Quest for the “Historical Jesus”: Tolstoy and Dostoevsky vs. Strauss\",\"authors\":\"Protoiereus Georgy Orekhanov, Iereus Alexey Andreev\",\"doi\":\"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The works of theologian David Friedrich Strauss are significant milestones in the development of an academic project known as the “Quest for the Historical Jesus”. As part of the Quest, various researchers tried to reconstruct the life, teachings, and personality of Jesus of Nazareth using historical and philological methods, that is, operating from the standpoint of strict positivism. The purpose of this article is to show that the works of Strauss had a significant impact on the logic and evolution of the religious quests of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky. Tolstoy became acquainted with Strauss's ideas around the late 1870s, in a period of intensive intellectual search, which eventually led him to an acute religious crisis and rejection of the official church view on Christianity. The article shows that the writer was ultimately compelled to reject the ideas of Strauss and Renan. At the same time, some elements of Strauss's theory were so close to Tolstoy that these ideas had a definite influence on his basic religious conception. Dostoevsky had the opportunity to become acquainted with the ideas of Strauss in the Petrashevsky Circle. This experience led to a deep life crisis on Dostoevsky's part, too. On the one hand, the writer had a negative view of ideas associated with the works of Strauss and Renan. On the other hand, all of Dostoevsky’s artistic work is directly related to his overcoming the influence of the “Strauss-Renan narrative”, which itself is evidence of the evolution of the writer’s views on faith and religion. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9\",\"PeriodicalId\":42189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"261-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
神学家大卫·弗里德里希·施特劳斯(David Friedrich Strauss)的作品是一个学术项目发展的重要里程碑,该项目被称为“寻找历史上的耶稣”。作为探索的一部分,各种研究人员试图用历史和语言学的方法重建拿撒勒人耶稣的生活、教义和个性,也就是说,从严格的实证主义的立场出发。本文的目的是表明施特劳斯的作品对列夫·托尔斯泰和陀思妥耶夫斯基的宗教追求的逻辑和演变产生了重大影响。托尔斯泰在19世纪70年代后期开始熟悉施特劳斯的思想,这段时间他进行了密集的智力探索,最终导致他陷入了严重的宗教危机,并拒绝了官方教会对基督教的看法。文章表明,作者最终被迫拒绝了施特劳斯和勒南的思想。同时,施特劳斯的一些理论元素与托尔斯泰非常接近,这些思想对他的基本宗教观念产生了一定的影响。陀思妥耶夫斯基有机会在彼得拉舍夫斯基圈子里了解施特劳斯的思想。这一经历也给陀思妥耶夫斯基带来了深刻的人生危机。一方面,作者对施特劳斯和勒南的作品持否定态度。另一方面,陀思妥耶夫斯基的所有艺术作品都与他克服“斯特劳斯-卡恩叙事”的影响直接相关,这本身就是作家信仰和宗教观演变的证据。2305 - 6754.2020.9.1.9 DOI: 10.31168 /
Russia’s Quest for the “Historical Jesus”: Tolstoy and Dostoevsky vs. Strauss
The works of theologian David Friedrich Strauss are significant milestones in the development of an academic project known as the “Quest for the Historical Jesus”. As part of the Quest, various researchers tried to reconstruct the life, teachings, and personality of Jesus of Nazareth using historical and philological methods, that is, operating from the standpoint of strict positivism. The purpose of this article is to show that the works of Strauss had a significant impact on the logic and evolution of the religious quests of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky. Tolstoy became acquainted with Strauss's ideas around the late 1870s, in a period of intensive intellectual search, which eventually led him to an acute religious crisis and rejection of the official church view on Christianity. The article shows that the writer was ultimately compelled to reject the ideas of Strauss and Renan. At the same time, some elements of Strauss's theory were so close to Tolstoy that these ideas had a definite influence on his basic religious conception. Dostoevsky had the opportunity to become acquainted with the ideas of Strauss in the Petrashevsky Circle. This experience led to a deep life crisis on Dostoevsky's part, too. On the one hand, the writer had a negative view of ideas associated with the works of Strauss and Renan. On the other hand, all of Dostoevsky’s artistic work is directly related to his overcoming the influence of the “Strauss-Renan narrative”, which itself is evidence of the evolution of the writer’s views on faith and religion. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9
期刊介绍:
The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is a periodical focusing on the fields of the arts and humanities. In accordance with the standards of humanities periodicals aimed at the development of national philological traditions in a broad cultural and academic context, the Journal Slověne = Словѣне is multilingual but with a focus on papers in English. The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is intended for the exchange of information between Russian scholars and leading universities and research centers throughout the world and for their further professional integration into the international academic community through a shared focus on Slavic studies. The target audience of the journal is Slavic philologists and scholars in related disciplines (historians, cultural anthropologists, sociologists, specialists in comparative and religious studies, etc.) and related fields (Byzantinists, Germanists, Hebraists, Turkologists, Finno-Ugrists, etc.). The periodical has a pronounced interdisciplinary character and publishes papers from the widest linguistic, philological, and historico-cultural range: there are studies of linguistic typology, pragmalinguistics, computer and applied linguistics, etymology, onomastics, epigraphy, ethnolinguistics, dialectology, folkloristics, Biblical studies, history of science, palaeoslavistics, history of Slavic literatures, Slavs in the context of foreign languages, non-Slavic languages and dialects in the Slavic context, and historical linguistics.