学术会议作为学习场所:博士生观点与制度政策的跨国比较

Q2 Social Sciences
Omolabake Fakunle, Mollie Dollinger, Joyceline Alla-Mensah, Blair Izard
{"title":"学术会议作为学习场所:博士生观点与制度政策的跨国比较","authors":"Omolabake Fakunle, Mollie Dollinger, Joyceline Alla-Mensah, Blair Izard","doi":"10.28945/4383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore trends and motivations for doctoral students’ participation in domestic and international conferences. We draw on doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences from four contexts (USA, Scotland, England, Australia) to further explore variations across different global contexts.\n\nBackground: There is increased recognition of the importance of conferences within doctoral education. Yet very little is known or understood about doctoral students’ participation and motivations for participating in conferences. \n\nMethodology: Our sample includes doctoral students from four institutions studying in a School of Education. We used an online survey and follow-up focus group interviews to investigate doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences of conferences.\n\nContribution: There are few studies on doctoral students’ participation in conferences. This study contributes to the literature on doctoral students as it investigates the trends and rationale for doctoral students’ participation in national and international conferences. We highlight the importance of conferences as learning sites for doctoral students. Furthermore, our research highlights dissimilarities and ambiguities in the provision of support for doctoral students’ regarding what we describe as the social aspect of their researcher learning and development, in this case, in networking activities.\n\nFindings: Our findings show that a) at both the individual (doctoral students) and institutional level, there is an implicit understanding of the importance of networking and yet programs rarely formally require conference attendance; b) students’ motivations to attend conferences may be mediated by their career aspirations and supportive structures (i.e., funding); and c) conferences support doctoral students’ learning and confidence in future networking.\n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: Our recommendations to doctoral education training programs and/or supervisors are to explicitly discuss and promote networking and/or conference attendance, and to find ways to support students to engage in networking outside their immediate study environment. \n\nRecommendation for Researchers: Our recommendation to researchers is to further investigate the importance of networking behaviors and experiences on doctoral student training and/or career outcomes. \n\nImpact on Society: This research highlights the importance of recognizing the learning needs of doctoral students who are expected to work in a complex, globally connected society as part of the reality of higher education in the 21st century. \n\nFuture Research: Results from the study could help inform a larger study on the trends and motivations of doctoral students’ networking across all disciplines.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Conferences as Learning Sites: A Multinational Comparison of Doctoral Students’ Perspectives and Institutional Policy\",\"authors\":\"Omolabake Fakunle, Mollie Dollinger, Joyceline Alla-Mensah, Blair Izard\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/4383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim/Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore trends and motivations for doctoral students’ participation in domestic and international conferences. We draw on doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences from four contexts (USA, Scotland, England, Australia) to further explore variations across different global contexts.\\n\\nBackground: There is increased recognition of the importance of conferences within doctoral education. Yet very little is known or understood about doctoral students’ participation and motivations for participating in conferences. \\n\\nMethodology: Our sample includes doctoral students from four institutions studying in a School of Education. We used an online survey and follow-up focus group interviews to investigate doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences of conferences.\\n\\nContribution: There are few studies on doctoral students’ participation in conferences. This study contributes to the literature on doctoral students as it investigates the trends and rationale for doctoral students’ participation in national and international conferences. We highlight the importance of conferences as learning sites for doctoral students. Furthermore, our research highlights dissimilarities and ambiguities in the provision of support for doctoral students’ regarding what we describe as the social aspect of their researcher learning and development, in this case, in networking activities.\\n\\nFindings: Our findings show that a) at both the individual (doctoral students) and institutional level, there is an implicit understanding of the importance of networking and yet programs rarely formally require conference attendance; b) students’ motivations to attend conferences may be mediated by their career aspirations and supportive structures (i.e., funding); and c) conferences support doctoral students’ learning and confidence in future networking.\\n\\nRecommendations for Practitioners: Our recommendations to doctoral education training programs and/or supervisors are to explicitly discuss and promote networking and/or conference attendance, and to find ways to support students to engage in networking outside their immediate study environment. \\n\\nRecommendation for Researchers: Our recommendation to researchers is to further investigate the importance of networking behaviors and experiences on doctoral student training and/or career outcomes. \\n\\nImpact on Society: This research highlights the importance of recognizing the learning needs of doctoral students who are expected to work in a complex, globally connected society as part of the reality of higher education in the 21st century. \\n\\nFuture Research: Results from the study could help inform a larger study on the trends and motivations of doctoral students’ networking across all disciplines.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Doctoral Studies\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Doctoral Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/4383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:本文旨在探讨博士生参加国内外会议的趋势和动机。我们利用来自四个国家(美国、苏格兰、英格兰、澳大利亚)的博士生的看法和经验,进一步探索不同全球背景下的差异。背景:人们越来越认识到会议在博士教育中的重要性。然而,人们对博士生的参与和参加会议的动机知之甚少。方法:我们的样本包括来自四所教育学院的博士生。我们使用在线调查和后续焦点小组访谈来调查博士生对会议的看法和经历。贡献:关于博士生参加会议的研究较少。本研究对博士生参加国内和国际会议的趋势和理由进行了调查,对博士生的文献有贡献。我们强调会议作为博士生学习场所的重要性。此外,我们的研究强调了在为博士生提供支持方面的差异和模糊性,我们将其描述为研究人员学习和发展的社会方面,在这种情况下,是在网络活动中。我们的研究结果表明:a)在个人(博士生)和机构层面,对网络的重要性有一种隐含的理解,但项目很少正式要求参加会议;B)学生参加会议的动机可能受到他们的职业抱负和支持结构(即资金)的调节;c)会议支持博士生的学习和对未来网络的信心。对从业者的建议:我们对博士教育培训计划和/或导师的建议是明确讨论和促进网络和/或会议出席,并找到支持学生在其直接学习环境之外参与网络的方法。对研究人员的建议:我们对研究人员的建议是进一步调查网络行为和经验对博士生培训和/或职业成果的重要性。对社会的影响:这项研究强调了认识到博士生学习需求的重要性,博士生将在一个复杂的、全球联系的社会中工作,这是21世纪高等教育现实的一部分。未来研究:这项研究的结果可以帮助开展一项更大规模的研究,研究博士生在所有学科之间建立网络的趋势和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic Conferences as Learning Sites: A Multinational Comparison of Doctoral Students’ Perspectives and Institutional Policy
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore trends and motivations for doctoral students’ participation in domestic and international conferences. We draw on doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences from four contexts (USA, Scotland, England, Australia) to further explore variations across different global contexts. Background: There is increased recognition of the importance of conferences within doctoral education. Yet very little is known or understood about doctoral students’ participation and motivations for participating in conferences. Methodology: Our sample includes doctoral students from four institutions studying in a School of Education. We used an online survey and follow-up focus group interviews to investigate doctoral students’ perceptions and experiences of conferences. Contribution: There are few studies on doctoral students’ participation in conferences. This study contributes to the literature on doctoral students as it investigates the trends and rationale for doctoral students’ participation in national and international conferences. We highlight the importance of conferences as learning sites for doctoral students. Furthermore, our research highlights dissimilarities and ambiguities in the provision of support for doctoral students’ regarding what we describe as the social aspect of their researcher learning and development, in this case, in networking activities. Findings: Our findings show that a) at both the individual (doctoral students) and institutional level, there is an implicit understanding of the importance of networking and yet programs rarely formally require conference attendance; b) students’ motivations to attend conferences may be mediated by their career aspirations and supportive structures (i.e., funding); and c) conferences support doctoral students’ learning and confidence in future networking. Recommendations for Practitioners: Our recommendations to doctoral education training programs and/or supervisors are to explicitly discuss and promote networking and/or conference attendance, and to find ways to support students to engage in networking outside their immediate study environment. Recommendation for Researchers: Our recommendation to researchers is to further investigate the importance of networking behaviors and experiences on doctoral student training and/or career outcomes. Impact on Society: This research highlights the importance of recognizing the learning needs of doctoral students who are expected to work in a complex, globally connected society as part of the reality of higher education in the 21st century. Future Research: Results from the study could help inform a larger study on the trends and motivations of doctoral students’ networking across all disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信