你可以是非物质的(也可以不是)

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1017/s0034412523000719

Andrew M. Bailey

{"title":"你可以是非物质的(也可以不是)","authors":"Andrew M. Bailey","doi":"10.1017/s0034412523000719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Materialists about human persons say that we are, and must be, wholly material beings. Substance dualists say that we are, and must be, wholly immaterial. In this article, I take issue with the ‘and must be’ bits. Both materialists and substance dualists would do well to reject modal extensions of their views and instead opt for contingent doctrines, or doctrines that are silent about those modal extensions. Or so I argue.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You could be immaterial (or not)\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0034412523000719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Materialists about human persons say that we are, and must be, wholly material beings. Substance dualists say that we are, and must be, wholly immaterial. In this article, I take issue with the ‘and must be’ bits. Both materialists and substance dualists would do well to reject modal extensions of their views and instead opt for contingent doctrines, or doctrines that are silent about those modal extensions. Or so I argue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RELIGIOUS STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RELIGIOUS STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412523000719\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412523000719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于人的唯物主义者说，我们是，也必须是，完全的物质存在。实体二元论者说，我们是，而且必须是，完全非物质的。在这篇文章中，我对“必须是”的部分提出了异议。唯物主义者和物质二元论者都可以很好地拒绝他们观点的模态延伸，而选择偶然性理论，或者对这些模态延伸保持沉默的理论。至少我是这么认为的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

You could be immaterial (or not)

Materialists about human persons say that we are, and must be, wholly material beings. Substance dualists say that we are, and must be, wholly immaterial. In this article, I take issue with the ‘and must be’ bits. Both materialists and substance dualists would do well to reject modal extensions of their views and instead opt for contingent doctrines, or doctrines that are silent about those modal extensions. Or so I argue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

RELIGIOUS STUDIES RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Religious Studies is an international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion as they arise out of classical and contemporary discussions and from varied religious traditions. More than 25 articles are published each year, and the journal also contains an extensive book review section.