学生对通过全文数据库找到的期刊文章百分比的看法(和现实)

Robert A Bartsch, Bridgette L Tydlacka
{"title":"学生对通过全文数据库找到的期刊文章百分比的看法(和现实)","authors":"Robert A Bartsch,&nbsp;Bridgette L Tydlacka","doi":"10.1016/j.resstr.2004.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers [Coll. Res. Libr. 63 (2002) 515] have theorized that content and functionality affect whether people choose to retrieve journal articles from full-text electronic databases or from print copies. Full-text databases are often rated higher in functionality (i.e., convenience). This article examines why students may also believe that full-text databases have superior content. In addition, psychology students were asked what percentage of relevant psychology articles was available online and in print at their library and a neighboring institution. Students greatly overestimated how many articles were available online. The paper further discusses when students will exclusively choose full-text databases and what librarians can do to help combat the problem of exclusively using full-text databases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101076,"journal":{"name":"Research Strategies","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resstr.2004.03.002","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student perceptions (and the reality) of percentage of journal articles found through full-text databases\",\"authors\":\"Robert A Bartsch,&nbsp;Bridgette L Tydlacka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resstr.2004.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Researchers [Coll. Res. Libr. 63 (2002) 515] have theorized that content and functionality affect whether people choose to retrieve journal articles from full-text electronic databases or from print copies. Full-text databases are often rated higher in functionality (i.e., convenience). This article examines why students may also believe that full-text databases have superior content. In addition, psychology students were asked what percentage of relevant psychology articles was available online and in print at their library and a neighboring institution. Students greatly overestimated how many articles were available online. The paper further discusses when students will exclusively choose full-text databases and what librarians can do to help combat the problem of exclusively using full-text databases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Strategies\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 128-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resstr.2004.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Strategies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734331004000175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734331004000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

研究人员(科尔。Res. Libr. 63(2002) 515]从理论上认为,内容和功能影响人们是选择从全文电子数据库检索期刊文章还是从印刷版检索期刊文章。全文数据库通常在功能(即便利性)方面得到较高的评价。这篇文章探讨了为什么学生也会相信全文数据库有更好的内容。此外,研究人员还询问了心理学专业的学生,他们所在图书馆和邻近机构的在线和印刷的相关心理学文章占比是多少。学生们大大高估了网上可用文章的数量。本文进一步讨论了学生何时会完全选择全文数据库,以及图书馆员可以做些什么来帮助解决完全使用全文数据库的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student perceptions (and the reality) of percentage of journal articles found through full-text databases

Researchers [Coll. Res. Libr. 63 (2002) 515] have theorized that content and functionality affect whether people choose to retrieve journal articles from full-text electronic databases or from print copies. Full-text databases are often rated higher in functionality (i.e., convenience). This article examines why students may also believe that full-text databases have superior content. In addition, psychology students were asked what percentage of relevant psychology articles was available online and in print at their library and a neighboring institution. Students greatly overestimated how many articles were available online. The paper further discusses when students will exclusively choose full-text databases and what librarians can do to help combat the problem of exclusively using full-text databases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信