{"title":"近代早期英国思想史中的语境不确定性:过去关系、历史性、语言和概念领域","authors":"Conal Condren","doi":"10.1353/pgn.2023.a905414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses contextualisation in early modern, mainly English intellectual history, from which ‘Cambridge contextualist’ history arose. It argues that contextualisation is a ubiquitous aspect of understanding and that historical contexts are unstable historiographical necessities, not features of history. It explores the issues most with reference to J. G. A. Pocock’s notions of ‘past-relationships’ in tension with a sense of historicity, and the ‘languages’ he considers fundamental to intellectual history. The former provides a valuable analytic vocabulary in and beyond the early modern; the latter are problematic. Discussion of the difficulties leads directly a critique of a conceptual realm as a necessary context for intellectual history.","PeriodicalId":43576,"journal":{"name":"PARERGON","volume":"81 1","pages":"51 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Essay on Contextual Indeterminacy in Early Modern English Intellectual History: Past-Relationships, Historicity, Languages, and the Conceptual Realm\",\"authors\":\"Conal Condren\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pgn.2023.a905414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article discusses contextualisation in early modern, mainly English intellectual history, from which ‘Cambridge contextualist’ history arose. It argues that contextualisation is a ubiquitous aspect of understanding and that historical contexts are unstable historiographical necessities, not features of history. It explores the issues most with reference to J. G. A. Pocock’s notions of ‘past-relationships’ in tension with a sense of historicity, and the ‘languages’ he considers fundamental to intellectual history. The former provides a valuable analytic vocabulary in and beyond the early modern; the latter are problematic. Discussion of the difficulties leads directly a critique of a conceptual realm as a necessary context for intellectual history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PARERGON\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PARERGON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2023.a905414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PARERGON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2023.a905414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文讨论了近代早期语境化,主要是英国思想史,由此产生了“剑桥语境主义”史。它认为语境化是理解的一个无处不在的方面,历史语境是不稳定的史学必然性,而不是历史的特征。这本书主要探讨了j·g·a·波科克(J. G. a . Pocock)关于“过去关系”的概念,这种关系与历史感是紧张的,他认为“语言”是思想史的基础。前者提供了早期现代及以后的有价值的分析词汇;后者是有问题的。对这些困难的讨论直接导致了对作为思想史必要背景的概念领域的批判。
An Essay on Contextual Indeterminacy in Early Modern English Intellectual History: Past-Relationships, Historicity, Languages, and the Conceptual Realm
Abstract:This article discusses contextualisation in early modern, mainly English intellectual history, from which ‘Cambridge contextualist’ history arose. It argues that contextualisation is a ubiquitous aspect of understanding and that historical contexts are unstable historiographical necessities, not features of history. It explores the issues most with reference to J. G. A. Pocock’s notions of ‘past-relationships’ in tension with a sense of historicity, and the ‘languages’ he considers fundamental to intellectual history. The former provides a valuable analytic vocabulary in and beyond the early modern; the latter are problematic. Discussion of the difficulties leads directly a critique of a conceptual realm as a necessary context for intellectual history.
期刊介绍:
Parergon publishes articles and book reviews on all aspects of medieval and early modern studies. It has a particular focus on research which takes new approaches and crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries. Fully refereed and with an international Advisory Board, Parergon is the Southern Hemisphere"s leading journal for early European research. It is published by the Australian and New Zealand Association of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (Inc.) and has close links with the ARC Network for Early European Research.