埃塞俄比亚阿法尔民族地区州Ab 'ala Woreda生骆驼奶的细菌质量评估、主要细菌病原体及处理方法

Bashir Abdifatah Mohamed, A. Farah
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚阿法尔民族地区州Ab 'ala Woreda生骆驼奶的细菌质量评估、主要细菌病原体及处理方法","authors":"Bashir Abdifatah Mohamed, A. Farah","doi":"10.20546/ijcrar.2018.610.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article Info In Ethiopia, most of the camel milk production is accounted by the traditional milk processing system and unhygienic handling that are generally poor in processing capacity, causing high product loss and risky for public consumption. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Ab’ala woreda of Afar national regional state from August to November 2017 with the objective of assessing the bacteriological quality, handling practice and major bacterial pathogens of camel milk. The study methodology employed was questionnaire survey and observational study for handling practice and bacteriological count and isolation and detection of major pathogenic bacteria from raw camel milk. Thirty (30) purposively selected camel herders were interviewed for the survey-based study of milk handling practices and forty raw milk samples were aseptically collected and tested for bacteriological load analysis and isolation of major bacteria. The overall average total bacterial count ranged from 2.3x10 to 1.65x10 cfu/ml with a mean value of 56.20x10 milk samples directly from the teat and 92.25x10cfu/ml milk samples from equipment (buckets) at farm level. Results showed very significant differences in total plate counts (P < 0.05) between the two milk collection points. The total bacterial count of the milk samples was high in buckets when compared to the samples taken from the teat directly. In this study milking system and handling practices like udder cleaning, hand washing before milking and cleaning vessels was in poor sanitary condition. No statistically significant variation was observed in coliform counts in milk samples collected from the teat compared to milk samples from the equipment used to milk camels. Meanwhile, coliform counts demonstrated a limited increase (P > 0.05) from udder (teat) to equipment (bucket) level. High coliform count in milk indicates fecal contamination of milk. Milk was produced and handled in unhygienic condition. The results of the current study indicated that the camel milk produced and handling in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality for consumption unless pasteurized. Therefore, this risk assessment study with similar different studies reported from different regions in Ethiopia might provide a basis for the establishment of national milk quality standards in Ethiopia. Accepted: 04 September 2018 Available Online: 20 October 2018","PeriodicalId":13945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Bacteriological Quality Major Bacterial Pathogens and Handling Practices of Raw Camel Milk in Ab’ala Woreda of Afar National Regional State, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Bashir Abdifatah Mohamed, A. Farah\",\"doi\":\"10.20546/ijcrar.2018.610.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article Info In Ethiopia, most of the camel milk production is accounted by the traditional milk processing system and unhygienic handling that are generally poor in processing capacity, causing high product loss and risky for public consumption. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Ab’ala woreda of Afar national regional state from August to November 2017 with the objective of assessing the bacteriological quality, handling practice and major bacterial pathogens of camel milk. The study methodology employed was questionnaire survey and observational study for handling practice and bacteriological count and isolation and detection of major pathogenic bacteria from raw camel milk. Thirty (30) purposively selected camel herders were interviewed for the survey-based study of milk handling practices and forty raw milk samples were aseptically collected and tested for bacteriological load analysis and isolation of major bacteria. The overall average total bacterial count ranged from 2.3x10 to 1.65x10 cfu/ml with a mean value of 56.20x10 milk samples directly from the teat and 92.25x10cfu/ml milk samples from equipment (buckets) at farm level. Results showed very significant differences in total plate counts (P < 0.05) between the two milk collection points. The total bacterial count of the milk samples was high in buckets when compared to the samples taken from the teat directly. In this study milking system and handling practices like udder cleaning, hand washing before milking and cleaning vessels was in poor sanitary condition. No statistically significant variation was observed in coliform counts in milk samples collected from the teat compared to milk samples from the equipment used to milk camels. Meanwhile, coliform counts demonstrated a limited increase (P > 0.05) from udder (teat) to equipment (bucket) level. High coliform count in milk indicates fecal contamination of milk. Milk was produced and handled in unhygienic condition. The results of the current study indicated that the camel milk produced and handling in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality for consumption unless pasteurized. Therefore, this risk assessment study with similar different studies reported from different regions in Ethiopia might provide a basis for the establishment of national milk quality standards in Ethiopia. Accepted: 04 September 2018 Available Online: 20 October 2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":13945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2018.610.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2018.610.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在埃塞俄比亚,大部分骆驼奶的生产是由传统的牛奶加工系统和不卫生的处理所占,这些处理能力普遍较差,造成了高的产品损失和公众消费的风险。2017年8月至11月,在阿法尔民族地区州Ab 'ala woreda进行了一项横断面研究,目的是评估骆驼奶的细菌学质量、处理方法和主要细菌病原体。本研究采用问卷调查和观察研究相结合的方法,对骆驼原料奶中主要致病菌进行细菌计数和分离检测。本研究对30名骆驼牧民进行了访谈,对他们的奶处理方式进行了调查研究,并对40份原料奶进行了无菌采集,进行了细菌学负荷分析和主要细菌的分离。总体平均细菌总数为2.3 × 10 ~ 1.65 × 10cfu/ml,其中直接采自奶牛的牛奶样本平均值为56.20 × 10cfu/ml,采自农场设备(桶)的牛奶样本平均值为92.25 × 10cfu/ml。结果显示,两个采奶点的菌落总数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与直接从牛奶中提取的样本相比,桶中牛奶样本的细菌总数较高。在本研究中,挤奶系统和处理方法,如乳房清洁、挤奶前洗手和清洁容器的卫生状况很差。与从用于给骆驼挤奶的设备中采集的牛奶样本相比,从奶牛中采集的牛奶样本中的大肠菌群数量没有观察到统计学上显著的变化。与此同时,大肠菌群数量从乳房(乳头)水平到设备(桶)水平均有有限的增加(P > 0.05)。牛奶中大肠菌群数量高表明牛奶受到粪便污染。牛奶在不卫生的条件下生产和处理。目前的研究结果表明,在研究区域生产和处理的骆驼奶,除非经过巴氏消毒,否则一般可视为质量不合格。因此,本风险评估研究与埃塞俄比亚不同地区类似的不同研究报告可能为埃塞俄比亚国家牛奶质量标准的制定提供依据。接收日期:2018年9月4日在线发布日期:2018年10月20日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Bacteriological Quality Major Bacterial Pathogens and Handling Practices of Raw Camel Milk in Ab’ala Woreda of Afar National Regional State, Ethiopia
Article Info In Ethiopia, most of the camel milk production is accounted by the traditional milk processing system and unhygienic handling that are generally poor in processing capacity, causing high product loss and risky for public consumption. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Ab’ala woreda of Afar national regional state from August to November 2017 with the objective of assessing the bacteriological quality, handling practice and major bacterial pathogens of camel milk. The study methodology employed was questionnaire survey and observational study for handling practice and bacteriological count and isolation and detection of major pathogenic bacteria from raw camel milk. Thirty (30) purposively selected camel herders were interviewed for the survey-based study of milk handling practices and forty raw milk samples were aseptically collected and tested for bacteriological load analysis and isolation of major bacteria. The overall average total bacterial count ranged from 2.3x10 to 1.65x10 cfu/ml with a mean value of 56.20x10 milk samples directly from the teat and 92.25x10cfu/ml milk samples from equipment (buckets) at farm level. Results showed very significant differences in total plate counts (P < 0.05) between the two milk collection points. The total bacterial count of the milk samples was high in buckets when compared to the samples taken from the teat directly. In this study milking system and handling practices like udder cleaning, hand washing before milking and cleaning vessels was in poor sanitary condition. No statistically significant variation was observed in coliform counts in milk samples collected from the teat compared to milk samples from the equipment used to milk camels. Meanwhile, coliform counts demonstrated a limited increase (P > 0.05) from udder (teat) to equipment (bucket) level. High coliform count in milk indicates fecal contamination of milk. Milk was produced and handled in unhygienic condition. The results of the current study indicated that the camel milk produced and handling in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality for consumption unless pasteurized. Therefore, this risk assessment study with similar different studies reported from different regions in Ethiopia might provide a basis for the establishment of national milk quality standards in Ethiopia. Accepted: 04 September 2018 Available Online: 20 October 2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信