还是那个缺席的朋友吗?欧盟在20年后的全球反恐角色

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Alex Mackenzie, C. Kaunert
{"title":"还是那个缺席的朋友吗?欧盟在20年后的全球反恐角色","authors":"Alex Mackenzie, C. Kaunert","doi":"10.1080/23340460.2021.1998920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over a decade ago, it was claimed that the EU was an “absent friend” in foreign policy counter-terrorism. Much has changed since then, however. Al Qaeda and Islamic State are shadows of what they were. The contribution of this article is to re-evaluate and offer a theoretically-informed account of the development of the EU’s global counter-terrorism role, drawing on collective securitisation. We advance two arguments here. Firstly, EU global counter-terrorism activity has occurred, grown, and become routinised due to terrorist threats and attacks, institutional developments, and interactions with interlocutors. Secondly, the characterisation of the EU as an “absent friend” is unsustainable in 2021. While the EU remains secondary to its member states in many ways, it has developed tools of its own that have enhanced its capabilities in external counter-terrorism.","PeriodicalId":36949,"journal":{"name":"Russia in Global Affairs","volume":"12 1","pages":"615 - 630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Still the absent friend? The European Union’s global counter-terrorism role after twenty years\",\"authors\":\"Alex Mackenzie, C. Kaunert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23340460.2021.1998920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over a decade ago, it was claimed that the EU was an “absent friend” in foreign policy counter-terrorism. Much has changed since then, however. Al Qaeda and Islamic State are shadows of what they were. The contribution of this article is to re-evaluate and offer a theoretically-informed account of the development of the EU’s global counter-terrorism role, drawing on collective securitisation. We advance two arguments here. Firstly, EU global counter-terrorism activity has occurred, grown, and become routinised due to terrorist threats and attacks, institutional developments, and interactions with interlocutors. Secondly, the characterisation of the EU as an “absent friend” is unsustainable in 2021. While the EU remains secondary to its member states in many ways, it has developed tools of its own that have enhanced its capabilities in external counter-terrorism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russia in Global Affairs\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"615 - 630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russia in Global Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1998920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia in Global Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1998920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

十多年前,人们声称欧盟在外交反恐政策上是一个“缺席的朋友”。然而,自那以后,情况发生了很大变化。基地组织和伊斯兰国只是他们过去的影子。本文的贡献在于重新评估欧盟全球反恐角色的发展,并借鉴集体证券化的理论知识。我们在此提出两个论点。首先,由于恐怖主义威胁和袭击、制度发展以及与对话者的互动,欧盟的全球反恐活动已经发生、发展并变得常规化。其次,在2021年,将欧盟定性为“缺席的朋友”是不可持续的。虽然欧盟在许多方面仍然次于其成员国,但它已经开发了自己的工具,增强了其对外反恐的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Still the absent friend? The European Union’s global counter-terrorism role after twenty years
ABSTRACT Over a decade ago, it was claimed that the EU was an “absent friend” in foreign policy counter-terrorism. Much has changed since then, however. Al Qaeda and Islamic State are shadows of what they were. The contribution of this article is to re-evaluate and offer a theoretically-informed account of the development of the EU’s global counter-terrorism role, drawing on collective securitisation. We advance two arguments here. Firstly, EU global counter-terrorism activity has occurred, grown, and become routinised due to terrorist threats and attacks, institutional developments, and interactions with interlocutors. Secondly, the characterisation of the EU as an “absent friend” is unsustainable in 2021. While the EU remains secondary to its member states in many ways, it has developed tools of its own that have enhanced its capabilities in external counter-terrorism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russia in Global Affairs
Russia in Global Affairs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信