十年级学生对多米诺骨牌、蛇和梯子媒介对运动概念理解的比较

Hermansyah, F. Yahya, Wahyuningtyas Indah, W. Astuti, I. M. Sentaya, Gusti Made Sulindra
{"title":"十年级学生对多米诺骨牌、蛇和梯子媒介对运动概念理解的比较","authors":"Hermansyah, F. Yahya, Wahyuningtyas Indah, W. Astuti, I. M. Sentaya, Gusti Made Sulindra","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v9i1.4978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physics learning should be student center. Students used as learning centers impact their understanding of the material or concepts being taught. However, students do not get to learn like that. It impacts students’ low level of understanding of physics concepts, especially the concept of motion. An alternative solution to this is using dominoes and ladders in physics learning. This study examines the effect of using two learning media (dominos and ladder snakes) on the understanding of physics concepts of class X students at MAN 1 Sumbawa. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a posttest-only design. The research sample was obtained using a purposive sampling technique. The number of research respondents was 138 students, who were divided into two experimental groups. Experimental Group 1 used domino media, and Experimental Group 2 used snakes and ladders media. The data collection instrument used was a concept understanding test in the form of filling in and multiple choice given after the treatment was given. The results showed that the domino group better understood the concept than the snakes and ladders group. The parametric prerequisite test shows that the students’ conceptual comprehension data is homogeneous and not normally distributed. The hypothesis test results show that the data’s significance value is less than 0.05. It can be concluded that there are significant differences in understanding the concept of motion between the domino group and the snakes and ladders group. Applying the domino game in physics learning is better than the snakes and ladders game in maximizing the students’ understanding of the concept of motion in MAN 1 Sumbawa.","PeriodicalId":34735,"journal":{"name":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Tenth-Grade Students’ Understanding Concept of Motion Between Domino and Snake and Ladders Media\",\"authors\":\"Hermansyah, F. Yahya, Wahyuningtyas Indah, W. Astuti, I. M. Sentaya, Gusti Made Sulindra\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jpft.v9i1.4978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physics learning should be student center. Students used as learning centers impact their understanding of the material or concepts being taught. However, students do not get to learn like that. It impacts students’ low level of understanding of physics concepts, especially the concept of motion. An alternative solution to this is using dominoes and ladders in physics learning. This study examines the effect of using two learning media (dominos and ladder snakes) on the understanding of physics concepts of class X students at MAN 1 Sumbawa. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a posttest-only design. The research sample was obtained using a purposive sampling technique. The number of research respondents was 138 students, who were divided into two experimental groups. Experimental Group 1 used domino media, and Experimental Group 2 used snakes and ladders media. The data collection instrument used was a concept understanding test in the form of filling in and multiple choice given after the treatment was given. The results showed that the domino group better understood the concept than the snakes and ladders group. The parametric prerequisite test shows that the students’ conceptual comprehension data is homogeneous and not normally distributed. The hypothesis test results show that the data’s significance value is less than 0.05. It can be concluded that there are significant differences in understanding the concept of motion between the domino group and the snakes and ladders group. Applying the domino game in physics learning is better than the snakes and ladders game in maximizing the students’ understanding of the concept of motion in MAN 1 Sumbawa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i1.4978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i1.4978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理学习应该以学生为中心。作为学习中心的学生会影响他们对所教材料或概念的理解。然而,学生们不能这样学习。它影响了学生对物理概念,特别是运动概念的低水平理解。另一个解决方案是在物理学习中使用多米诺骨牌和梯子。本研究考察了使用两种学习媒介(多米诺骨牌和阶梯蛇)对松巴瓦曼一小学X班学生物理概念理解的影响。这种类型的研究是准实验的,只有后测试的设计。研究样本是采用有目的抽样技术获得的。调查对象为138名学生,他们被分为两个实验组。实验1组采用多米诺骨牌培养基,实验2组采用蛇梯培养基。数据收集工具为概念理解测试,在治疗结束后进行填空和多项选择。结果表明,多米诺骨牌组比蛇梯组更能理解概念。参数前提检验表明,学生的概念理解数据是同质的,不是正态分布的。假设检验结果表明,数据的显著性值小于0.05。可以得出结论,骨牌组和蛇梯组对运动概念的理解存在显著差异。在物理学习中运用多米诺骨牌游戏比蛇梯游戏更能使学生最大限度地理解《MAN 1松巴哇》中的运动概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Tenth-Grade Students’ Understanding Concept of Motion Between Domino and Snake and Ladders Media
Physics learning should be student center. Students used as learning centers impact their understanding of the material or concepts being taught. However, students do not get to learn like that. It impacts students’ low level of understanding of physics concepts, especially the concept of motion. An alternative solution to this is using dominoes and ladders in physics learning. This study examines the effect of using two learning media (dominos and ladder snakes) on the understanding of physics concepts of class X students at MAN 1 Sumbawa. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a posttest-only design. The research sample was obtained using a purposive sampling technique. The number of research respondents was 138 students, who were divided into two experimental groups. Experimental Group 1 used domino media, and Experimental Group 2 used snakes and ladders media. The data collection instrument used was a concept understanding test in the form of filling in and multiple choice given after the treatment was given. The results showed that the domino group better understood the concept than the snakes and ladders group. The parametric prerequisite test shows that the students’ conceptual comprehension data is homogeneous and not normally distributed. The hypothesis test results show that the data’s significance value is less than 0.05. It can be concluded that there are significant differences in understanding the concept of motion between the domino group and the snakes and ladders group. Applying the domino game in physics learning is better than the snakes and ladders game in maximizing the students’ understanding of the concept of motion in MAN 1 Sumbawa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信