1000mg与500mg口服胞胆碱对原发性开角型青光眼视野及神经节细胞层厚度影响的比较

Vdo Asrory
{"title":"1000mg与500mg口服胞胆碱对原发性开角型青光眼视野及神经节细胞层厚度影响的比较","authors":"Vdo Asrory","doi":"10.23880/oajo-16000234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the effects of 1000 mg and 500 mg oral citicoline on the visual field, retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cells layer thickness in well controlled primary open angle glaucoma. Methods: A double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 50 subjects (75 eyes). The randomization divided the subjects into two groups, the 1000 mg group and the 500 mg group. The evaluations were performed after 30 days and 60 days intervention by assessing Mean Deviation (MD) and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) of Humphrey Visual field as well as retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GCIPL) on ocular imaging. Results: After 60 days, there was no significant difference between both groups in the MD, PSD, RNFL, and GCIPL values. The median MD increased in the 1000 mg group from -9.96 dB at baseline to -5.0 dB after 60 days and from the intragroup analysis, there was a significant difference (p=0.008). Based on subgroup analysis, there was also significant difference before and after the intervention in the mild glaucoma receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. RNFL and GCIPL thickness in both groups were tended to be stable. A side effect of nausea was found in two subjects who each received a dose of 500 mg and 1000 mg citicoline. Conclusion: There was an improvement in the MD and PSD values in both groups after 60 days of oral citicoline administration, but a significant difference was found in mild glaucoma group receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. The thickness of RNFL and GCIPL in both groups did not decrease after 60 days of citicoline administration.","PeriodicalId":91939,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effect of 1000mg and 500mg Oral Citicoline on Visual Field and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"Vdo Asrory\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/oajo-16000234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare the effects of 1000 mg and 500 mg oral citicoline on the visual field, retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cells layer thickness in well controlled primary open angle glaucoma. Methods: A double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 50 subjects (75 eyes). The randomization divided the subjects into two groups, the 1000 mg group and the 500 mg group. The evaluations were performed after 30 days and 60 days intervention by assessing Mean Deviation (MD) and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) of Humphrey Visual field as well as retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GCIPL) on ocular imaging. Results: After 60 days, there was no significant difference between both groups in the MD, PSD, RNFL, and GCIPL values. The median MD increased in the 1000 mg group from -9.96 dB at baseline to -5.0 dB after 60 days and from the intragroup analysis, there was a significant difference (p=0.008). Based on subgroup analysis, there was also significant difference before and after the intervention in the mild glaucoma receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. RNFL and GCIPL thickness in both groups were tended to be stable. A side effect of nausea was found in two subjects who each received a dose of 500 mg and 1000 mg citicoline. Conclusion: There was an improvement in the MD and PSD values in both groups after 60 days of oral citicoline administration, but a significant difference was found in mild glaucoma group receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. The thickness of RNFL and GCIPL in both groups did not decrease after 60 days of citicoline administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open access journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open access journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较口服胞胆碱1000 mg和500 mg对控制良好的原发性开角型青光眼的视野、视网膜神经纤维层和神经节细胞层厚度的影响。方法:采用双盲随机对照试验,50例(75眼)。随机化将受试者分为两组,1000毫克组和500毫克组。分别在干预30天和60天后,通过评估汉弗莱视野的平均偏差(MD)和模式标准差(PSD),以及视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)和神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)的眼部成像进行评估。结果:60天后,两组患者的MD、PSD、RNFL和GCIPL值无显著差异。1000 mg组的中位MD从基线时的-9.96 dB增加到60天后的-5.0 dB,从组内分析来看,差异有统计学意义(p=0.008)。经亚组分析,轻度青光眼给予500 mg胞硫胆碱,中重度青光眼给予1000 mg胞硫胆碱,干预前后也有显著差异。两组RNFL和GCIPL厚度均趋于稳定。在接受500毫克和1000毫克胞胆碱剂量的两名受试者中发现了恶心的副作用。结论:两组患者口服胞硫胆碱60 d后MD和PSD值均有改善,但轻度青光眼组给予500 mg胞硫胆碱,中重度青光眼组给予1000 mg胞硫胆碱,差异有统计学意义。给予胞胆碱60 d后,两组RNFL和GCIPL厚度均未减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Effect of 1000mg and 500mg Oral Citicoline on Visual Field and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Purpose: To compare the effects of 1000 mg and 500 mg oral citicoline on the visual field, retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cells layer thickness in well controlled primary open angle glaucoma. Methods: A double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 50 subjects (75 eyes). The randomization divided the subjects into two groups, the 1000 mg group and the 500 mg group. The evaluations were performed after 30 days and 60 days intervention by assessing Mean Deviation (MD) and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) of Humphrey Visual field as well as retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GCIPL) on ocular imaging. Results: After 60 days, there was no significant difference between both groups in the MD, PSD, RNFL, and GCIPL values. The median MD increased in the 1000 mg group from -9.96 dB at baseline to -5.0 dB after 60 days and from the intragroup analysis, there was a significant difference (p=0.008). Based on subgroup analysis, there was also significant difference before and after the intervention in the mild glaucoma receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. RNFL and GCIPL thickness in both groups were tended to be stable. A side effect of nausea was found in two subjects who each received a dose of 500 mg and 1000 mg citicoline. Conclusion: There was an improvement in the MD and PSD values in both groups after 60 days of oral citicoline administration, but a significant difference was found in mild glaucoma group receiving 500 mg citicoline and in moderate-severe glaucoma receiving 1000 mg citicoline. The thickness of RNFL and GCIPL in both groups did not decrease after 60 days of citicoline administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信